- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 1/30/21 at 12:56 pm to lsufan1971
quote:Dammit, it's HIPAA not HIPPA. The HIPAA regulations already state that almost any law enforcement can obtain medical records without the patient's consent.
Two issues I see with what they want to here. First I don’t see how they can get around HIPPA. If your not adjudicated then any medical information couldn’t be released by a medical provider without changing the law.
Posted on 1/31/21 at 10:05 am to SOKAL
quote:
Hopefully you are correct, but the way things are today I find little comfort in hearing, "it could never happen here."
I'm not saying it could never happen. I'm saying hold your angst for something that is more tangible.
This bill is just performance asshattery. It will never see the House floor. When a gun control bill actually has a chance of being debated, then you can start the hand wringing and whining.
Posted on 1/31/21 at 10:07 am to Dday63
I’m legit concerned. They are doing or plan to do everything on their agenda.
What is stopping them?
What is stopping them?
Posted on 1/31/21 at 10:10 am to dakarx
Whole lot of infringement in OP
Posted on 1/31/21 at 10:29 am to WhitewaterDawg
quote:
I’m legit concerned. They are doing or plan to do everything on their agenda.
What is stopping them?
Since they own the House, Senate and Presidency...
Nothing is stopping them.
Posted on 1/31/21 at 10:33 am to WWII Collector
And it will NEVER be enough. It will start with AR’s and will end up being every gun.
Sad and scary times. I truly don’t to relate to people ok and even happy with events of the past year. It’s terrifying.
Sad and scary times. I truly don’t to relate to people ok and even happy with events of the past year. It’s terrifying.
Posted on 1/31/21 at 10:33 am to Dday63
quote:
I'm not saying it could never happen. I'm saying hold your angst for something that is more tangible.
This bill is just performance asshattery. It will never see the House floor. When a gun control bill actually has a chance of being debated, then you can start the hand wringing and whining.
You're right. Always best to wait until the wolf is at the hen house door.
Posted on 1/31/21 at 10:47 am to homesicktiger
quote:
You're right. Always best to wait until the wolf is at the hen house door.
No, but there is no reason to be outraged over a crazy, over reaching bill that has no chance of advancement.
People in this thread are saying "I told you the Dems would try something like this!" This is not an "I told you so" moment. This is a clearly unconstitutional bill that has zero chance of advancing.
You don't have to wait until the wolf is at the hen house door, but you might want to wait until a wolf actually exists.
Posted on 1/31/21 at 10:54 am to Dday63
You are a Democrat, yes?
Posted on 1/31/21 at 11:00 am to Dday63
quote:
No, but there is no reason to be outraged over a crazy, over reaching bill that has no chance of advancement.
That is what they said about Obamacare...
Posted on 1/31/21 at 11:05 am to Dday63
quote:
No, but there is no reason to be outraged over a crazy, over reaching bill that has no chance of advancement.
That entire bill may not have a chance but a lot of what is in that bill sure does like semi auto ban and magazine limits.
quote:
People in this thread are saying "I told you the Dems would try something like this!" This is not an "I told you so" moment. This is a clearly unconstitutional bill that has zero chance of advancing.
The democrats could care less the constitution.
quote:
You don't have to wait until the wolf is at the hen house door, but you might want to wait until a wolf actually exists.
That wolf has been around for over a century. There was a time we had no limits on types of firearms, having them shipped to our homes, no prohibited classes, no restrictions on interstate travel, etc. After a century at the very least we face bans on folding stocks, registration via the NFA and magazine limits so some fudd can tell us hunting is still allowed.
Posted on 1/31/21 at 11:05 am to wickowick
121, 125, 127, 130 all Shelia Jackson Lee, all introduced on 4 Jan 21. None have moved past committees yet.
Posted on 1/31/21 at 11:08 am to Kino74
And registry is simply a list of who to go frick with first. California showed that right off the bat to a citizen legally complying.
This is not about compliance. It’s about 100% control, And if they need the guns they have some serious shite planned for us.
This is not about compliance. It’s about 100% control, And if they need the guns they have some serious shite planned for us.
Posted on 1/31/21 at 11:15 am to WhitewaterDawg
quote:
This is not about compliance. It’s about 100% control, And if they need the guns they have some serious shite planned for us.
Gun control has always been about control. The funny thing about it as the supporters believe "they have to do something" yet never care about the results of their actions.
Posted on 1/31/21 at 11:18 am to dakarx
quote:
HR 127 text released - gun control on steriods
This will be the bill that the Republicans and 'moderate Dems' 'boldly fight' and defeat, only to turn around and 'compromise' on what the Uni-Party really wants
Posted on 1/31/21 at 11:19 am to Dday63
quote:
This is a clearly unconstitutional bill that has zero chance of advancing.
You are clearly naive and probably retarded.
Posted on 1/31/21 at 11:19 am to dakarx
Just because it’s introduced doesn’t mean it’ll pass. I don’t think y’all realize that nothing is going to make it through YET
Posted on 1/31/21 at 11:38 am to Jumbo_Gumbo
quote:
Did you read that part that the persons spouse and any previous spouses have to be part of the evaluation? Lol
Previous spouses? I would be toast if not for that boating accident.
Page 5 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News