- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How quickly will lib white women change on immigration if we bring in more like this?
Posted on 5/13/25 at 9:57 am to StrongSafety
Posted on 5/13/25 at 9:57 am to StrongSafety
quote:
So it’s almost wasn’t about immigration it was about who yall want to hear and who you don’t.
No, it's about illegal immigration and always has been. Under the Biden administration it changed a bit as they used the CBP One app to grant blanket temporary amnesty to anyone crossing into the country who had filled out the app requesting asylum. This was fed by organizations who have been purposely funding people to go down and create, then shepherd, caravans from Central and South America to specifically come here. These asylum claims have largely been made against gang violence and economic hardship.
The Afrikaners haven't come here illegally, but have requested asylum through the proper channels. Their asylum requests are based on gang violence and government actions against them, this can range from South Africa's Expropriation Act, which allows land redistribution from Afrikaners without compensation to Zimbabwe's forced land seizures. Of special note is South Africa's EFF party's theme song of Kill the Boers.
1
Posted on 5/13/25 at 10:00 am to StrongSafety
quote:
So it’s almost wasn’t about immigration it was about who yall want to hear and who you don’t.
Why do you have to go to such extremely lengths to lie about what you truly want
This guy again. Something is not right with this one..
Posted on 5/13/25 at 10:04 am to stout
I can give her an anchor baby!
Posted on 5/13/25 at 10:58 am to stout
But who will clean our houses and be our nannies???!!!
Posted on 5/13/25 at 11:01 am to StrongSafety
quote:
So it’s almost wasn’t about immigration it was about who yall want to hear and who you don’t.
Why do you have to go to such extremely lengths to lie about what you truly want
We want people who truly want to assimilate and become Americans and follow the legal process in ports of entry.
Where is the lie?
Posted on 5/13/25 at 11:24 am to stout
Posted on 5/14/25 at 12:48 am to Pettifogger
quote:
But yes, of course we want pro-Western Dutch reformed Christian families who value education and work ethic to come here. Why wouldn't we?
That is all canceled out by isolationalist, nativist bigot ideologies that are more destructive and malproductive then any commerce they could bring. What good is money if it’s coming from deplorable horrible people? There’s only so much ignoring of that until it erodes a culture and a society.
They’re welcome but if they bring over their hypocritical form of Christianity and their supremacist feelings, they can stay over there. We have enough of that here for anyone’s own liking
Posted on 5/14/25 at 12:49 am to KCT
Nativism hmmm good yes. Why do you think this will play out well this time around (hint: it never has in human history).
Posted on 5/14/25 at 12:52 am to Bard
The eye for an eye party is now mad that people supposedly are deploying eye for an eye politics are subjects they are fond of?
So it was never about the actual law but more so about those subjected to it? Now why do you actually expect the subjects of this law to actually think that’s okay and to go long with that? Sounds like you want them dumb and not woke to how they’re being treated.
You do know that’s not a sustainable model right
So it was never about the actual law but more so about those subjected to it? Now why do you actually expect the subjects of this law to actually think that’s okay and to go long with that? Sounds like you want them dumb and not woke to how they’re being treated.
You do know that’s not a sustainable model right
Posted on 5/14/25 at 8:27 am to StrongSafety
quote:
Nativism hmmm good yes. Why do you think this will play out well this time around (hint: it never has in human history).
Oh, look. The racist known as Strong Safety has chimed in.
Dude, your black "brothers" have been committing genocide against the white population in South Africa for years now. I guess your sorry, racist arse is okay with that?
Go frick yourself.
This post was edited on 5/14/25 at 8:31 am
Posted on 5/14/25 at 8:29 am to StrongSafety
Prison lingo?
Posted on 5/14/25 at 8:31 am to StrongSafety
quote:Racist
StrongSafety
Posted on 5/14/25 at 8:33 am to StrongSafety
quote:
So it’s almost wasn’t about immigration it was about who yall want to hear and who you don’t. Why do you have to go to such extremely lengths to lie about what you truly want
So it was never about immigration, but anti white racism.
Why do you care so much about 59 white people? We’ve let in millions upon millions of non whites over the years.
