- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Hypothetical-Harris wins the 2024 election and the Minnesota daycare fraud uncovered 2026
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:12 am
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:12 am
How hard does the media work to bury it to protect Walz?
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:21 am to armtackledawg
Whistleblowers would be in prison or watching grass grow from the roots point of view.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:23 am to armtackledawg
quote:
How hard does the media work to bury it to protect Walz?
Why do you assume the DOJ wouldn't prosecute?
You do know the largest federal prosecution of MN fraud started with Biden's DOJ when she was VP, right?
Why would you assume new fraud wouldn't be prosecuted the same way?
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:26 am to SlowFlowPro
She or the DNC handlers picked Waltz for a reason. Duh...
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:26 am to armtackledawg
Doesn't matter.
At the end of the day, republicant's have the ability to do something about it and refuse to. That fact has been documented here.
Why?
Because they are in on it too.
At the end of the day, republicant's have the ability to do something about it and refuse to. That fact has been documented here.
Why?
Because they are in on it too.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:27 am to dalefla
quote:
She or the DNC handlers picked Waltz for a reason. Duh...
And?
That doesn't answer the question. Walz was Governor of MN when the Biden DOJ started the largest federal fraud prosecution in MN history
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:34 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Why do you assume the DOJ wouldn't prosecute?
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:42 am to RohanGonzales
Yeah, as if the Democrats are above the control prosecution for their benefit. As if they won't frick up to get nothing at the end.
MN was a fraudulent money train they couldn't destroy.
MN was a fraudulent money train they couldn't destroy.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:45 am to RohanGonzales
You do realize the Biden DOJ, while Kamala was VP, had the largest federal investigation/prosecution of fraud in MN, while Walz was governor, right?
Posted on 6/19/26 at 8:08 am to SlowFlowPro
Wasn’t that same fraud case shelved during the Biden Harris term ?
Posted on 6/19/26 at 8:12 am to Nosevens
quote:
Wasn’t that same fraud case shelved during the Biden Harris term ?
It was not shelved
The prosecutions went forward. The first trials were started in June of 2024
quote:
On the eve of the closing day of a federal fraud trial in Minneapolis, a woman drove up in a Mazda to a juror’s home holding a Hallmark gift bag emblazoned with butterflies and flowers. Inside were wads of $100, $50 and $20 bills totaling roughly $120,000.
The juror in the case, in which defendants are charged with using a charity to steal millions of dollars, was not home Sunday night when the unusual package arrived. But a relative of the juror grabbed it, according to an F.B.I. agent’s account.
“This is for Juror 52,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Joe Thompson quoted the woman saying, according to a story in Sahan Journal, an online news organization. “Tell her there will be another bag for her if she votes to acquit.”
When the juror, a 23-year-old woman, got home and learned about the dropped-off cash, she called her local police department, which reported the attempted bribery to federal officials.
quote:
June 3, 2024
The next trial was February 2025
This is ignoring all the pleas in that time period
Posted on 6/19/26 at 8:13 am to RohanGonzales
Hes always defending the left 
Posted on 6/19/26 at 8:14 am to SDVTiger
I'm defending the truth, logic, and proper rhetoric only.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 8:23 am to armtackledawg
Any reporting on this matter would have been drowned out by Harris' incessant cackling and inappropriate laughter.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 8:29 am to armtackledawg
There would be no Minnesota daycare fraud investigation. There would be nothing for the period to cover up because the DOJ would not investigate a Dem. They would be after Trump, Vance, etc.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 8:43 am to armtackledawg
quote:
How hard does the media work to bury it to protect Walz?
No legs. It wouldn't have happened. ...at all.
The left likes to claim that the Biden administration was already investigating the fraud within the day care centers, but they were looking into the Child Nutrition Program - "Feeding Our Future", as well as basic medicaid fraud.
It really wasn't them going after laundering money through day care centers. ...or fake day care centers.
This post was edited on 6/19/26 at 8:45 am
Posted on 6/19/26 at 8:48 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Why do you assume the DOJ wouldn't prosecute?
quote:
She or the DNC handlers picked Waltz for a reason.
quote:
And? That doesn't answer the question.
For an “Attorney”, you consistently struggle with any critical thinking capacity to get from point A to B without being explicitly told such.
If you had that ability, you’d understand he actually answered your question above. But here it is again for you:
quote:
She or the DNC handlers picked Waltz for a reason.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 9:01 am to armtackledawg
We’d have never heard about it.
Popular
Back to top

8








