- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Hunter Biden is worth $156 million
Posted on 10/15/20 at 12:51 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Posted on 10/15/20 at 12:51 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:Luckily Mitch and Trump left the cupboard pretty empty.
He will appoint left wing judges
quote:And Obama was gonna take the guns too. What is Biden really going to do here?
guns? Biden is running the most anti-2nd amendment platforms in recent history.
quote:Maybe equally so, but I don’t think Biden has the ability to do it anyways.
That is way more anti-libertarian than tariffs on china.
quote:That’s bad, unfortunately the GOP platform seems to mostly see those rights as inconvenient when it comes to the way more powerful government‘s enforcement (kicked out of college vs. thrown out of prison).
Due process rights? Biden wants to reinstate the ridiculous title ix regulations that rob accused college boys of a fair process.
quote:He can’t ban charter schools. So this is stupid. And charter schools aren’t better on average. They’re just more variable, as some are far better and some are far worse.
He wants to ban charter schools and is a huge opponent of school choice in general.
quote:More taxes concerns me, but Trump raised taxes as well (tariffs). And the GOP is just as big government as the Ds unfortunately, so we get put aside that fantasy that I used to fall for when the Tea Party movement sold it pretty convincingly before they pushed out one of the few (Amash) who actually held those views (Massie is still pretty consistent).
He is the candidate of more taxes, more regulations, and a larger government.
quote:I don’t know why this is inherently bad or good, just like Trump’s coalition is quite disjointed. I guess it’s all a reflection of the disjointed political parties.
The entire reason he might win is because he has assembled this disjointed coalition of suburban right-leaning voters, avg democrats, and the progressive left who want trump gone.
quote:Probably. Luckily the bar is low.
If he wins, there will be a lot of people asking "ok, we got trump out.....but now what"?
I just don’t know what you want me to say. I’m not voting for Trump. I didn’t in 2016, but I just didn’t vote. This time I’m going to vote for the only Democrat, in any position at any level that I can recall, in my life. It’s sad that we’re here, but pretty much anyone in the R primary but the doofus who is in office would have not led me to this (Rubio, Cruz, Rand, Kasich).
1
Posted on 10/15/20 at 12:54 am to GeauxTrain
quote:
The Left wouldn't be acting like this if Biden had the lead they claim he does.
Like you can base anything off of the reaction of the left. I would say that Rudy’s desperation is more telling, but who knows with Rudy. What is probably telling though, is that Trump is campaigning in a state he won by 9 points in 2016, that has few electoral votes and is not that important to Biden as it has little chance of tipping the election for him.
Posted on 10/15/20 at 1:00 am to buckeye_vol
quote:
The Trump Organization. What other “company” would I be referring to?
I was thinking maybe one he promised to divest from?
Share a link that establishes this promise. I only remember him saying he’d relinquish complete control while president.
This post was edited on 10/15/20 at 1:03 am
Posted on 10/15/20 at 1:03 am to buckeye_vol
Lots of things are telling in lots of ways if you look at them from lots of different perspectives.
For instance, is it telling that the Biden campaign determined that it needed to change gears from laying low and "letting Trump beat Trump" to becoming much more proactive and instituting a notably more aggressive campaign schedule? Thereby opening Biden up to uncomfortable questions and more opportunity for "gaffes"? When the majority of polls have Biden significantly ahead? Sure, that all could be telling, but could also be people reading into it too much. Who really knows.
For instance, is it telling that the Biden campaign determined that it needed to change gears from laying low and "letting Trump beat Trump" to becoming much more proactive and instituting a notably more aggressive campaign schedule? Thereby opening Biden up to uncomfortable questions and more opportunity for "gaffes"? When the majority of polls have Biden significantly ahead? Sure, that all could be telling, but could also be people reading into it too much. Who really knows.
Posted on 10/15/20 at 1:06 am to David_DJS
quote:I guess he didn’t specifically promise to divest, but it sure seemed like that’s what he meant at the time:
Share a link that establishes this promise. I only remember him saying he’d relinquish complete control while president.
Trump's vow to leave business raises more questions
quote:But you’re right. Business operations doesn’t mean divestment, but I guess I gave him the benefit of the doubt (my mistake).
Hence, legal documents are being crafted which take me completely out of business operations. The presidency is a far more important task
Posted on 10/15/20 at 1:11 am to buckeye_vol
quote:
But you’re right. Business operations doesn’t mean divestment, but I guess I gave him the benefit of the doubt (my mistake).
Yes. You were wrong.
And your belief that a business owner must sell his/her business if elected to Congress or president/VP is peculiar, or is this just a Trump thing?
Posted on 10/15/20 at 1:17 am to buckeye_vol
I’m sorry to say: the gop isn’t going back to what it was, and frankly it Shouldn’t
And I also think the dem party’s future is Bernie and warren people rather than Biden and beto
The neoliberal consensus that dominated both parties for much of the 90s and 2000s is eroding all over the western world. Don’t know what to think of that, to be honest.
Free trade is on the chopping block, as are international bodies and the tolerance of large, concentrated institutions, whether govt or market.
Tucker Carlson, Josh hawley, Tom cotton, Ron Desantis, etc are the gop of the future. A populist party of blue collar whites and (imo) Hispanics eventually. It will be a party that stresses capitalism at home but with a govt role in preserving an economic identity. It will be a party that is ardently against multiculturalism and moral relativism.