The only reason why this is a big deal because you racists made it a big deal.
This post was edited on 5/14/25 at 8:34 am
Posted on 5/14/25 at 8:40 am to KCT
No of course I don’t think it’s wrong.
But the same proponents of “eye for and eye” justice and retribution recourse certainly don’t like it when the tables are turned.
The black South Africans should not be doing what they’re doing, and they should the condemned and swiftly punished accordingly. There’s no denying that or justifying their actions.
What I am saying is that acting like their is a genocide against this farmer group, when the reality is black SAs suffer much more on every other metric/sale, is literally a bold face lie. It’s agenda driven, that is animus laden, to bolster support and justification for a horrible and ancient belief system that the native SAs are inherently inferior.
You’re driving up sympathy for descendants of some of the most vile and heinous and violent colonizers of the past half century. The Dutch colonizers were truly despicable trash and scum. One only has to look at their record and what they did to the natives to see just how awful they were. You’re a strong proponent of eye for eye justice (i am not. I think it’s regressive and doesn’t solve any problems). So why are you so up in arms when the bullied turns to bully?
Their hateful bigotry was passed on to their descendants and honestly, we don’t need their trash in our country if they still harbor those beliefs. They can stay over there and do what they should - continue to work to amend their wrongs and find ways to live in peace and harmony with the natives. I believe it can be done. We’re not defined by our ancestors mistakes.
But the same proponents of “eye for and eye” justice and retribution recourse certainly don’t like it when the tables are turned.
The black South Africans should not be doing what they’re doing, and they should the condemned and swiftly punished accordingly. There’s no denying that or justifying their actions.
What I am saying is that acting like their is a genocide against this farmer group, when the reality is black SAs suffer much more on every other metric/sale, is literally a bold face lie. It’s agenda driven, that is animus laden, to bolster support and justification for a horrible and ancient belief system that the native SAs are inherently inferior.
You’re driving up sympathy for descendants of some of the most vile and heinous and violent colonizers of the past half century. The Dutch colonizers were truly despicable trash and scum. One only has to look at their record and what they did to the natives to see just how awful they were. You’re a strong proponent of eye for eye justice (i am not. I think it’s regressive and doesn’t solve any problems). So why are you so up in arms when the bullied turns to bully?
Their hateful bigotry was passed on to their descendants and honestly, we don’t need their trash in our country if they still harbor those beliefs. They can stay over there and do what they should - continue to work to amend their wrongs and find ways to live in peace and harmony with the natives. I believe it can be done. We’re not defined by our ancestors mistakes.
Posted on 5/14/25 at 8:42 am to StrongSafety
quote:
hypocritical form of Christianity
Proving yourself a bigot while calling other bigots. Beautiful.
Posted on 5/14/25 at 8:43 am to TrueTiger
quote:
Send me a dozen.
Easy baw. I know a farmer who married the sister of one of his South African H2A employees. She is finer than FAF but he says she spends more than both of his 2 ex-wives combined. Better to start off with a half dozen and make sure you can afford them before you get a whole dozen.
Posted on 5/14/25 at 8:44 am to StrongSafety
quote:
So it was never about the actual law but more so about those subjected to it?
Wrong. The South Africans actually are candidates for asylum.
quote:
You do know that’s not a sustainable model right
Coming from an open border wacko….your hypocrisy knows no bounds.
Posted on 5/14/25 at 8:45 am to stout
If she’s looking for work, I think I have an opening available…
Posted on 5/14/25 at 8:45 am to BBONDS25
What form of Christianity believes in supremacy? I didn’t hear that at mass this Sunday.
I know a lot of you get your nationalism blended with your religion but Christ has no nation.
I know a lot of you get your nationalism blended with your religion but Christ has no nation.
Posted on 5/14/25 at 8:47 am to stout
quote:
How quickly will lib white women change on immigration if we bring in more like this?
Depends on if they will keep the kids, cook, maintain the house, and other things that liberal white American women have become too busy or too lazy to do. If they do that and for less than minimum wage just like the illegal women from central and south American that they have been employing for decades then they will not care.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News