- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How is it possible that some Protestant churches support gay marriage?
Posted on 5/19/25 at 1:34 pm to Furious
Posted on 5/19/25 at 1:34 pm to Furious
quote:I'm glad you truly believe we are saved by grace apart from works. I think you might have a problem with the Council of Trent, though.
This is correct in how to behave as a Catholic Christian, or any Christian for that matter, becasue Jesus commanded them.
However, they will not get you to heaven. Again, only th egrace of God and Christ's mercy will get you to heaven. One can do all the good works they want and still not have faith.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 1:34 pm to Uga Alum
quote:
How is it possible that some Protestant churches support gay marriage?
There are two types of people world and the US. There are progressives and conservatives. Most mainline, formed in the UK denominations are infested with the progressives. They believe all sorts of non biblical BS. I think the Baptists still are and will remain "conservative". But the Presbyterians, Methodists, Episcopal etc. have evolved in that direction.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 1:37 pm to Uga Alum
quote:Yes, we do, and you are the one who doesn't seem to understand the doctrine.
A change of heart leading you to perform good deeds is not having faith alone. Do any of you Protestants actually believe sola fide?
Faith alone is the instrumental cause of salvation. Christ's obedience is the meritorious cause of salvation that Christians receive through faith alone, not by their works.
When a person has a saving belief and faith in Christ's work, Christ's righteousness is credited to the believers account, wiping away the debt of sin and giving an infinite credit of righteousness. Good works of the believer do not add to or subtract from that account. That's what we mean by sola fide.
Good works are an evidence of saving faith, not a cause of it or even a cooperating partner with it to merit Christ's righteousness and forgiveness for our sins.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 1:37 pm to Uga Alum
You might be the right person to ask. What are the oral traditions in the Orthodox Church, and if they don’t conflict with sola scriptura, what do they actually add? I’m curious whether they hold any significant differences or if we essentially believe the same things but are just talking past each other.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 1:39 pm to mudshuvl05
Sounds like you are more concerned about who you than who’s you are.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 1:40 pm to Uga Alum
quote:Yes, if those beliefs are a trusting in Christ, not merely an assent to historical facts. A true saving faith will produce good works because such a faith can only come about by a change of heart and will; they go hand in hand.
So you believe it is impossible to believe that Christ is the son of God, the second person of the trinity, who was incarnated by the Holy Spirit and became man, and who died on the cross for our sins, and arose on the third day, without also displaying good works that serve as evidence of salvation?
A mere intellectual assent is not brought about by a change of heart, and therefore there is no guarantee that good works will follow.
quote:True, which is why I keep saying a mere intellectual assent is not sufficient for salvation and that's not the type of faith that saves. That's precisely what James was saying in chapter 2 when he says that even the demons have that sort of intellectual faith regarding God, but it does them no good, because such assent alone has no transformative power.
Clearly you can believe all of those things mentally and go out and perform bad deeds or even refrain from performing good deeds.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 1:43 pm to FooManChoo
Well said. Everything we are or will be as Christians are because of what Christ did at Calvary.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 1:46 pm to jizzle6609
quote:While I appreciate that sentiment, Rome still has on its books anathemas against Protestant doctrines. Once those are lifted, we can talk about coming together in peace
This is significant on one side and it’s not the Catholics.
The absolute ego you all have thinking Catholic Churches worry about other denominations is mind blowing lol. Literally nothing in any religions outside Catholism have any of yall done anything noteworthy.
I’ve never heard a priest in 39 years ever address a different religion. No offense, we don’t much realize or even think of other religions. Once you go you go. We don’t try to pull you back.

Posted on 5/19/25 at 1:48 pm to FooManChoo
quote:To me, the once saved, always saved doctrine feels like mental gymnastics. Instead of admitting that someone who stops following Christ loses their salvation, it simply claims they were never truly following Christ to begin with, even if it appeared that way. In reality, this doesn’t change anything, we’re just putting a different spin on the same concept.
Think of it how I already explained it: there will be people who do not have saving faith that think that they do because they walked an aisle and said the sinners prayer, or something else that gives them confidence in salvation apart from Christ. If they do fall away, it was because they were never saved to begin with.