Bernie, tlaib, Omar, Warren, etc are the future of the dems. They will be a party of staunch social democrats, advocating for very high govt spending as percentage of gdp, vast new govt programs, and cultural Marxism: critical race theory, belief in identity based on race, gender, etc will dominate the party. This party will stress that liberal democracy is insufficient to address key problems. This party will also be firmly against big business and corporations- wealth taxes will be part of party platform.
liberalism is going to be on the chopping block, and both parties will be swinging that ax downward: free markets, multiculturalism, individuals over groups, international
Unions over national identity, free speech, objective truth, large institutions.......these key tenets of liberal democracy are under threat
And I also think the dem party’s future is Bernie and warren people rather than Biden and beto
The neoliberal consensus that dominated both parties for much of the 90s and 2000s is eroding all over the western world. Don’t know what to think of that, to be honest.
Free trade is on the chopping block, as are international bodies and the tolerance of large, concentrated institutions, whether govt or market.
Tucker Carlson, Josh hawley, Tom cotton, Ron Desantis, etc are the gop of the future. A populist party of blue collar whites and (imo) Hispanics eventually. It will be a party that stresses capitalism at home but with a govt role in preserving an economic identity. It will be a party that is ardently against multiculturalism and moral relativism.
Bernie, tlaib, Omar, Warren, etc are the future of the dems. They will be a party of staunch social democrats, advocating for very high govt spending as percentage of gdp, vast new govt programs, and cultural Marxism: critical race theory, belief in identity based on race, gender, etc will dominate the party. This party will stress that liberal democracy is insufficient to address key problems. This party will also be firmly against big business and corporations- wealth taxes will be part of party platform.
liberalism is going to be on the chopping block, and both parties will be swinging that ax downward: free markets, multiculturalism, individuals over groups, international
Unions over national identity, free speech, objective truth, large institutions.......these key tenets of liberal democracy are under threat
Posted on 10/15/20 at 1:29 am to buckeye_vol
quote:
Also, the cult followings of Trump, Bernie, Obama, etc. make all of their flaws way worse, and Biden doesn’t have that following.
You serious here? A huge negative about Biden is the fear he is just a figurehead and will do as told. A cult following goes with their assigned marching orders. Biden absolutely has a cult following even if the members don’t really care about him individually.
Posted on 10/15/20 at 4:43 am to buckeye_vol
I’m shocked you are on the side of the socialists.
Posted on 10/15/20 at 4:47 am to DavidTheGnome
Find the net worth of Joe’s siblings. Do it.
Posted on 10/15/20 at 5:59 am to DavidTheGnome
quote:
Hunter Biden is worth $156 million
This fact, plus what we already know about this crackhead, dead brother-widow-fricking, hooker-banging/knocker-upping, support-dodging, non-Ukraine-speaking, douche-bagging mother fricker tells you all you need to know about his father.
And goddam you are cynical mother fricker if you are going to vote for that POS, rotten to the core crook, former man Joe Biden who created the adult child Hunter.
Posted on 10/15/20 at 6:06 am to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
These people are disgusting filth of the highest order, and people are worried about meanie tweets
Im just glad little Hunter didn't grow up in a racial jungle, who knows how the little tyke would have turned out, a crackhead probably
Posted on 10/15/20 at 6:08 am to PhDoogan
"How dare you! My other son served his country and died from cancer! Focus on that one!"
/Biden debate pivot
/Biden debate pivot
Posted on 10/15/20 at 6:36 am to lsuguy84
Let’s be clear. The only “evidence” in this story of this guy’s net worth is the allegation of someone who wants money from him. This is NOT a finding by the Court.
quote:The very first image in the article was the Agreed Order for child support. Certainly you are familiar with the word “agreed.”. Is he a PoS otherwise? Very possibly.
And he still won’t support the kid. What a piece of shite.
Posted on 10/15/20 at 6:40 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:They do not care. It supports their preconceptions, so they accept it as true.
You realize that number is totally made up, right? The article you posted shows the pleadings filed by the mother of the child citing news articles are her sources of what his income is lol.
You understand this.
Posted on 10/15/20 at 6:42 am to AggieHank86
quote:
They do not care. It supports their preconceptions, so they accept it as true.
Tell us more about "fine people on both sides".
Posted on 10/15/20 at 6:52 am to Ollieoxenfree99
quote:Did I say that the Far Left is any more objective than the Far Right?
Tell us more about "fine people on both sides".
I did not.
I simply said that the vast majority of this forum will swallow (no matter how objectively-preposterous) ANYTHING negative about the Left and ANYTHING positive about the Right ... hook, line and sinker.
Then ask for more.
This post was edited on 10/15/20 at 6:53 am
Posted on 10/15/20 at 6:55 am to DavidTheGnome
So this means either Hunter received over $300M from his shady dealings and gave good ol' Dad half...
Or they're overstating his wealth and he's only worth $78M... and STILL fought child support case in AR.
Or they're overstating his wealth and he's only worth $78M... and STILL fought child support case in AR.
Posted on 10/15/20 at 6:59 am to buckeye_vol
here is my threshold:
felony / not a felony
It's not complicated.
felony / not a felony
It's not complicated.
Posted on 10/15/20 at 7:00 am to AggieHank86
Your constant need to point out the speck in your conservative brothers' eye is getting old.
This post was edited on 10/15/20 at 7:02 am
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News