- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: "I Support the Second Amendment, but..."
Posted on 8/16/19 at 9:55 am to i am dan
Posted on 8/16/19 at 9:55 am to i am dan
quote:
I'm all pro2A,
Sure you are.
quote:
There's already "buts" to the 2A now. Gun free zones are a "but". Limited magazines are a "but". Background checks are a "but". Many more "buts".
So your argument is that because politicians and Fudds have spent the last 8 decades inserting all of those "buts" that more should be accepted rather than working to block further erosion and work to remove more of those "buts" (which, if you brainless Fudds could be bothered to pay attention is exactly what's been happening in the last 15 years)?
This post was edited on 8/16/19 at 9:56 am
Posted on 8/16/19 at 10:54 am to Clames
quote:
Sure you are.
Just stop with this tired old bullshite.
Am I right or wrong?
Not gonna argue the second point since it's tied to opinion.
Posted on 8/16/19 at 10:57 am to CamdenTiger
Yeah because we are in definite danger of this happening...when exactly?
Posted on 8/16/19 at 11:06 am to xGeauxLSUx
That was a great video, OP! Thank you!
Posted on 8/16/19 at 11:08 am to i am dan
You're wrong and yours is the attitude that is part of the problem. Uninformed gun owners are just as bad as gun-control advocates.
Posted on 8/16/19 at 11:13 am to Clames
quote:
You're wrong and yours is the attitude that is part of the problem. Uninformed gun owners are just as bad as gun-control advocates.
How am I wrong? You people are acting like gun rights have never been touched.
I listed 3 examples. How am I wrong?
I'm not arguing about anything else.
Posted on 8/16/19 at 11:15 am to birchbayduck
quote:
Yeah because we are in definite danger of this happening...when exactly?
So because the chances are slim now that means they will always be that way? Short-sighted, myopic argument but typical for you.
Posted on 8/16/19 at 11:20 am to i am dan
quote:
How am I wrong? You people are acting like gun rights have never been touched.
Wrong, the argument is that current level of infringement is too much. You are the one acting like just because certain restrictions exist that they should be accepted. It's a demonstration of ignorance about the history of gun-control legislation. It's ignorance about why laws concerning concealed weapons and "sporting purpose" exist at all.
Posted on 8/16/19 at 11:45 am to xGeauxLSUx
quote:
T.REX ARMS
I like it
Posted on 8/16/19 at 11:46 am to flyAU
Their channel is awesome. Dude can frickin flat out shoot.
Posted on 8/17/19 at 12:28 pm to Clames
umm no. I live in the world of REALITY
Posted on 8/17/19 at 12:32 pm to birchbayduck
quote:
bitchbaycuck
quote:
I live in the world of IGNORANCE
FIFY x2.
Posted on 8/17/19 at 2:12 pm to SlapahoeTribe
quote:He goes back to the 1100's to give examples of what he wants to be the "arms" mentioned in the 2nd A.
you have anything to comment on the substance of the video, or are you just going to be your usual self
So that's not extreme, huh?
Posted on 8/17/19 at 2:17 pm to texridder
Magna Carta that has influenced British and American legal systems dates back to 1215. The concept of armed self-defense in legal terms is far older. You are simply ignorant.
Posted on 8/17/19 at 3:11 pm to Clames
quote:You are all the way to stupid. You can't follow a simple discussion and respond. So instead, you routinely spout out memorized, packaged crap without any ability to relate your tripe a point being discussed.
Magna Carta that has influenced British and American legal systems dates back to 1215. The concept of armed self-defense in legal terms is far older. You are simply ignorant.
I didn't say anything about legal systems. I specifically took issue with using examples of the arms of 1100 as having relevance to the arms being contemplated in the 2nd Amendment.
Want to try again?
Posted on 8/17/19 at 3:18 pm to i am dan
quote:
Gun free zones are a "but".
They foreshadow how well gun bans would wrk
They don't, it wouldn't
Posted on 8/17/19 at 3:22 pm to texridder
quote:
I specifically took issue with using examples of the arms of 1100 as having relevance to the arms being contemplated in the 2nd Amendment.
Of course they have relevance. How could they not?
Posted on 8/17/19 at 4:21 pm to xGeauxLSUx
quote:I did. Very good video.
Did you check out the video Wolf?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News