- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
How The World’s Richest 10% Are Destroying The Planet For Everyone Else
Posted on 5/21/25 at 11:01 am
Posted on 5/21/25 at 11:01 am

How The World’s Richest 10% Are Destroying The Planet For Everyone Else
In a nutshell
The richest 10% of people are responsible for up to 67% of global environmental damage—including most carbon emissions, biodiversity loss, and resource overuse—while the bottom 50% contribute almost nothing to these crises.
Changing the consumption habits of the wealthiest individuals could significantly reduce environmental harm. If the top 20% adopted more sustainable lifestyles similar to high-income Europeans, global ecological pressure could drop by as much as 36%.
Policies targeting high-end consumption, not across-the-board restrictions, may be the most effective and fair path forward, especially if focused on sectors like luxury travel, meat-heavy diets, and resource-intensive goods.
GRONINGEN, Netherlands — While you debate whether to take that vacation or buy organic groceries, someone just burned through your entire year’s worth of environmental impact in a single weekend getaway. New research reveals that the richest 10% of people aren’t just living large; they’re actively breaking the planet’s life support systems.
A new international study published in the journal Nature analyzed data from 168 countries and found that the global top 10% of consumers are responsible for up to 67% of planetary boundary breaches. This essentially means a tiny sliver of humanity is wrecking the environment for everyone else. The research examined six critical environmental areas: climate change, land use, biodiversity loss, and the nitrogen, phosphorus, and freshwater cycles that keep our ecosystems functioning.
LINK
Posted on 5/21/25 at 11:04 am to djmed
i.e., the USA and Western World
frick these idiots
frick these idiots
Posted on 5/21/25 at 11:04 am to djmed
Muh planetary boundary breaches! 

Posted on 5/21/25 at 11:09 am to djmed
Posted on 5/21/25 at 11:12 am to djmed
These are the people telling us to ride the bus and eat kale.
Posted on 5/21/25 at 11:17 am to djmed
But the solution is for the bottom 90% to eat ze bugs and live in ze pod.
Posted on 5/21/25 at 11:25 am to djmed
I am having a great time "Destroying the planet".
frick those concern trolls.
frick those concern trolls.
Posted on 5/21/25 at 11:26 am to djmed
"Do as I say, not what I do."
Posted on 5/21/25 at 11:27 am to djmed
I’m not going to be blamed for the climate BS. frick off.
Posted on 5/21/25 at 11:59 am to udtiger
quote:
i.e., the USA and Western World
frick these idiots
The "study" was funded and conducted by the Chinese (govt). Didn't see any mention of coal fired electical power. But I'm sure that outlawing farming of animals for meat will be great for biodiversity. MSN should interview Mr. Gates and ask how many cricket meals he's eaten this week.
Posted on 5/21/25 at 12:01 pm to djmed
And the solution is communism, being cold and in the dark, food shortages and famine, repression and mass liquidation?
Cuba says hi...
Cuba says hi...
Posted on 5/21/25 at 1:19 pm to djmed
quote:
Policies targeting high-end consumption, not across-the-board restrictions, may be the most effective and fair path forward, especially if focused on sectors like luxury travel, meat-heavy diets, and resource-intensive goods.
So I’m supposed to work hard, make a lot of money, but then not spend it on nice things? frick off
Posted on 5/21/25 at 1:26 pm to djmed
Go look at the rivers and air in south east Asia and tell me the United States is the problem
Posted on 5/21/25 at 1:27 pm to djmed
Bill gates says don’t worry about his carbon footprint.
Posted on 5/21/25 at 1:54 pm to djmed
I don’t care AT ALL about the richest’s consumption.
There’s a significant part of this demographic that are amoral locusts that would happily kill 10,000 people for a 5% increase in their stock portfolio.
I’m fine with eating some of the rich.
There’s a significant part of this demographic that are amoral locusts that would happily kill 10,000 people for a 5% increase in their stock portfolio.
I’m fine with eating some of the rich.
Posted on 5/21/25 at 1:56 pm to TrueTiger
Paraphrasing James Lindsay.
quote:
Degrowth Marxists want you to freeze to death while starving in the dark.
Posted on 5/21/25 at 2:17 pm to djmed
The continued destruction of our planet is insane. Those running things care not about the people but their bottom line. But as much as we blame the rich, it is we common people, doing the footwork and buying their environmentally destroying products. We are just as guilty.
Even communist countries like China are polluting the earth. smh
Even communist countries like China are polluting the earth. smh
Posted on 5/21/25 at 2:20 pm to djmed
quote:
If the top 20% adopted more sustainable lifestyles similar to high-income Europeans, global ecological pressure could drop by as much as 36%.

Popular
Back to top
