- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Hypothetical of course but list your order of who you want to see perp walked?
Posted on 11/14/24 at 1:33 pm to rwestmore7
Posted on 11/14/24 at 1:33 pm to rwestmore7
quote:
What kind of clown world are we living in where you all are openly calling to jail journalists?
I agree, in any sensible world the citizenry would have already sorted out these folks who lie for profit and do incalculable damage to our society.
Posted on 11/14/24 at 1:35 pm to idlewatcher
It's difficult for me to get over what Hilldawg, Strzok, and Page did in Russiagate. I think BHO and Biden had a role, too, but it's hard to prove.
Clapper, Brennan, and Schiff lied every day about Russiagate to the press, but I don't think any of that is a crime.
Vindman and CIAmarella are traitors for that smear job.
The 51 former intel officers may not have done anything criminal, but they destroyed the credibility of the intel agencies.
Clapper, Brennan, and Schiff lied every day about Russiagate to the press, but I don't think any of that is a crime.
Vindman and CIAmarella are traitors for that smear job.
The 51 former intel officers may not have done anything criminal, but they destroyed the credibility of the intel agencies.
This post was edited on 11/14/24 at 2:00 pm
Posted on 11/14/24 at 1:36 pm to Pettifogger
Honestly, no one.
If an investigation needs to happen because a provable crime has been committed, then investigate it. If there’s clear evidence that someone committed a crime, charge them.
I don’t want to be like the other side and use the law to imprison political opponents just because I’m angry with them.
If an investigation needs to happen because a provable crime has been committed, then investigate it. If there’s clear evidence that someone committed a crime, charge them.
I don’t want to be like the other side and use the law to imprison political opponents just because I’m angry with them.
Posted on 11/14/24 at 1:38 pm to idlewatcher
Shirforbrains Adam
Adam Schiff says Trump 'danger to the Republic'


Adam Schiff says Trump 'danger to the Republic'
This post was edited on 11/14/24 at 1:41 pm
Posted on 11/14/24 at 1:39 pm to Bunk Moreland
Regarding Brennan - he absolutely lied to Congress in 2014.
The 51 intel officers and the people who organized that effort likely violated some federal law for conspiring to interfere with an election - I imagine some of the same laws stretched to go after the electors/Jan 6 stuff could be used here. If you can't make it work, you can't make it work. But I would 100% support exploring that, as it was an egregiously corrupt effort.
The 51 intel officers and the people who organized that effort likely violated some federal law for conspiring to interfere with an election - I imagine some of the same laws stretched to go after the electors/Jan 6 stuff could be used here. If you can't make it work, you can't make it work. But I would 100% support exploring that, as it was an egregiously corrupt effort.
Posted on 11/14/24 at 1:41 pm to idlewatcher
Garland - heard he can't afford the legal fees
Brennan
Clapper
Mayorkas
Biden
Brennan
Clapper
Mayorkas
Biden
Posted on 11/14/24 at 1:42 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
Vindman
This, this cocksocker lied and was elected.
Posted on 11/14/24 at 1:42 pm to bluestem75
quote:
I don’t want to be like the other side and use the law to imprison political opponents just because I’m angry with them.
Brennan and Strzok committed crimes, full stop.
Many others engaged in highly corrupt abuses of power that victimized the public, and I think that warrants exploration of whether there are violations those acts fall under.
Posted on 11/14/24 at 1:43 pm to bluestem75
The Durham report laid out a lot of it. They knew Russiagate was a scam from the start.
I see from some old posts that Bongino said the Durham report indicated the government had 174 exculpatory statements from Papadopolous.
Bongino also explained how the deep state moved from Papadapolous to Danchenko to Kilimnik. Kilimnik was a big State Dept Ukraine source during the Obama administration and there is no evidence he was a Russian spy.


I see from some old posts that Bongino said the Durham report indicated the government had 174 exculpatory statements from Papadopolous.

Bongino also explained how the deep state moved from Papadapolous to Danchenko to Kilimnik. Kilimnik was a big State Dept Ukraine source during the Obama administration and there is no evidence he was a Russian spy.
Posted on 11/14/24 at 1:43 pm to rwestmore7
quote:
What kind of clown world are we living in where you all are openly calling to jail journalists?
The one created by the Dems when they... openly jailed journalists? That one?
Posted on 11/14/24 at 1:43 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
Brennan and Strzok committed crimes, full stop.
Like what?
Posted on 11/14/24 at 1:44 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
The 51 intel officers and the people who organized that effort likely violated some federal law for conspiring to interfere with an election -
Huh?
Posted on 11/14/24 at 1:46 pm to bogart
quote:
Soros.
Instant lead poisoning
Its the head of the snake many of these POS people work directly for.
Posted on 11/14/24 at 1:48 pm to idlewatcher
Strokz
Brennan
Gen. Shithead
Keith Oberman
Comey
Brennan
Gen. Shithead
Keith Oberman
Comey
This post was edited on 11/14/24 at 1:50 pm
Posted on 11/14/24 at 1:49 pm to Ham Solo
quote:
Schiff isn't the biggest target, but I want to see that guy in cuffs so badly.
Same. And Raskin and penguin.
Posted on 11/14/24 at 1:50 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
Regarding Brennan - he absolutely lied to Congress in 2014.
Right on, I posted this in another thread.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Robert Barnes touched on it here.
quote:
The 51 intel officers and the people who organized that effort likely violated some federal law for conspiring to interfere with an election - I imagine some of the same laws stretched to go after the electors/Jan 6 stuff could be used here. If you can't make it work, you can't make it work. But I would 100% support exploring that, as it was an egregiously corrupt effort.
I forgot about an underreported piece of info that is the biggest part of the scandal. Blinken put the letter in motion!
LINK
This post was edited on 11/14/24 at 2:08 pm
Popular
Back to top
