- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How many people here are personally pro-choice but oppose RvW based on state’s rights?
Posted on 7/2/18 at 3:23 pm to Volvagia
Posted on 7/2/18 at 3:23 pm to Volvagia
frick the states and all their rights. Abolish all states and live under a single unified rule of law.
Change USA to UMA (Unified Morons of America)
Change USA to UMA (Unified Morons of America)
0
Posted on 7/2/18 at 4:29 pm to Volvagia
I oppose abortion where the life of the mother isn't in question for the same reason I oppose the murder of those outside the womb. I don't think it's a matter that should be left to the states because it is a fundamental human right to be able to live without someone prematurely ending your life.
Posted on 7/3/18 at 10:00 am to RTRinTampa
quote:
They are all things the state should decide.
Our ancestors also believed it was the right of the individual states to decide whether or not human beings could be owned by other human beings.
quote:
You're a disgusting moron
With the above stated, it seems to me that you are the one who is disgusting. Using the 10th Amendment to justify the murder of human beings is just as bad as your great-great-great-great grandfather using the same amendment to justify ownership of another human being.
Posted on 7/3/18 at 10:12 am to FooManChoo
Fair enough that you believe this to be the correct solution to the abortion dilemna. I disagree, but I understand your analysis and respect it.
But where do you see this “right” in the Constitution? In our system of limited fedreL powwers (theoretically), where do you see the States or the People having assigned this determination to the feds?
But where do you see this “right” in the Constitution? In our system of limited fedreL powwers (theoretically), where do you see the States or the People having assigned this determination to the feds?
Posted on 7/3/18 at 10:34 am to AggieHank86
quote:
But where do you see this “right” in the Constitution? In our system of limited fedreL powwers (theoretically), where do you see the States or the People having assigned this determination to the feds?
quote:A state saying it's OK to kill an unborn child is just as wrong as a state saying it's OK to kill a newborn or a toddler. The SCOTUS even said as much regarding abortion but the sticking point was when the unborn child became "viable". I think that aspect of the discussion needs further inspection.
14th Amendment, Section 1
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the law
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News