- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If Trump gets the ok to institutionalize trannies, how quickly do some revert?
Posted on 9/4/25 at 9:37 pm to onmymedicalgrind
Posted on 9/4/25 at 9:37 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
Now, who gets to do the "declaring?"
ultimately the courts. that's how our system works.
1
Posted on 9/4/25 at 9:39 pm to Rebel
This would give nearly unlimited power to the government to disarm almost anyone in the population that they want to. Hard pass.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 9:40 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
By the clear terms of 2A… YES!
seems to me you need to be in front of SCOTUS as well as every state Supreme Court as well and make a name for yourself.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 9:40 pm to Rebel
quote:
found, declared, adjudicated, (pick your verb)
This is the part you’re missing from the OP.
I’m not disputing prisoners are deprived of liberty after being afforded due process in the court system.
You’re missing a key step. Daddy can’t just declare people to be bad and then things are taken away with no opportunity for someone else in our government to review that declaration. I can’t believe I had to spell that out for you, you know, as a guy who was a constitutional conservative hell bent on opposing power grabs from Obama and Biden
This post was edited on 9/4/25 at 9:42 pm
Posted on 9/4/25 at 9:46 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
You’re missing a key step. Daddy can’t just declare people to be bad and then things are taken away with no opportunity for someone else in our government to review that declaration. I
Did you take dos? You seem to be missing a key step in the OP.
quote:
If Trump gets the ok to institutionalize trannies
That's what is known as an "if" statement. So for, "Daddy" to get the OK, (ok is an impactful word here) to institutionalize anyone, due process will have already taken place.
The OP
quote:
If Trump gets the ok to institutionalize trannies, how quickly do some revert?
The point I believe you are arguing from.
quote:
If Trump institutionalize trannies, how quickly do some revert?
see how those two sentences are different?
This post was edited on 9/4/25 at 9:48 pm
Posted on 9/4/25 at 9:49 pm to Rebel
quote:
seems to me you need to be in front of SCOTUS as well as every state Supreme Court as well and make a name for yourself.
Clarence Thomas, and by extension, Bruen say you get to pick and choose from the historical record and try to convince a panel of judges what 18th century aristocrats and learned men anticipated the 21st century to entail as it concerns society, gun control, and the general health and welfare of the country.
This post was edited on 9/4/25 at 9:56 pm
Posted on 9/4/25 at 11:29 pm to boosiebadazz
Damn boozie you a trans activist now?
I thought people got more conservative as they aged.
Smh
I thought people got more conservative as they aged.
Smh
Posted on 9/4/25 at 11:32 pm to Dex Morgan
quote:you can sew it back on but not sure it’ll ever work again
make a swift return to factory settings
Posted on 9/5/25 at 12:10 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
Miscegenation was outlawed and I know you’ve jerked it to some sistas.
Do you often think about other guys jerking it?
Posted on 9/5/25 at 12:16 am to Rebel
quote:
How do eunuchs revert.
I think he was talking about the ones that just dress up female as a sexual fetish or because it's a fad. I have more respect for the ones who go through the entire charade of turning female. (Cutting off sexual organs is going full monty)
Posted on 9/5/25 at 12:22 am to Dex Morgan
Lock they/them up immediately.
Posted on 9/5/25 at 12:48 am to Rebel
quote:
up until 2013 and 2020 being a trans was considered a mental illness by just about every medical organization on the planet.
if we can't agree that chopping your dick or titties off is something only a mentally unstable person would do, we are already doomed.
I think the point is there’s a slippery slope created when you give a president this kind of power.
It’s not out of the question for the other side to deem you or someone mentally ill for believing something against their worldview.
Dialectics trick people when there’s so much truth and sense laced into what is otherwise just a trick and being used as a pretext.
Right now, conservatives are being targeted greatly by this side of the dialectic. It seems to be one of the main agendas of building MAGA and it’s working to near perfection as people are literally asking why their cities crime isn’t being fixed by the military.
Posted on 9/5/25 at 12:54 am to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
The DSMV is a very thick book with a lot of mental illnesses. Who gets to decide which ones mean no guns versus which ones don’t?
We can use common sense and go with the ones with a high suicide rate. That would be an objective measurement and exclude most mental illnesses.
It's a practical solution, but it will be rejected by leftists because trannies are your holy grail for some perverted reason.
Posted on 9/5/25 at 12:54 am to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
The DSMV is a very thick book with a lot of mental illnesses. Who gets to decide which ones mean no guns versus which ones don’t?
We can use common sense and go with the ones with a high suicide rate. That would be an objective measurement and exclude most mental illnesses.
It's a practical solution, but it will be rejected by leftists because trannies are your holy grail for some perverted reason.
Posted on 9/5/25 at 12:54 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
Kudos to the AI that can synthesize liberty, due process, and chicks with dicks for our welders and liquor salesmen to understand.
I see where you're going but, let me ask you a hypothetical to illustrate how maybe it's not so cut and dry.
In the 80s and early 90s, we sort of had an epidemic of Anorexia and Bulimia. I'm sure it wasn't as bad as advertised, but, it was a big issue. Imagine if, for some odd reason, it had become political and one side demanded that the proper thing to do with people who "Believed" they were fat when they weren't is to support them and help them lose weight. While the other side said, no, these people are sick and need help.
Would ANYONE be portraying the "help them starve" faction as the "caring" folks? Would ANYONE be arguing it was a question of freedom?
We have a sickness in this nation that has been spreading and one side is HELPING it spread. I'm on the "these people are sick and actually need REAL help" side.
Posted on 9/5/25 at 12:59 am to Grumpy Nemesis
quote:
We have a sickness in this nation that has been spreading and one side is HELPING it spread
What if there’s something, or things, trying to make everything sick and everything ruined?
Posted on 9/5/25 at 1:00 am to TenWheelsForJesus
quote:
We can use common sense and go with the ones with a high suicide rate. That would be an objective measurement and exclude most mental illnesses.
It's a practical solution, but it will be rejected by leftists because trannies are your holy grail for some perverted reason.
Politics is intentionally being made a joke of so that AI can fix it with ‘objective common sense’.
Posted on 9/5/25 at 5:11 am to Dex Morgan
Put the trannies in the fema camps that liberals were going to put the right in
Posted on 9/5/25 at 5:52 am to TenWheelsForJesus
quote:
We can use common sense
No way this just happened hahaha
We just need “common sense” gun control huh? Where have I heard that before?!!
Spoken like an obedient little progressive.
Posted on 9/5/25 at 6:15 am to novabill
quote:
Taking their liberty is a problem.
Mental illness took their liberty. Anyone who has gender dysmorphia in any capacity is not of sound mind and body to have the moral character to safely own a firearm.
quote:
Next not believing in global warming or believing in a creator will be grounds for the left to do the same
The left has moved the country so far left DJT, a lifelong Blue Dog Democrat is now the embodiment for the alt right.
To suggest the left willl do what it is doing and has always done if something is done counter to their ideology is naive at best.
To suggest global warming/religion is equal to gender dysmorphia/genital mutilation is also asinine.
You’re worried about being punched in the face in the future while you’re currently being punched in the face. It’s the most fascinating frustrating position in conservative ideology.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News