Started By
Message

re: How accurate are the COVID tests?

Posted on 7/16/20 at 7:18 am to
Posted by bwallcubfan
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2007
38125 posts
Posted on 7/16/20 at 7:18 am to
My work has gone away from the 2 negative tests since testing is being delayed. It would be over 3 weeks if they wanted 2 negatives. So they’re good with just the 1 negative.
Posted by AtlantaLSUfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2009
23108 posts
Posted on 7/16/20 at 7:19 am to
FL labs busted reporting fake positives

Funny how doctors, hospitals, and labs are incentivized to make positives.
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
27161 posts
Posted on 7/16/20 at 7:21 am to
quote:

How accurate are the COVID tests?


Depends on a whole host of things... I am certain some of the tests are accurate... However, I have heard and seen from too many places about high false positives, "clean" test kits testing positive, manipulation of numbers, etc, etc to even remotely believe any numbers that are being put out right now...

I also do not doubt that there are some test kits that have been manipulated (either through process pieces or manufacturing) that have been intentionally rigged to make the numbers explode...
Posted by FATBOY TIGER
Valhalla
Member since Jan 2016
8923 posts
Posted on 7/16/20 at 7:26 am to
I'm 100% positive that a 100% of the people the tested positive are not positive. More so, 100% of the people who tested negative could be 100% positive. On the flip side of that,

I 100% don't give a frick anymore.
Posted by Buckeye Jeaux
Member since May 2018
17756 posts
Posted on 7/16/20 at 7:32 am to
quote:

How accurate are the COVID tests?


How politicized are the COVID tests?
FIFY
Posted by Aubie Spr96
lolwut?
Member since Dec 2009
41152 posts
Posted on 7/16/20 at 7:43 am to
quote:

100% positive



Came to say this. Well done sir.
Posted by keakar
Member since Jan 2017
30059 posts
Posted on 7/16/20 at 7:48 am to
90% of positive tests are false positives

dimrats dont care, need need way more testing to steal the election with the largest massive voter fraud scheme ever to be attempted with mail in and voting by text
Posted by Perrydawg
Middle Ga Area
Member since Jan 2014
4770 posts
Posted on 7/16/20 at 7:49 am to
Probably about as accurate as political polls
Posted by oogabooga68
Member since Nov 2018
27194 posts
Posted on 7/16/20 at 7:51 am to
I made a post that asked "How many times can someone lie to you before you stop trusting them"....
Posted by pcolatiger28
Pensacola, Fl
Member since Apr 2009
1284 posts
Posted on 7/16/20 at 7:51 am to
100% positive 100% of the time
Posted by Tridentds
Sugar Land
Member since Aug 2011
20411 posts
Posted on 7/16/20 at 7:54 am to
Officials locally are saying 80%. No idea how they can arrive at a % unless they are testing a patient that is confirmed with COVID 40-50 times to compare results. That would be a starting point but this needs to be repeated on dozens or more COVID positive people.

80% sounds like a horseshite Guess
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
32263 posts
Posted on 7/16/20 at 8:25 am to
I would say that they are pretty dang accurate. I think the problem is how many times are they counted. For instance, if you test positive and then retest positive, that should be reported as one positive but is likely recorded as two. Inflate numbers pretty quickly that way.
Posted by mooseofterror
USA
Member since Dec 2012
1338 posts
Posted on 7/16/20 at 9:14 am to
quote:

Not much of an issue with the PCRs.


Just curious, have you ever designed, tested and validated a qPCR assay?

The PCR will pick up other strains of corona virus, so there is an issue with false positives. The very first qPCR test used by the CDC was laughable and showed such incompetence that we should not trust ANYTHING from the CDC.
Posted by nerd guy
Grapevine
Member since Dec 2008
12718 posts
Posted on 7/16/20 at 9:37 am to
quote:

• Abbott's test is popular because it returns results in 15 minutes, but it has a nearly 15% FNR.



Are you talking about our ID Now test? We make more than one PCR assay.


Posted by ChEgrad
Member since Nov 2012
3267 posts
Posted on 7/16/20 at 9:40 am to
quote:

quote: What about false positive results?

Not much of an issue with the PCRs.


I read that the PCR will pick up the pieces of virus already destroyed - i.e., what has already been destroyed in a person who has recovered. This is what confused doctors and researchers when recovered patients kept testing positive. Is that not a type of false positive, being that there is not actually any whole, live virus remaining, but a person tests positive for Covid-19?
Posted by mooseofterror
USA
Member since Dec 2012
1338 posts
Posted on 7/16/20 at 9:57 am to
quote:

Are you talking about our ID Now test? We make more than one PCR assay


The only assay in that list that is qPCR based is under the Viral RNA column. Also, it is called Quantitative PCR or REal-Time PCR, which takes measurements at the end of each PCR cycle. "PCR" is an endpoint measurement and is not the sample as qPCR.
Posted by BlackHelicopterPilot
Top secret lab
Member since Feb 2004
52833 posts
Posted on 7/16/20 at 10:01 am to
quote:

What about false positive results?
Not much of an issue with the PCRs.


Wait...what does this mean? Is it "not much of issue" - meaning it does not happen. Or, "not much of an issue"- meaning only false Negatives are important.


If the latter....a test that ALWAYS (100% of the time) says "positive" would meet that goal and be bullshite at the same time. No?
This post was edited on 7/16/20 at 10:02 am
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
18011 posts
Posted on 7/16/20 at 10:13 am to
quote:

What about false positive results? Or is a false negative the same thing?


These tests were purposely created to have a plethora of false positives.
Posted by nerd guy
Grapevine
Member since Dec 2008
12718 posts
Posted on 7/16/20 at 11:11 am to
quote:

The only assay in that list that is qPCR based is under the Viral RNA column. Also, it is called Quantitative PCR or REal-Time PCR, which takes measurements at the end of each PCR cycle. "PCR" is an endpoint measurement and is not the sample as qPCR.



I know enough about PCR, my friend.

Saying assays run on our m2000 and Alinity m have a 15% false negative rate would be incorrect. m2000 and Alinity m are nothing like the ID Now.
Posted by Paluka
One State Over
Member since Dec 2010
10763 posts
Posted on 7/16/20 at 11:16 am to
I did not think there was just one set of tests. My understanding is that Tulane medical center developed and uses their own tests.

first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram