- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How the St. George vote broke down by voting precinct
Posted on 10/15/19 at 10:39 am to Tchefuncte Tiger
Posted on 10/15/19 at 10:39 am to Tchefuncte Tiger
It’s mostly unimproved wetlands
Posted on 10/15/19 at 10:41 am to doubleb
My friend lives in 03/056. He voted for St George. I'll have to ask why his neighbors are such light in the sack nancies.
Posted on 10/15/19 at 10:45 am to doubleb
quote:True, the majority of voters within an area that was drawn up arbitrarily by just a handful of people voted yes.
The majority voted yes.
Those same people excluded large areas the second time around where they knew the majority of voters would likely vote against the incorporation. They anticipated those people's wishes which would have created a situation where those voters would be forced to be in the new city against their wishes. Good for them for being sensitive to voters wishes!
Now that they know there are other large areas which also don't want to be incorporated but the organizers didn't anticipate their wishes correctly but you believe that's just too bad, right?
I thought YOU were better than this.....

Posted on 10/15/19 at 10:47 am to The Boat
quote:
My friend lives in 03/056. He voted for St George. I'll have to ask why his neighbors are such light in the sack nancies.
The thing is no one knows how each subdivision, enclave or apartment complex votes. A precinct is just a line on the map used to organize the electorate.
All of your friends neighbors could have voted yes, but an adjacent subdivision could have voted no.
The thing is the law provides a method to “escape”. No one is “stuck”. Neighborhoods can organize and do as they please.
That’s how it works. That’s the American way.
Posted on 10/15/19 at 10:48 am to Tchefuncte Tiger
That site can't be right. It says my precinct has 972 people in it. But 890 people voted on election day and the Sec of State site says turnout was 40%.
Posted on 10/15/19 at 10:50 am to LSURussian
quote:
Now that they know there are other large areas which also don't want to be incorporated but the organizers didn't anticipate their wishes correctly but you believe that's just too bad, right?
It is too bad, but I knew some would vote no.
But you are acting as if SG leaders have the right to change the city of SG simply by a committee vote, and I believe you know that’s not the case; thus I say you are trolling us all.
You know better.
Posted on 10/15/19 at 10:51 am to The Boat
quote:
This map is misleading considering that early voting is not represented... Link?
READ THE BOTTOM OF THE MAP
Posted on 10/15/19 at 10:51 am to PoBoy1
Learn how to use the reply button for the right poster, baw
Posted on 10/15/19 at 10:58 am to LSURussian
You're like the people who said for two years there was no chance Trump would win and laughed at anyone who said otherwise. Now they live in the reality of the Trump Presidency and are relegated to the meager existence of the wrong side of history.
You spent years in opposition to St George high on a pedestal and laughing at those who thought it would happen. Now you're relegated to the St George reality and sewing discord to break it up.
You spent years in opposition to St George high on a pedestal and laughing at those who thought it would happen. Now you're relegated to the St George reality and sewing discord to break it up.
Posted on 10/15/19 at 10:58 am to The Boat
I'm sad my neighborhood voted against it. However, a lot of them are retired and were most likely worried about change or affected by the excessive amount of opposition junk mail that flooded our mailboxes.
Posted on 10/15/19 at 11:00 am to Tchefuncte Tiger
2500 residents, how many registered voters?
I believe that area is mostly that large residential area adjacent to the soccer fields and Walmart. It’s hard to tell if the apartment complexes across Burbank are included or not.
I believe that area is mostly that large residential area adjacent to the soccer fields and Walmart. It’s hard to tell if the apartment complexes across Burbank are included or not.
Posted on 10/15/19 at 11:00 am to Alt26
quote:
So they can either live with the results or move.
So, you think that's their only options? Love it or leave it!
You realize the Better Together jerkwads applied that same logic to the SG organizers who wanted a new city.
"If you don't want to be in East Baton Rouge Parish in an unincorporated area, just MOVE, assholes!!!"
We're now living in Bizarro World......
Posted on 10/15/19 at 11:00 am to doubleb
quote:
2500 residents, how many registered voters?
That site doesn't have correct population numbers.
Posted on 10/15/19 at 11:01 am to PoBoy1
quote:
READ THE BOTTOM OF THE MAP
What???
Could you repeat yourself so the troll can find it.
Posted on 10/15/19 at 11:05 am to The Boat
quote:
That site can't be right. It says my precinct has 972 people in it. But 890 people voted on election day and the Sec of State site says turnout was 40%.
What precinct are you?
Posted on 10/15/19 at 11:05 am to PoBoy1
quote:Thanks. I didn't see that.
This map is misleading considering that early voting is not represented... Link?
READ THE BOTTOM OF THE MAP
I know the data exists to determine the early voters' precincts because that's what determines which card they're given to put into the voting machine to display the ballot for their area.
I'd like to see those early votes included, by precinct, in a final tally.
Posted on 10/15/19 at 11:08 am to Mickey Goldmill
03/003
62% for St George (on election day at least). I was hoping for a little higher but I'll take it.
But not having early voting numbers doesn't give you the full picture. I wish they had the ability to combine those numbers. It's not impossible.
62% for St George (on election day at least). I was hoping for a little higher but I'll take it.
But not having early voting numbers doesn't give you the full picture. I wish they had the ability to combine those numbers. It's not impossible.
This post was edited on 10/15/19 at 11:09 am
Posted on 10/15/19 at 11:10 am to doubleb
quote:When you start reacting like your above comment is when I know you know I'm right.
What???
Could you repeat yourself so the troll can find it.
You stop using logical thoughts and facts to refute what I've posted and resort to name calling and personal attacks.
That's been your SOP for years going back to the first petition drive.
Popular
Back to top


2




