- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
How Christianity started vs other religions
Posted on 4/21/19 at 3:30 pm
Posted on 4/21/19 at 3:30 pm
12
Posted on 4/21/19 at 3:32 pm to hawgfaninc
Islam was started by a warlord who harnessed his new religion to wipe out other groups he didn't like.
These are facts.
These are facts.
Posted on 4/21/19 at 3:32 pm to hawgfaninc
Truth. Even the NT epistles speak about the ministry being public and not based on secrets or private knowledge.
Posted on 4/21/19 at 3:33 pm to hawgfaninc
This seems like a long-winded way to say "Pics or it didn't happen".
Posted on 4/21/19 at 3:34 pm to PEPE
The origin of Islam is that of a bastard child who was a result of a mistake by a man that god used to get it right after.
Posted on 4/21/19 at 3:36 pm to Green Chili Tiger
quote:
This seems like a long-winded way to say "Pics or it didn't happen".
Kodak wasn't around back then.
Posted on 4/21/19 at 3:45 pm to hawgfaninc
Looks like and makes about as much sense as a two year old.
Posted on 4/21/19 at 4:01 pm to hawgfaninc
(no message)
Posted on 4/21/19 at 4:02 pm to hawgfaninc
I love your post, but my five tear old could draw better than that.
Posted on 4/21/19 at 4:05 pm to hawgfaninc
Posted on 4/21/19 at 4:09 pm to PEPE
quote:
Islam was started by a warlord who harnessed his new religion to wipe out other groups he didn't like.
Technically, some were given the choice of proclaiming him their leader, actual and spiritual. Otherwise, yeah he had them killed. But like they say “In sha Allah!”
This post was edited on 4/21/19 at 4:11 pm
Posted on 4/21/19 at 4:16 pm to PEPE
quote:also check out what caliph uthman did to the qu'ran. muslims call it the recitation of god but, it's really just the one among many that survived a purge.
Islam was started by a warlord
these are facts
Posted on 4/21/19 at 4:18 pm to PEPE
quote:
Islam was started by a warlord who harnessed his new religion to wipe out other groups he didn't like.
Yeah but Islam and Christianity are equally violent bc the crusades
Posted on 4/21/19 at 4:25 pm to CelticDog
oh my gosh i know you didn't just plug d. m. murdoch/acharya s.
she is the worst. first, she kicked me off her personal message board when i exposed what a fraud she was. she must be REAL confident in her positions. also, her dumb arguments have been sufficiently rebutted by mary jo sharp who has exponentially more credibility.
you should be ashamed.
she is the worst. first, she kicked me off her personal message board when i exposed what a fraud she was. she must be REAL confident in her positions. also, her dumb arguments have been sufficiently rebutted by mary jo sharp who has exponentially more credibility.
you should be ashamed.
Posted on 4/21/19 at 4:26 pm to biglego
quote:sarcasm i hope
Islam and Christianity are equally violent bc the crusades
Posted on 4/21/19 at 4:27 pm to hawgfaninc
Some of the strongest arguments for Christ in my mind revolve around his revelation of his resurrection. If his followers were going to fake it, they would not have based it on the first hand account of women. In the 1st Century women’s testimony wasn’t even admissible in Roman or Jewish court. If you were going to fake it, you would not have him reveal himself to the lowest members of society and then record that in the holy text.
The other proof to me is that all his disciples died horrific deaths for their faith in him. If they heard him speak and believed, and watched him die, but never actually saw him come back like he said, why would they become martyrs for something they knew to be fake? It might make sense for 1 or 2 of them to keep up the story but all of them?
The other proof to me is that all his disciples died horrific deaths for their faith in him. If they heard him speak and believed, and watched him die, but never actually saw him come back like he said, why would they become martyrs for something they knew to be fake? It might make sense for 1 or 2 of them to keep up the story but all of them?
Posted on 4/21/19 at 4:28 pm to RebelExpress38
And those account of the gospel, and Paul’s letters, go back to within living memory of Jesus.
Posted on 4/21/19 at 4:58 pm to RebelExpress38
quote:
Some of the strongest arguments for Christ in my mind revolve around his revelation of his resurrection. If his followers were going to fake it, they would not have based it on the first hand account of women. In the 1st Century women’s testimony wasn’t even admissible in Roman or Jewish court. If you were going to fake it, you would not have him reveal himself to the lowest members of society and then record that in the holy text.
The other proof to me is that all his disciples died horrific deaths for their faith in him. If they heard him speak and believed, and watched him die, but never actually saw him come back like he said, why would they become martyrs for something they knew to be fake? It might make sense for 1 or 2 of them to keep up the story but all of them?
^^^^^^^^
Posted on 4/21/19 at 5:49 pm to hawgfaninc
Your presumption is that the Christian sources of information are accurate and therefore public and the other sources are inaccurate. While I may agree with the conclusions, none of these witnesses are still alive so I think your point could never be proven.
Posted on 4/21/19 at 6:08 pm to ELVIS U
A man named Thomas had similar thoughts.
Page 1 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News