- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
How Arizona voters are set to put Mike Johnson in a corner
Posted on 9/23/25 at 7:12 pm
Posted on 9/23/25 at 7:12 pm
quote:
Speaker Mike Johnson is about to confront one of his biggest leadership tests yet, courtesy of voters in southwest Arizona.
They are highly likely to elect a new Democratic House member in a special election Tuesday. That would-be lawmaker, Adelita Grijalva, told POLITICO she plans to become the 218th and clinching supporter of a bipartisan effort to force public disclosure of federal investigative files related to the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
It’s a controversy that Johnson has been working desperately to snuff out in recent months on behalf of President Donald Trump, who has called the effort a “Democrat hoax.” Now he will have to decide whether to pull rank and settle a fight that has divided his conference or let the matter play out on the House floor.
Grijalva — who is heavily favored to succeed her late father, Raúl Grijalva, in a district Trump lost by 22 points — said she will be pleased to force the issue.
She would be eligible to sign immediately after she is sworn in, likely early next month.
quote:
Grijalva’s signature would complete a process launched by Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) after the Epstein controversy exploded over the summer, cornering Republican leaders between Trump and GOP voters who have insisted on transparency in the government’s handling of the abuser.
The discharge petition allows Massie and Khanna to sidestep Johnson, who has instead supported a House Oversight Committee probe into Epstein. It would force a floor vote requiring publication of all Justice Department records related to the sex offender, with limited exceptions to protect victims.
Johnson has options, however. He can seek to block the discharge effort in the Rules Committee, which he nominally controls, but he has faced a string of mutinies there over Epstein in recent weeks. Or he can let the bipartisan Epstein bill proceed to the floor, where it’s very likely to pass, extending the controversy and handing the hot potato to Senate GOP leaders.
Asked last week about the dilemma, Johnson said he wasn’t ready to make a call.
“We haven’t talked about any of that,” he said in a brief interview before leaving the Capitol Friday, adding that the discharge vote was a “moot point.” He referenced a House vote this month that directed the Oversight panel to continue its probe without explicitly requiring the Justice Department to release the files.
“The Oversight Committee is working overtime on this,” Johnson said. “They’re releasing every single page of documents every time they receive one. I mean, it’s all out in the open. It genuinely is a moot point.”
Behind closed doors, Johnson has told Republicans in recent weeks he wouldn’t force the Rules Committee to short-circuit the discharge petition. Johnson and GOP leaders have also acknowledged in private that a floor vote is likely if the petition gets 218 signatures, as POLITICO reported earlier this month.
House Rules Chair Virginia Foxx (R-N.C.) also said in a brief interview earlier this month that her panel would not intervene in the discharge petition and block a floor vote on Massie-Khanna bill.
LINK
Posted on 9/23/25 at 7:29 pm to ragincajun03
So they, the D's, are forcing the official outing of Clinton, Gates, many Hollywood people and other Pols, Leftist business leaders, media personalities and other connected people in the hope that somehow PDJT is listed?
No leaks as of 2015 connecting PDJT other than some old photos prior to PDJT banning him from Mar a Lago where rich people do hang out with each other?
You D's sure you want this?
No leaks as of 2015 connecting PDJT other than some old photos prior to PDJT banning him from Mar a Lago where rich people do hang out with each other?
You D's sure you want this?
Posted on 9/23/25 at 7:31 pm to ragincajun03
A new ally for Thomas Massie
Posted on 9/23/25 at 7:33 pm to ragincajun03
quote:
They are highly likely to elect a new Democratic House member in a special election Tuesday. That would-be lawmaker, Adelita Grijalva, told POLITICO she plans to become the 218th and clinching supporter of a bipartisan effort to force public disclosure of federal investigative files related to the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
Posted on 9/23/25 at 7:35 pm to Speckhunter2012
Yep, played right into his hand. POTUS Trump wanted the dems to force the disclosure which is exactly what they are doing. We must credit Mike Johnson for his poker face as well.
Posted on 9/23/25 at 7:40 pm to Speckhunter2012
Well now’s the time to release the names and files to the American public. Let’s do it. We should have done it already instead of allowing the Democrats to turn it into a talking point. Unforced error.
Posted on 9/23/25 at 7:42 pm to ragincajun03
Mike Johnson will take the easiest way out. Book it.
Posted on 9/23/25 at 7:43 pm to ragincajun03
Dems working overtime to be transparent after 16 years of having power and zero motivation to be transparent. Thats rich.
Posted on 9/23/25 at 7:46 pm to ragincajun03
The courts have jurisdiction. It’s too bad you can’t understand or believe that.
There is no list. Odds are anything useful was removed from the files years ago…..///and Bill Clinton screwing everything that moved will not satisfy you.
There is no list. Odds are anything useful was removed from the files years ago…..///and Bill Clinton screwing everything that moved will not satisfy you.
Posted on 9/23/25 at 7:49 pm to bluedragon
quote:
There is no list. Odds are anything useful was removed from the files years ago
If that’s the case, then the Administration should just say that. Say that Pam Bondi and her photo op with “social media influencers” was dumb, there’s nothing, and let’s move on.
Posted on 9/23/25 at 8:32 pm to ragincajun03
So, she's inheriting a House seat.
Posted on 9/23/25 at 8:52 pm to FightinTigersDammit
quote:
So, she's inheriting a House seat.
Nothing but the best and the brightest get to go to DC and insider trade!
Posted on 9/26/25 at 10:54 am to ragincajun03
The two courts control the sealed files. The DOJ doesn’t have either one. How can Bondi or Patel say anything?
Can’t release what you cannot see.
Too many leaks from supposed trusted sources.
Can’t release what you cannot see.
Too many leaks from supposed trusted sources.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 10:58 am to sabanisarustedspoke
quote:
Dems working overtime to be transparent after 16 years of having power and zero motivation to be transparent. Thats rich.
Plenty of hypocrisy on both sides regarding The Epstein Files.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 11:00 am to ragincajun03
What exactly is Congress voting on - whether to issue a subpoena, or something else?
Posted on 9/26/25 at 11:03 am to ragincajun03
Dumb as hell. Mike Johnson doesn’t control that, neither does the DOJ
Popular
Back to top
11













