- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I wonder how oppressed women feel
Posted on 1/24/17 at 12:10 pm to olgoi khorkhoi
Posted on 1/24/17 at 12:10 pm to olgoi khorkhoi
Most have more pressing and immediate issues. They´re surely aghast at the idleness and thanklessness of the protesting women. I´m sure they doubt their intelligence, as well.
Posted on 1/24/17 at 12:10 pm to When in Rome
quote:
Did you read the whiny article I posted a couple of pages back?
i'm reading it while i'm prepping lunch
it's mixing first wave and 3rd wave feminism as if they're the same thing
they're just saying "you stupid bitch. you owe first wave feminism respect, so that means NOW you have to follow our 3rd wave feminism b/c we are creating all these boogeymen that don't affect you b/c you're so stupid and ungrateful"
it's just your typical prog standing on the shoulders of actual pioneers who actually suffered so that they can try to sell and justify their insanity
Posted on 1/24/17 at 12:12 pm to When in Rome
quote:
Sounds to me like she poorly negotiated her contract.
She obviously did, but it says something about the person who's first reaction to this situation is to assume sexism. There are several more likely factors, including corporate pay structure that gives raises on a schedule or, even more likely, they are in business to make money and offered her less than they thought she would accept as a negotiating tactic.
Like so many with this victim mentality, he and his wife have been told by the president and the media that she is being or is going to be victimized. When a perceived slight then occurs, there is a confirmation bias. No thought is given to alternative reasons this "bad" thing (some people see promotions as a good thing) occurred. Victim is the default mode for a lot of people.
Posted on 1/24/17 at 12:16 pm to Korkstand
quote:
Do you have no idea that some people can become as proficient in 1 year as others can in 25? The time doesn't matter, it's what you know and how well you do the job
That's not how business, or even government jobs usually work.
Now if you become as valuable over a short time you can move up quickly. But unless you have incredible negotiating skills, you're not getting top pay until you prove yourself.
It has nothing going to do with being female.
Posted on 1/24/17 at 12:16 pm to olgoi khorkhoi
quote:
There are several more likely factors, including corporate pay structure
which was likely created to be sex-neutral to avoid allegations of sexism
Posted on 1/24/17 at 12:18 pm to olgoi khorkhoi
quote:
Why do you think they offered her $65k?
It will take too long for me to go into all the details of what led to that offer, but I know for a fact that a large part of the reason was because she's a woman. It's no secret amongst the employees there that women are underpaid compared to men. We've heard similar stories from others that we are friends with inside the organization. Most women there are pissed, but they are afraid of speaking out for fear of losing their jobs. So, no one ever says anything to try to change it.
So my wife really had only three choices, 1. accept it; 2. decline and risk losing her job; 3. search for other employment and in her line of work it's not easy finding another job.
Even where I work as an Engineer, I know women or underpaid compared to men. Don't act like it doesn't exists.
This post was edited on 1/24/17 at 12:21 pm
Posted on 1/24/17 at 12:21 pm to Hammond Tiger Fan
if all that is true it's an EEOC violation (i'm assuming based on the description there are enough employees to qualify). we LITERALLY have laws for that scenario, if true
Posted on 1/24/17 at 12:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:It's really a bad strategy because she juxtaposes multiple similar causes and the "one of these is not like the others" is plainly obvious when those causes are held side by side with the current "women's rights movement".
they're just saying "you stupid bitch. you owe first wave feminism respect, so that means NOW you have to follow our 3rd wave feminism b/c we are creating all these boogeymen that don't affect you b/c you're so stupid and ungrateful"
it's just your typical prog standing on the shoulders of actual pioneers who actually suffered so that they can try to sell and justify their insanity
This post was edited on 1/24/17 at 12:22 pm
Posted on 1/24/17 at 12:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Sure it does. What do you think the ratio is?
i mean if you're talking about relationship power play, this goes both ways
quote:I can't really comment on how common those shows are vs. the reverse because I don't watch them, but if true then I'd say it's just a result of the way things have always been. No doubt these shows are comedies, and it's just inherently funny when the leader or head of household would be absolutely lost without his "supporting cast".
i mean frick the most common marital relationship on TV since the 90s has been the bumbling, stupid, and selfish husband who has to be relentlessly saved by the saintly, intelligent, and selfless wife.
quote:Those already have labels.
so how do we label a relationship with a dominant female?
But yeah, any relationship with a controlling member surely lacks respect to some degree. Did I imply that it's ok if the roles are reversed? I apologize if I did, but it should be obvious which way these things go in the overwhelming majority of cases.
Posted on 1/24/17 at 12:23 pm to When in Rome
quote:
It's really a bad strategy because she juxtaposes multiple similar causes and the "one of these is not like the others" is plainly obvious when those causes are held side by side with the current "women's rights movement".
it's also fricking retarded
quote:
Your daughters are still told they are beautiful before they are told they are smart. Your daughters are still told to behave even though “boys will be boys.” Your daughters are still told boys pull hair or pinch them because they like them.
