- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How many of you will be upset if/when Ukraine thwarts Russia?
Posted on 10/3/22 at 8:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 10/3/22 at 8:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
Did you go to Stanford and graduate?
1
Posted on 10/3/22 at 8:22 pm to frequent flyer
quote:
If SFP cared so much about it, why vote for Biden?
I didn't vote for Biden
In fact, I've never voted for a DEM for president after 2004
Posted on 10/3/22 at 11:45 pm to Realityintheface
quote:unlikely
Did you go to Stanford and graduate?
Posted on 10/4/22 at 4:55 am to Powerman
quote:NATO, one of the most significant military alliances in the history of the planet? A "threat"? Naw, why in tarnation would he think that?
Do you believe that Putin really saw them as a threat
This post was edited on 10/4/22 at 4:56 am
Posted on 10/4/22 at 5:00 am to SlowFlowPro
The one thing idiots like this don't realize is we don't care about Russia or the Ukraine.
Posted on 10/4/22 at 5:35 am to Tesla
quote:64mph according to the Pentagon. Of course, considering the thing relies on stealth tech, running at higher speeds is not only unnecessary, it would be counterproductive.
Everything I can find is 32 kts (37mph).
The largest nuke ever tested was the Tzar Bomb at 56 megatons. This thing has a 100 megaton dirty bomb payload. That is unpleasant.
Posted on 10/4/22 at 5:51 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:quote:I haven't done this.
20 more pages of them telling you that you’re lying, you hate America and you want to suck Putin’s dick.
I've shifted almost all of those discussions
quote:Sans the crudity, he's more or less correct. Granted, it's probably not helpful that virtually every pro-ukrainian poster in the thread amplifies that portion of your opinions as well.
I have definitely said there are overt-Russian supporters posting, and lots of people "totally not supporting Putin, but..." posters posting, but what you posted? Not my style.
I've also clearly stated today that this is all mostly just being anti-American because their party isn't in power, just like how DEMs were anti-America under Trump but are pro-America now. It's just polarized/2-sided political identification.
Posted on 10/4/22 at 8:14 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
NATO, one of the most significant military alliances in the history of the planet? A "threat"? Naw, why in tarnation would he think that?
How often has NATO been used in non-defensive maneuver without UN approval? Serious question.
Posted on 10/4/22 at 8:25 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
NATO, one of the most significant military alliances in the history of the planet? A "threat"? Naw, why in tarnation would he think that?
Well Trump told Putin NATO was obsolete. You don’t think Putin believed Trump?
Posted on 10/4/22 at 8:27 am to Cuz413
quote:
We don't have to be involved in every fricking war. Trump proved that with a little common sense peace is achievable. US politicians want this war.
Well Trump was preparing Ukraine for war. Remember, he was giving them tanks and artillery, while Obama was giving them pillows and blankets. Even Trump understood that this conflict was different than any conflict we’ve been in before.
Posted on 10/4/22 at 8:41 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Are y'all happy with having to spend so much of the SPR to keep oil prices at a level that doesn't destroy our economy? The oil costs alone of this war are almost assuredly larger than what we've sent Ukraine. Imagine that in perpetuity.
Are you STILL on the “Putin’s price hike” lie?
You actually swallowed that garbage??
Furthermore.. you actually believe the draw from the SPR is having a major dent in the price of crude?? So much that the US economy would be destroyed without it?
Good gosh. Run soak up some more programming like a good little drone. Have you seen what percentage of global output per day is vs the SPR release??
Posted on 10/4/22 at 8:53 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:About as many times as Japan had attacked the US prior to Dec 7th 1941.
How often has NATO been used in non-defensive maneuver without UN approval? Serious question.
But ... once again ... it is not about the hiker's intent to threaten the snake. It is about the snake's perception of the hiker as a threat.
This post was edited on 10/4/22 at 8:54 am
Posted on 10/4/22 at 8:59 am to CleverUserName
quote:
So much that the US economy would be destroyed without it?
Holy straw man
quote:
you actually believe the draw from the SPR is having a major dent in the price of crude
It is having some effects. Major? Not sure.
Posted on 10/4/22 at 9:01 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
About as many times as Japan had attacked the US prior to Dec 7th 1941.
But the Japanese did attack China and Russia in the early twenty century prior to attacking the US so Japan is not a good analogy.
They had already proven to be warlike and aggressive way before 1941.
Posted on 10/4/22 at 9:02 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
it is not about the hiker's intent to threaten the snake. It is about the snake's perception of the hiker as a threat.
We don't need NATO to attack Russia though. We don't need to control Ukraine, either.
Posted on 10/4/22 at 9:06 am to doubleb
quote:So has NATO. The question SFP posed had to do with UN approval, not "warlike" status.
They had already proven to be warlike and aggressive way before 1941.
Posted on 10/4/22 at 9:08 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:and yet, here we are .... precisely because we wanted to control Ukraine. What a shame.
We don't need to control Ukraine, either.
Posted on 10/4/22 at 9:08 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
So has NATO
What?
Posted on 10/4/22 at 9:08 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
and yet, here we are .
Yeah because the "NATO" excuse was bullshite lol
Posted on 10/4/22 at 9:09 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Sans the crudity, he's more or less correct.
It's not as if there's any reason to make something up; people can read the thread for themselves. It's another poster who's obsessed with Putin's genitalia and keeps referring to it but they're both saying essentially the same thing.
Again, if you ask someone a question only to ignore what they say because you already think you know not only what they believe but why, it's not a discussion. You're not looking for input. It's some wort of weird intellectual (and I use that word loosely) masturbation.
Page 31 of 37
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News