To all the non-Protestants out there, think of this like one of those classic denomination disagreements within the Protestant community, subtle, isn’t it?
Posted on 5/19/25 at 1:57 pm to cssamerican
quote:I think it's completely relevant and critical to how we understand salvation, not merely a different spin, though I agree that a misunderstanding in this area is not necessarily a first-tier issue of the faith.
To me, the once saved, always saved doctrine feels like mental gymnastics. Instead of admitting that someone who stops following Christ loses their salvation, it simply claims they were never truly following Christ to begin with, even if it appeared that way. In reality, this doesn’t change anything, we’re just putting a different spin on the same concept.
If salvation is entirely the work of God alone (monergism) rather than the cooperative work of man and God (synergism), then we can have full faith and trust that God will preserve us to the end. If He is the one who elects us, calls us, justifies us, sanctifies us, and glorifies us (Rom. 8:29-30), then we can give God all glory for saving us by His mercy and we can have assurance that He will keep us.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 1:58 pm to Furious
That is hilarious. You use a blanket statement to incorporate all Protestant churches under it. There is so much wrong with this grouping everyone together and saying how “they” don’t do it right, but your group does. Please tell me how “your” group follows all of Jesus’ teachings. How about you as an individual? Are you following all of Christs teachings? I would believe the answer to that would be a no. Even as Christians we far very short of being like Him. But, we still strive everyday to be more like Him. Thank God for His amazing grace that I can go before Him with prayer and supplication making my requests known to God. So that the peace of God will guard my heart and give peace of mind. According to His words, not mine.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 2:07 pm to the808bass
Scared on blacks? I go to a very well known, large PCA church and I can assure you, there are zero fear of blacks. Many pastors & staff are black men & women.
Also, there’s not a hint of gay marriage in the congregation. I would say that if a church does allow or approve of gay marriage and the teaching is demonstrably against it. It would be a minor anomaly, very obscure.
Also, there’s not a hint of gay marriage in the congregation. I would say that if a church does allow or approve of gay marriage and the teaching is demonstrably against it. It would be a minor anomaly, very obscure.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 2:08 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
I think it's completely relevant and critical to how we understand salvation, not merely a different spin, though I agree that a misunderstanding in this area is not necessarily a first-tier issue of the faith.
Definitely not a tier 1 issue, but debating is fun

The “once saved, always saved” doctrine seems problematic when considering the biblical concept of free will. If humans could not choose to walk away from salvation, why could angels, who were created holy and lived in God’s presence, choose to rebel? Scripture shows that angels possessed free will, as seen with the Sons of God in Genesis 6, who left their proper domain and took human wives, resulting in judgment from God: “For if God did not spare angels when they sinned, but cast them into hell…” Despite being in the presence of God, they chose to disobey, demonstrating that even holy beings can fall.
Likewise, Scripture indicates that believers can fall away from faith. Hebrews warns that those who have “once been enlightened” and then “fallen away” cannot be renewed to repentance, demonstrating that even after genuine conversion, a person can choose to turn away. Jesus also emphasizes endurance, stating, “But the one who endures to the end, he will be saved.” This principle aligns with the biblical precedent set by the fallen angels, reinforcing the idea that the gift of free will includes the ability to depart from the faith.
Therefore, just as angels exercised their free will and fell from their position, believers too must consciously remain in the faith. Salvation is not a one-time guarantee but a commitment to follow Christ continually. The warnings throughout Scripture against falling away underscore the importance of perseverance, showing that faith requires ongoing dedication rather than an irreversible state of security.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 2:11 pm to Uga Alum
You’re confusing Protestant with Progressive. They are not the same.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 2:14 pm to RFK
quote:
I don’t adhere to the Old Testament teachings that would condemn her to Hell. There’s a reason there is a New Testament.
There is a reason for the Old Testament as well. Its purpose is exposing how unworthy we are. Without the Old Testament, there is no New Testament.
Jesus tells us to “go and sin no more”
Posted on 5/19/25 at 2:14 pm to The Eric
Are Episcopalians not Protestants?
Posted on 5/19/25 at 2:33 pm to bizeagle
quote:
there are zero fear of blacks
lDid y'all do a black history month celebration?
Posted on 5/19/25 at 2:47 pm to cssamerican
quote:Agreed, and note that we have some fundamental disagreements, but from what I can tell, you are a brother in the faith regardless
Definitely not a tier 1 issue, but debating is fun

quote:I believe the angels are in a state of innocence, as Adam was in the garden before the fall. Adam truly have free will to either do what pleases God through obedience or what displeases God through disobedience. Once Adam sinned, original sin spread to all his posterity. It's why we are told that we are dead in our sins and cannot do what pleases God apart from being born again.
The “once saved, always saved” doctrine seems problematic when considering the biblical concept of free will. If humans could not choose to walk away from salvation, why could angels, who were created holy and lived in God’s presence, choose to rebel? Scripture shows that angels possessed free will, as seen with the Sons of God in Genesis 6, who left their proper domain and took human wives, resulting in judgment from God: “For if God did not spare angels when they sinned, but cast them into hell…” Despite being in the presence of God, they chose to disobey, demonstrating that even holy beings can fall.
I don't believe in the Bible teaches the concept of a libertarian free will in humans after the fall, but that our wills are corrupted and we choose according to the desires of our corrupted wills.
Rom. 8:7–8
"For the mind that is set on the flesh is hostile to God, for it does not submit to God's law; indeed, it cannot. 8 Those who are in the flesh cannot please God."
1 Cor. 2:14
"The natural person does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are folly to him, and he is not able to understand them because they are spiritually discerned."
Eph. 2:1-5
"And you were dead in the trespasses and sins in which you once walked, following the course of this world, following the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that is now at work in the sons of disobedience— among whom we all once lived in the passions of our flesh, carrying out the desires of the body and the mind, and were by nature children of wrath, like the rest of mankind. But God, being rich in mercy, because of the great love with which he loved us, even when we were dead in our trespasses, made us alive together with Christ—by grace you have been saved"
Rom. 9 gets into this in more detail, that is God who saves us according to His love and mercy, not according to what we will do (or even believe).
quote:I don't think you are interpreting that verse correctly according to your view on free will. If we have a liberterian free will, then how can one never be renewed to repentance? If we are free to choose or reject, to believe or not believe, then wouldn't we retain such freedom even if we fell away? Clearly that passage is talking about something else.
Likewise, Scripture indicates that believers can fall away from faith. Hebrews warns that those who have “once been enlightened” and then “fallen away” cannot be renewed to repentance, demonstrating that even after genuine conversion, a person can choose to turn away.
I believe it is talking about those who have been part of the covenant community of God (the visible Church), and partaken in the means of grace and fellowship with the believers; who have professed faith in Christ and partaken in the sacraments, and yet fully and finally reject Christ. In such a case, the unbeliever is outed for who they are and their heart is hardened so much that they will never return. This is not speaking to those who belong to the invisible Church--those who have been elected by God from the foundations of the world--who will be glorified just as surely as they have been justified (Rom. 8:29-30).
quote:Jesus' statement doesn't conflict with what I believe, but reinforces that there are some who grow up in the faith as professors who fall away along side those who persevere to the end. You see this in Jesus' parable of the weeds in Matt. 13, where the weeds and the wheat grow up together (speaking of the elect and reprobate in the visible Church). Sometimes the reprobate stays in the visible church their whole lives and die in unbelief, and sometimes they fall away with persecution or due to temptations to worldliness (parable of the sower), but either way, there will be those who do not belong to Christ that will profess His name without a saving faith. God knows who they are, but we don't, so we are to call all men to repent and continue in the faith for their salvation.
Jesus also emphasizes endurance, stating, “But the one who endures to the end, he will be saved.” This principle aligns with the biblical precedent set by the fallen angels, reinforcing the idea that the gift of free will includes the ability to depart from the faith.
quote:I agree completely that there is a call to perseverance, and that call and warning is a means that God uses to actually keep us from falling if we belong to Him. My point is this: none of the Bible verses you have provided contradict what I believe the Scriptures teach, but actually support the notion that there is the visible church and the invisible church, and not all in the visible church belong to the invisible church, but only those who belong to Christ will be kept to the very end.
