- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How will our Rinos like HHTM sleep knowing this justice is on bench
Posted on 3/22/22 at 12:54 am to Kinetic_Response
Posted on 3/22/22 at 12:54 am to Kinetic_Response
quote:
She further said that she wanted “to understand this category of nonpedophiles who obtain child pornography.” As one of the people responsible for developing the sentencing guidelines, one would hope that she would want to understand both the offenses and the offenders. To do otherwise would be rather irresponsible, IMO.
You are making excuses. Period
Posted on 3/22/22 at 12:56 am to llfshoals
quote:
Probably is HHTM, trying to argue for a very bad choice for the Supreme Court under a different name to try and change the argument without the automatic negation of the comments because every knows HHTM is a moron
This seems likely. This account appears out of nowhere 17 minutes after this thread is created?
Someone spotted this thread, decided they wanted to respond, created a new account, logged in, and posted that response all within 17 minutes.
That's not a random passerby. HHTM is a good guess.
Posted on 3/22/22 at 12:57 am to Kinetic_Response
quote:
think that a better analogy would be two weed offenders (in states that have not decriminalized) ... one who buys weed to get high and one who buys weed to self-medicate cancer symptoms.
Is it not within the purview of a Sentencing Commission to understand the difference between those two offenders? Should we not EXPECT a member of a Sentencing Commission to attempt to obtain such an understanding?
Is it not reasonable for a Sentencing Commission to AT LEAST examine whether those two offenders should be sentenced to identical periods of incarceration?
I sense that this is the sort of forum on which someone will now say that I am equating child pornography with a minor drug offense. No, I am not. Obviously, one offense (child porn) is more serious than the other. I am simply examining a parallel in sentencing issues.
No. Couple what she said with her actions in sentencing..
You are excusing... defending. It sick.
Posted on 3/22/22 at 12:59 am to Jjdoc
quote:Sounds familiar doesn’t it?
You are excusing... defending. It sick.
Posted on 3/22/22 at 1:00 am to Jjdoc
quote:
You are making excuses. Period
"Your Honor, go easy on me. I don't rape the girls, I just kidnap them and rent them out to men who do!"
"Your Honor, go easy on me. I didn't kill that woman for enjoyment, I killed her because her husband paid me to!"
Imagine that sort of reasoning actually moving your "give a frick meter"...
Posted on 3/22/22 at 1:01 am to Kinetic_Response
quote:
sentencing between the clinical pedophile and the non-pedophile collector,
Wow!!! How sick is what you are doing right now!!
Posted on 3/22/22 at 1:04 am to Jjdoc
quote:Now you see why he made this alter.
Wow!!! How sick is what you are doing right now!!
Would have revealed too much about his predilection for kiddie porn.
Posted on 3/22/22 at 1:43 am to Palm Beach Tiger
quote:
The republican party is only less shitty than the democratic party.
And only slightly. I scrutinize every supreme court justice because it's the branch of government that fascinates me the most, and I'm a fan of this one. Didn't think the Democrats or Biden had it in them to pick someone so qualified that wasn't hard left leaning. Pretty decent bench with a slight Republican edge, which I prefer, as long as they stay away from Roe v Wade.
Posted on 3/22/22 at 4:36 am to Kinetic_Response
quote:
pure mischaracterization of her words for cheap political gain
OMIGOD!!
can you further explain this phenomenon/?
I have been paying close attention to political agenda for over 50 years and have never witnessed such a thing.
Could you give a couple of examples of such behavior from recent political activity?? My memory is becoming faulty and perhaps you could resurrect some long forgotten trend.
tia.
Posted on 3/22/22 at 4:42 am to Froman
quote:
as long as they stay away from Roe v Wade
so - once they screw up a decision it must be honored for all time in service of stare decisis?
Also - just for my benefit - could you point to that phrase in the US Constitution that supports the argument??
And is the dedication to that decision more important than freedom of speech, or right to bear arms, or free from arbitrary governmental mandate, fair elections, et al??
Posted on 3/22/22 at 4:45 am to Azkiger
quote:
Someone spotted this thread, decided they wanted to respond, created a new account, logged in, and posted that response all within 17 minutes.
WOW - now that is impressive.
Posted on 3/22/22 at 6:34 am to Jjdoc
They're just glad they have someone on the bench to call them racist every day. There's a sect of Republicans who are addicted to losing and self defenestration to the left.
Posted on 3/22/22 at 6:39 am to Jjdoc
It's almost like this topic will lure someone to create a sock account so he can show his support and interest in owning child porn.
Good grief.
Good grief.
Posted on 3/22/22 at 6:42 am to Jjdoc
quote:
she mistakenly thought that child porn predators were pedos....
quote:
she mistakenly thought
quote:
mistakenly
:castle.gif:
Posted on 3/22/22 at 6:45 am to Great Plains Drifter
yup we'll vote in better ones next time
we'll get'em next election cycle
because that's proven to work
NOT
list one 2-6 year segment of time when the repubs truly represented us. it has never happened. NEVER.
and still won't until we take some drastic measures
first is vetting our "potential officials" long before primaries
a choice between a poop-sicle, and urine ice, is not a choice
thats what we have been given for decades
we (as citizens) are stuck in a loop between Munchausen and Stockholm syndromes
we'll get'em next election cycle
because that's proven to work
NOT
list one 2-6 year segment of time when the repubs truly represented us. it has never happened. NEVER.
and still won't until we take some drastic measures
first is vetting our "potential officials" long before primaries
a choice between a poop-sicle, and urine ice, is not a choice
thats what we have been given for decades
we (as citizens) are stuck in a loop between Munchausen and Stockholm syndromes
Posted on 3/22/22 at 6:48 am to Jjdoc
Sentencing Commission hearing
Witness from DoJ:
“Not all child porn violators are pedophiles. Some have other motivations.”
KBJ:
“Really? I did not know that. Please tell me more ….”
KBJ opponents a decade later:
Reeeeeee
There are lots of reasons to criticize this woman’s politics. This exchange just is not one of them. Sorry.
Witness from DoJ:
“Not all child porn violators are pedophiles. Some have other motivations.”
KBJ:
“Really? I did not know that. Please tell me more ….”
KBJ opponents a decade later:
Reeeeeee
There are lots of reasons to criticize this woman’s politics. This exchange just is not one of them. Sorry.
Posted on 3/22/22 at 7:02 am to Kinetic_Response
quote:
Sentencing Commission hearing
Witness from DoJ:
“Not all child porn violators are pedophiles. Some have other motivations.”
KBJ:
“Really? I did not know that. Please tell me more ….”
KBJ opponents a decade later:
Reeeeeee
KBJ sock account supporter:
*spurt*spurt*spurt*
Posted on 3/22/22 at 7:12 am to Bulldogblitz
HHTM's descent into madness:
Claims he'll suck Marco Rubio's cock
Claims Trump broke him to the point of needing therapy/medication
Claims he's a dramatic, gay man
Creates a fake account to defend child porn owners
Claims he'll suck Marco Rubio's cock
Claims Trump broke him to the point of needing therapy/medication
Claims he's a dramatic, gay man
Creates a fake account to defend child porn owners
Posted on 3/22/22 at 7:13 am to Kinetic_Response
quote:
oddly-pugnacious
Why the hyphen?
Did you vote for trump or the demented racist lifetime political idiot from Delaware?
Posted on 3/22/22 at 7:21 am to Kinetic_Response
quote:
KBJ opponents a decade later: Reeeeeee
Ok. Which of you goofs created this pedo alter?
Popular
Back to top



2




