re: How does legacy media get away with Biden cover up?

If you think its one sided your half blind.

Trump legally can't run a charity
....he paid $2m for the right not to.

no talk about it on Fox ever...just that he gives away a paltry salary
Biden cover up or siphoning charity money from cancer kids?

Can a coverup be proven in the court of public opinion? Maybe, depending on what side you’re on. If enough people truly believe that, the culprits will either change their behavior or cease to exist.

Can a coverup be proven in a court of law is another issue - show me admissible evidence that that a private news organization(s) violated some state or federal statute and I’ll definitely consider it. I just don’t think it’s there.

quote:

---

Yes, I found out about them but the people I found them out from have no power to prosecute anyone over it. As long as they end up getting away with it they will continue the same methodology. Conceal, deny, and cover up when the environment around it is white hot and then admit what they did and tell people it is no big deal when the environment cools down.

---

Ok, so now we agree that they have been exposed, principally by the new media. Whether prosecuted or not, they have lost credibility, which has been reflected in the ballot box. Some have even lost their jobs as the legacy media continues to shrink not only in influence, but also in size.

quote:

---

violated some state or federal statute

---

What are the requirements for the maintenance of a broadcast license??
I can stomach private organizations pumping out propaganda even tho it is disgusting and antithetic to any moral concept. But I do not like 'journalists' abusing their access to public airwaves to flood the countryside with deplorably slanted propaganda under the allegation of 'news.'

I have noticed this gradual drift for the past 60 years - with the attacks on RMN after the 'success' of the Watergate burglary was elevated into a world-peace-threatening atrocity. When judged alongside the treasonous acts of the past decade, Watergate was nothing more egregious than a slow night incident on Bourbon St.

How long has it been since the words "extreme left wing" or "far-left" or "said without evidence" or "pounced on," et al, been uttered when attached to any incident that involves any Democrat related act or issue. And how many similar incidents that involve conservative issues have been presented completely objectively? - I used to channel-hop from source to source on any breaking event that had any sort of political issue and found overwhelming "news" reporting that made excuses for any Democrat atrocity, and spewing allegations of 'wrongdoing' for any conservative initiative.

The combined weight of fact and truth and intent all fall heavily on the side that concludes the "NEWs" industry on the public airwaves is horribly one-sided. It is no wonder that two generations of new voters have been overwhelmed with propaganda under the illusion of "news" that would have made Stalin proud.

WHAT can be done about it?

We are in the midst of discovering the greatest treason against the survival and interests of the USA republic that has ever been witnessed - especially from home-grown actors. And we are witnessing the perpetrators attempting to promote the illusion that THEY were the 'injured parties' in the revelation that they had all been pissing on our backs and calling it a bad weather report for decades.

I will not be satisfied until these organizations are fined out of existence and/or reformed under strict guidance, with penalty, of "truth in journalism."

They don't have much to lose since their credibility has already been in decline for decades.

quote:

---

I can stomach private organizations pumping out propaganda even tho it is disgusting and antithetic to any moral concept. But I do not like 'journalists' abusing their access to public airwaves to flood the countryside with deplorably slanted propaganda under the allegation of 'news.'

---

You just described Alex Jones.