Started By
Message
locked post

How are people opposing the food box proposal?

Posted on 2/14/18 at 1:28 am
Posted by SippingOnPurple
Member since Dec 2017
585 posts
Posted on 2/14/18 at 1:28 am
Why should people choose what handouts they get from the government? Beggars can’t be choosers people.
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
81632 posts
Posted on 2/14/18 at 1:30 am to
Inhumane, unhealthy, cronyism for Packaging and suppliers, cruel, etc.

They hate it so much
Posted by EKG
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2010
44017 posts
Posted on 2/14/18 at 1:32 am to
It’s “restricting the nutritional freedom of the indigent.”




(not my words)
Posted by SippingOnPurple
Member since Dec 2017
585 posts
Posted on 2/14/18 at 1:35 am to
It kills me how welfare recipients think they’re entitled to eat as well (if not better) than the people actually paying for their meal.

I don’t think we should just scrap welfare entirely at this point in time but the system we have now encourages people not to work.
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69289 posts
Posted on 2/14/18 at 1:40 am to
It may be costlier in the long run since private sector logistic chains are more efficient.

Why not just pass a law restricting EBT purchases to non-crappy foods.

No soda ,no cookies, no candy
This post was edited on 2/14/18 at 1:42 am
Posted by EKG
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2010
44017 posts
Posted on 2/14/18 at 1:48 am to
quote:

It may be costlier in the long run since private sector logistic chains are more efficient.

That may end up being the case; a cost analysis will tell the tale.
But this kind of creative thinking (e.g., “America’s Harvest Box”) is one of the reasons Trump was elected.
Business as usual is what’s kept the country from moving forward.
Posted by SippingOnPurple
Member since Dec 2017
585 posts
Posted on 2/14/18 at 1:52 am to
quote:

But this kind of creative thinking (e.g., “America’s Harvest Box”) is one of the reasons Trump was elected.


I prefer to call it “common sense” thinking
Posted by russellvillehog
Member since Apr 2016
9711 posts
Posted on 2/14/18 at 1:56 am to
It just seems more costly, easier to frick up, would probably provide in the end higher costing, lower quality meals.

That's because the government is involved.
Posted by Schmelly
Member since Jan 2014
14469 posts
Posted on 2/14/18 at 1:57 am to
Idk how much an EBT is worth monthly but let’s say it’s $500. Assuming all the kinks can be worked out and costs aren’t more, What’s wrong with giving them $200 worth of staples twice per month and reducing the card to $100? So instead of them being able to buy $500 worth of bullshite, they can only buy $100.

Personally, I don’t give a shite as long as the $500 doesn’t go up. If u wanna spend it on twinkies & coke, knock yourself out. I don’t think this proposal is gonna have any affect on obesity rates like some are suggesting. That’s just silliness

I do wanna figure out how motherfrickers are driving $50k SUVs and have EBT cards though. That shite pisses me off lol
This post was edited on 2/14/18 at 2:00 am
Posted by Canada_Baw
Member since Dec 2017
2044 posts
Posted on 2/14/18 at 2:20 am to
What???
It may be costlier - not a word???
It may cost more money to ship people food then a piece of plastic?
I see limitless potential in this program. Local growers helping people out with local fresh food. USPS not Neumening it ...
Or we can run the alternative - here’s 90$ go buy all the frozen pizza’s, Hungry Mans ya can. Once a month say eff it and do crab legs - rice and beans. Get Fatter and less employable.
Here’s a thought I give you bread, peanut butter, pasta, and a protein. You learn to cook. Hipsters forage the 5th food group.
45$ Less in MS13 hands from perjured cards
Posted by Canada_Baw
Member since Dec 2017
2044 posts
Posted on 2/14/18 at 2:25 am to
Sorry I forgot the part where people had to eat in order to survive. Also I forgot the part where they had to have some descript of function
Posted by DeltaHog
Member since Sep 2009
630 posts
Posted on 2/14/18 at 2:46 am to
quote:

What??? It may be costlier - not a word??? It may cost more money to ship people food then a piece of plastic? I see limitless potential in this program. Local growers helping people out with local fresh food. USPS not Neumening it ... Or we can run the alternative - here’s 90$ go buy all the frozen pizza’s, Hungry Mans ya can. Once a month say eff it and do crab legs - rice and beans. Get Fatter and less employable. Here’s a thought I give you bread, peanut butter, pasta, and a protein. You learn to cook. Hipsters forage the 5th food group. 45$ Less in MS13 hands from perjured cards


I would agree if you only knew where the dollar sign ($) went.
Posted by Lsuchs
Member since Apr 2013
8073 posts
Posted on 2/14/18 at 2:46 am to
quote:

How are people opposing the food box proposal?


For some because they’ll have no choice but to actually get food from the program

This post was edited on 2/14/18 at 2:52 am
Posted by russellvillehog
Member since Apr 2016
9711 posts
Posted on 2/14/18 at 2:47 am to
quote:

500


This is how much basically a mother with 2 kids and no job gets.

A single mother with a job gets like $187
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14179 posts
Posted on 2/14/18 at 2:53 am to
Maybe they are concerned that the contract for supplying the food will go to one of those two-employee LLCs like the ones that got the power line job in Puerto Rico or the FEMA contract that was supposed to deliver 30 million meals and ended up delivering 50,000? ...
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 2/14/18 at 2:55 am to
Honestly. I oppose it

It's simpler and almost certainly cheaper to just restrict purchases
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
23701 posts
Posted on 2/14/18 at 3:16 am to
Because people on food stamps are not beggars and shouldn’t be treated as beggars.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260384 posts
Posted on 2/14/18 at 3:29 am to
quote:

Because people on food stamps are not beggars and shouldn’t be treated as beggars.


Wtf???
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 2/14/18 at 3:44 am to
quote:


Because people on food stamps are not beggars and shouldn’t be treated as beggars


Well. I mean. By definition, they are in fact beggars.

LOL
Posted by Pinecone Repair
Burminham
Member since Nov 2013
7156 posts
Posted on 2/14/18 at 3:51 am to
quote:

Because people on food stamps are not beggars and shouldn’t be treated as beggars.


Wow. How are they not?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram