- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/29/21 at 2:26 pm to GardenDistrictTiger
quote:
They are pushing laws that will finally make it to the Supreme Court for a ruling. They don't understand that they will lose.
The Democratic party spent the better part of the last 20 years trying to convince everyone that the Constitution is a living breathing document that needs to be updated and revised often to match the times we live in. Never mind the fact that their is a way to amend the Constitution but their mantra has and continues to be received like a turd in the punch bowl and their is no support for their agenda.
Fast forward to the last 4 years, now their play book is to ignore the Constitution all together and force feed their ideology down everyone's throat.
If you should have learned anything these last few months it's that you can not count on the SC to up hold the Constitution either and just to make sure Biden will add Justices to the courts before 2022.
People knew the consequences of this election and now we see it unfolding. Period.
Posted on 1/29/21 at 2:45 pm to GardenDistrictTiger
quote:
They will have to overcome the Judiciary Act of 1869 and its precedent. FDR tried this to force feed the New Deal in 1937. He lost then and this will lose now.
I get what you are saying normally would not think twice about it..
But in the world we live in....
Posted on 1/29/21 at 3:16 pm to dakarx
If these worthless politicians really wanted to make America safer they should build more prisons.
Commit a violent crime-go to jail for 20 years with no parole.
Commit a crime with a firearm-go to jail for life with no chance for parole.
If the penalties for committing crimes were extreme the vast number of people wouldnt commit them. And the ones who do break the law would be in a place where they couldnt do it again. Prison.
And before someone says it would be too expensive consider the costs saved by those persons not being on welfare, having babies (that taxpayers pay for), and also the costs of all the crimes they would have committed if they were free.
Commit a violent crime-go to jail for 20 years with no parole.
Commit a crime with a firearm-go to jail for life with no chance for parole.
If the penalties for committing crimes were extreme the vast number of people wouldnt commit them. And the ones who do break the law would be in a place where they couldnt do it again. Prison.
And before someone says it would be too expensive consider the costs saved by those persons not being on welfare, having babies (that taxpayers pay for), and also the costs of all the crimes they would have committed if they were free.
Posted on 1/29/21 at 3:20 pm to GardenDistrictTiger
quote:
FDR tried this to force feed the New Deal in 1937. He lost then and this will lose now
If I recall correctly, the Court started issuing Democrat friendly opinions in an effort to demonstrate that stacking was not necessary.
IDK if we have already seen that effect in action with this Court, or whether if the Court, like the rest of the establishment just hates Trump that much.
Posted on 1/29/21 at 3:27 pm to dakarx
Pathetic and laughable, not to mention possibly unconstitutional on its face.
Posted on 1/29/21 at 3:36 pm to dakarx
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/30/21 at 6:05 pm
Posted on 1/29/21 at 3:45 pm to 98eagle
quote:
If these worthless politicians really wanted to make America safer they should build more prisons.
Commit a violent crime-go to jail for 20 years with no parole.
Commit a crime with a firearm-go to jail for life with no chance for parole.
If the penalties for committing crimes were extreme the vast number of people wouldnt commit them. And the ones who do break the law would be in a place where they couldnt do it again. Prison.
And before someone says it would be too expensive consider the costs saved by those persons not being on welfare, having babies (that taxpayers pay for), and also the costs of all the crimes they would have committed if they were free.
Add murder with no doubt....like 15 videos of you doing it ....One trip out back to the rice paddy, dig your own hole and climb in. $5 to the back of the head, no last meal, fifty years of challenges and tons of legal work.
Posted on 1/29/21 at 3:54 pm to 98eagle
Combs also pointed to the state's arrest of a man who had attempted to comply with the law as a major deterrent to many gun owners who feared trying to comply with the law could unwittingly place them in legal jeopardy.
"Moreover, many gun owners are resistant to registration schemes because they know that registration will lead to confiscations and arrests," he said. "And the news reports during the registration period about DOJ using the system to get warrants and conduct raids probably confirmed that viewpoint and made a lot of gun owners nervous."
The people in California knew it would just be a list of people to harass and round up. Our Govt officials are human scum.
"Moreover, many gun owners are resistant to registration schemes because they know that registration will lead to confiscations and arrests," he said. "And the news reports during the registration period about DOJ using the system to get warrants and conduct raids probably confirmed that viewpoint and made a lot of gun owners nervous."
The people in California knew it would just be a list of people to harass and round up. Our Govt officials are human scum.
Posted on 1/29/21 at 4:12 pm to zztop1234
quote:
system for new purchases, if little TYRONE had a rough childhood
Expose it as racist, that'll teach 'em
This post was edited on 1/29/21 at 4:15 pm
Posted on 1/29/21 at 4:13 pm to dakarx
Y'all are acting like this bill is already on Biden's desk, waiting for his signature. It won't even make it out of committee.
Posted on 1/29/21 at 4:16 pm to Dday63
Something is coming. I doubt it will be as ridiculous as Jackson-Lee’s Bill. But, BS gun legislation is coming hard and fast.
I hope there is less compliance than there was in California.
I hope there is less compliance than there was in California.
Posted on 1/29/21 at 4:18 pm to WhitewaterDawg
quote:
I hope there is less compliance than there was in California.
California compliance is around 3%. Should be lower nationwide.
Where are they going to house all of those millions of new felons?
Posted on 1/29/21 at 4:18 pm to Jumbo_Gumbo
quote:
Too bad i lost mine in a boating accident
The bill also requires flotation devices on all semi-auto rifles while boating.
Posted on 1/29/21 at 4:19 pm to Vestigial Morgan
quote:
So...you fall behind on your 800 tax....they confiscate your rifle?
“No sir, I do not have those guns. Have not for a while. Not sure what to tell you. No, you may not search the house.”
As much as I hate to admit it, I would rather pay a lawyer than pay this kind of fine.
Posted on 1/29/21 at 4:24 pm to TDsngumbo
quote:
SCOTUS has to step in if that is passed.
After what we have seen from them lately I don't trust they would strike it down.
Posted on 1/29/21 at 4:25 pm to dakarx
Dems don't remember how bad the Assault Weapons Ban hurt them in the first Clinton term.
Posted on 1/29/21 at 4:27 pm to dakarx
Repeat after me. "I will not comply"
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News