You are not equal. Your daughters are not equal. You are still systemically oppressed.
our whole society has been feminized to give women an advantage and they have a huge one these days
Gender gap in college graduation rates
quote:
According to data from the Department of Education on college degrees by gender, the US college degree gap favoring women started back in 1978, when for the first time ever, more women than men earned Associate’s degrees. Five years later in 1982, women earned more bachelor’s degrees than men for the first time, and women have increased their share of bachelor’s degrees in every year since then. In another five years by 1987, women earned the majority of master’s degrees for the first time. Finally, within another decade, more women than men earned doctor’s degrees by 2006, and female domination of college degrees at every level was complete. For the current graduating class of 2013, the Department of Education estimates that women will earn 61.6% of all associate’s degrees this year, 56.7% of all bachelor’s degrees, 59.9% of all master’s degrees, and 51.6% of all doctor’s degrees. Overall, 140 women will graduate with a college degree at some level this year for every 100 men.
fricking patriarchy
Posted on 1/24/17 at 12:23 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
if all that is true it's an EEOC violation (i'm assuming based on the description there are enough employees to qualify). we LITERALLY have laws for that scenario, if true
Laws doesn't apply if you work for a religious organization or at least that is what was told to me.
This post was edited on 1/24/17 at 12:25 pm
Posted on 1/24/17 at 12:25 pm to Korkstand
quote:
Yeah, I asked a question. Do you give all women as little credit as you are giving the millions who marched?
I'll answer that after you provide some evidence that "many if not most" of these people (there were plenty men, who think like hammondtiger, present) were not, in fact, protesting the American patriarchy and Donald Trump, but were marching for the truly oppressed who can't march for themselves.
Or you can admit you're speculating without any evidence and we'll move on.
Posted on 1/24/17 at 12:25 pm to Korkstand
quote:
What do you think the ratio is?
i don't know. care to post data?
quote:
but it should be obvious which way these things go in the overwhelming majority of cases.
think about that comment and that data that has been presented to support how "obvious" it is
also, be careful not to tread into territory of racism and classism
Posted on 1/24/17 at 12:29 pm to Chimlim
quote:
And they really, really, really want to kill their unborn babies.
I'm arguing about 3 or 4 right now. One just asked my Margaret Sanger is relevant seeing how she died 50 years ago....in a debate about planned parenthood.
Rest assured, i've been challenging every one of them that try to debate me, and all have fallen silent except that one. She's still trying to justify abortion.
She even stated that
quote:
Embryo's aren't people. They are potential. I know it has to be terribly painful to believe that a life starts at conception and the idea that a life is being taken via abortion but it is simply scientifically incorrect.
Which i countered the scientific data that an embryo is a fertilized egg maturing to a fetus from 2-8 weeks. I then countered if she would then agree that abortions after 8 weeks should be illegal. Still awaiting a response.
They are too easy to debate.
Posted on 1/24/17 at 12:33 pm to SlowFlowPro
TIME: 6 Feminist Myths That Will Not Die
quote:
MYTH 5: Women earn 77 cents for every dollar a man earns—for doing the same work.
FACTS: No matter how many times this wage gap claim is decisively refuted by economists, it always comes back. The bottom line: the 23-cent gender pay gap is simply the difference between the average earnings of all men and women working full-time. It does not account for differences in occupations, positions, education, job tenure or hours worked per week. When such relevant factors are considered, the wage gap narrows to the point of vanishing.
Wage gap activists say women with identical backgrounds and jobs as men still earn less. But they always fail to take into account critical variables. Activist groups like the National Organization for Women have a fallback position: that women’s education and career choices are not truly free—they are driven by powerful sexist stereotypes. In this view, women’s tendency to retreat from the workplace to raise children or to enter fields like early childhood education and psychology, rather than better paying professions like petroleum engineering, is evidence of continued social coercion. Here is the problem: American women are among the best informed and most self-determining human beings in the world. To say that they are manipulated into their life choices by forces beyond their control is divorced from reality and demeaning, to boot.
Posted on 1/24/17 at 12:37 pm to olgoi khorkhoi
Lulz...A group of older white men and their younger brothers still in college thinking on why women protest.
I would wager my Yugo no one here has ever had a meaningful conversation with the woman who checks your shite out at Target or Walmart, but yeah....go on with your alpha self
I would wager my Yugo no one here has ever had a meaningful conversation with the woman who checks your shite out at Target or Walmart, but yeah....go on with your alpha self
Posted on 1/24/17 at 12:37 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:I know how things work, I've been alive for a while.
That's not how business, or even government jobs usually work.
What I'm trying to say is this is part of the mentality that people are growing tired of. It's much easier for a "have" to get more than it is for a "have not" to catch up, regardless of how deserving either is. As long as the status quo is maintained, the divide will continue to grow, and people will continue to get angry.
Posted on 1/24/17 at 12:37 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
also, be careful not to tread into territory of racism and classism
If I could only upvote more than once...
Also, I wish you had left that statement off above and just allowed him to blow himself up.
Posted on 1/24/17 at 12:38 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Your daughters are still told they are beautiful before they are told they are smart. Your daughters are still told to behave even though “boys will be boys.” Your daughters are still told boys pull hair or pinch them because they like them.
You are not equal. Your daughters are not equal. You are still systemically oppressed.
Most sons are told they are handsome before they are told they´re smart. I don´t think that´s ruined them or their position in this world.
Where did this one grow up that the daughters are told to behave and unsightely behaviour by boys is ignored?
Girls pull hair and pinch when they like boys, as well.
Smart girls know the system favors them. They just have to be aware and work it.
Posted on 1/24/17 at 12:38 pm to Mr. Katanga
quote:
would wager my Yugo no one here has ever had a meaningful conversation with the woman who checks your shite out at Target or Walmart
wait
are you implying i don't interact with poor people/women?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News