Therefore, just as angels exercised their free will and fell from their position, believers too must consciously remain in the faith. Salvation is not a one-time guarantee but a commitment to follow Christ continually. The warnings throughout Scripture against falling away underscore the importance of perseverance, showing that faith requires ongoing dedication rather than an irreversible state of security.
I also have to say this, especially since you're speaking of angels: if all sentient creatures (at least humans and angels) have a liberterian free will necessarily, then what happens when we humans are glorified in Heaven and all sin is removed from us forever? Can we fall away and choose to sin at that point forward? If so, where do you get that from Scripture, and if not, how can that be guaranteed with a libertarian free will? Likewise for those in Hell. You would think that if they retain their libertarian free will in Hell, that the torments of Hell and the knowledge of Christ at that point would compel them to belief and therefore salvation. How do you reconcile those in Heaven and Hell as eternal places where each group stays put for eternity with the concept of necessary libertarian free will?
Posted on 5/19/25 at 3:13 pm to Uga Alum
OSAS is biblical. We can debate whether someone is actually saved or not, but once you are you belong to God. These are just a few I grabbed real quick. Anything that seems to say otherwise has to be misunderstood as these verses are clear and there are many many more. Our problem is we tend to think its up to us. God saved us, but now we have to prove he made the right decision. In actuality he has taken ownership of us and we couldn't walk away if we wanted to.
2 Corinthians 1:20-22
21 Now it is God who makes both us and you stand firm in Christ. He anointed us, 22 set his seal of ownership on us, and put his Spirit in our hearts as a deposit, guaranteeing what is to come.
Ephesians 1:13-14 “And you also were included in Christ when you heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation. Having believed, you were marked in him with a seal, the promised Holy Spirit, who is a deposit guaranteeing our inheritance until the redemption of those who are God’s possession–to the praise of his glory.
John 6:39 “And this is the will of him who sent me, that I shall lose none of all that he has given me, but raise them up at the last day.”
John 10:27-30 “My sheep listen to my voice; I know them, and they follow me. I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish; no one can snatch them out of my hand. My Father, who has given them to me, is greater than all, no one can snatch them out of my Father’s hand. I and the Father are one.”
John 6:38-40 “For I have come down from heaven not to do my will but to do the will of him who sent me. And this is the will of him who sent me, that I shall lose none of all that he has given me, but raise them up at the last day. For my Father’s will is that everyone who looks to the Son and believes in him shall have eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day.”

2 Corinthians 1:20-22
21 Now it is God who makes both us and you stand firm in Christ. He anointed us, 22 set his seal of ownership on us, and put his Spirit in our hearts as a deposit, guaranteeing what is to come.
Ephesians 1:13-14 “And you also were included in Christ when you heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation. Having believed, you were marked in him with a seal, the promised Holy Spirit, who is a deposit guaranteeing our inheritance until the redemption of those who are God’s possession–to the praise of his glory.
John 6:39 “And this is the will of him who sent me, that I shall lose none of all that he has given me, but raise them up at the last day.”
John 10:27-30 “My sheep listen to my voice; I know them, and they follow me. I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish; no one can snatch them out of my hand. My Father, who has given them to me, is greater than all, no one can snatch them out of my Father’s hand. I and the Father are one.”
John 6:38-40 “For I have come down from heaven not to do my will but to do the will of him who sent me. And this is the will of him who sent me, that I shall lose none of all that he has given me, but raise them up at the last day. For my Father’s will is that everyone who looks to the Son and believes in him shall have eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day.”

Posted on 5/19/25 at 3:29 pm to Canon951
We don’t have to prove that God made the right decision. God is perfect. Having to prove him right implies that he can make a mistake.
I do not believe once saved always saved because it implies that we do not have free will and cannot choose to fall out of God’s grace.
I do not believe once saved always saved because it implies that we do not have free will and cannot choose to fall out of God’s grace.
Back to top
