re: I need a Trumper to explain something

A left winger complaining about contradictions passes all wondering

quote:

---

He said the other day that President Biden's FBI was "locked and loaded" (his words) and ready to kill him when they searched Mar-a-Lago (despite the fact that they searched the place on a day when Trump was a thousand miles away). And, on cue, the cul ... the supporters lost their mind. How DARE President Biden send the FBI to kill Trump! Banana state! Third-world shithole country!

At the same time, Trump has a case in front of the United State Supreme Court arguing that he has complete immunity, and one of the very arguments his lawyers agreed with was that as president, Trump could order Seal Team 6 to assassinate a political rival and that would be A-OK.

---

These two things do not contradict eachother like you think they do.

Trump's lawyers were arguing a hypothetical about the level of immunity a US president should hold while in office. You're acting like it was suggested that he *should* order assassinations and his lawyers were arguing the merits of it.

They were simply giving an example. Meanwhile Biden's DOJ clearly persecuted a political rival in real life. The two thoughts and arguments aren't contradictory to anyone with a few brain cells

Hypocrisy is what separates humans from the computers.

quote:

---

Why are so many Arky fans weak men?

---

It says there right in his handle that he's been exiled. And for good reason apparently

He was "voted off the island" so to say

quote:

---

exiledhogfan

---

You don't understand?

Good! It's working.

1. Trump was using the assassination of a political opponent concept as an extreme example of what his immunity powers would have allowed him to do. Not that he would do it because obviously he never attempted anything like it when he was president. And he would not do it because this is the USA, not Russia or North Korea.

2. The fact that Biden's DOJ gave a legal order to raid Trump's home and use deadly force against Trump if necessary, would seem to prove Trump's point that presidential immunity would, in fact, give him the authority to order a political opponent to be killed.

That's the difference between the two parties. Trump, the supposed dictator, never attempted anything of the sort but the Democrats tried to frame Trump for Russia collusion, convicted him of a fabricated crime, and had his home raided with authorization to kill him.

Maybe you should look into the contradiction of Biden saying Putin is evil and has no soul but turns around and uses all of Putin's evil tactics to try and take out his political opposition.

Your idiocy aside, just because they have full immunity ( until an impeachment & prosecution happens) doesn’t mean t should happen. That’s the Banana Republic actions. This is the reference was. You may want to understand further why it happened in the first place. They set the whole thing in motion by packing &shipping boxes of items that they put together and said it was was en route to him. He didn’t necessarily know what was in them. They set in motion a series of requests because they were looking for Crossfire Hurricane documents and had no authority to access them because Trump had declassified them and was retaining them. In the day Biden was sworn in a injunction preventing Trump from using them was done which obviously is still in place

quote:

---

exiledhogfan

---

Why, you may ask, is it always a Hog fan? These are the remnants of the old yellow dog democrats that used to run Arkansas in the early Clintonian era. Believe me, there are some real backwoods ole baws up there that love them some Bill Clinton. Mostly union workers.

And you support Joe Biden and the destructive left, which says way more about you and your lack of depth and ease of manipulation.

Yeah, I've never seen an Obama t-shirt. Never.