Started By
Message

re: House Dems stormed Speaker Johnson’s office demanding Adelita Grijalva be sworn in

Posted on 10/16/25 at 7:53 am to
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
140573 posts
Posted on 10/16/25 at 7:53 am to
quote:

I get that, but it's also a tool for further pressuring Dems to cave on the shut-down.


That doesn't make sense in the House. The House passed a CR. The government is shut down due to Chuck Schumer and his Democrat coalition in the Senate.
Posted by theronswanson
House built with my hands
Member since Feb 2012
3257 posts
Posted on 10/16/25 at 7:59 am to
quote:

That doesn't make sense in the House


It’s because the sole reason is to stop the Epstein files from being released. Even H1B hire Patel was very dodgy and evasive during his congressional testimony as to the Epstein files.

Who are they trying to protect?!?
Posted by IMSA_Fan
Member since Jul 2024
838 posts
Posted on 10/16/25 at 8:03 am to
Yeah this is all tied to the congress if attempting to keep the Epstein files under lock and key
Posted by riverdiver
Summerville SC
Member since May 2022
2996 posts
Posted on 10/16/25 at 8:03 am to
quote:

also, when John Fetterman appears to be the most reasonable member of your party, might be time to clean house by force.


It’s sad when a guy with documented brain damage is the most reasonable member.
Posted by DawgCountry
Great State of GA
Member since Sep 2012
33382 posts
Posted on 10/16/25 at 8:08 am to
quote:

Tmcgin


Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
140573 posts
Posted on 10/16/25 at 8:09 am to
quote:

It’s because the sole reason is to stop the Epstein files from being released.


IDK what they are worried about. Even if they vote to release the Epstein files the CIA will just tell them, "no and frick you". And a few House members will cry on X and Mike Johnson will say "okay, we tired".
Posted by Chingon Ag
Member since Nov 2018
4131 posts
Posted on 10/16/25 at 8:15 am to
Should have had a number of undercover feds in that group that led them around the capitol on a guided tour and then thrown them in jail for a few years without visitation right.
Posted by 21blackjack
Member since Oct 2025
1099 posts
Posted on 10/16/25 at 8:16 am to
This reeks of DEM desperation
Posted by AubieinNC2009
Mountain NC
Member since Dec 2018
7328 posts
Posted on 10/16/25 at 8:31 am to
quote:


Johnson isn’t swearing her in because she would be the last signature needed for the discharge petition to release the Epstein files.


If there was actually anything in the Epstein files why didn't the dems release when Biden was POTUS? Or just do what they normally do and release it illegally and don't care?

Why? Because there is nothing there.
Posted by oldskule
Down South
Member since Mar 2016
25322 posts
Posted on 10/16/25 at 8:32 am to
Anger is the DEM trademark
Posted by I20goon
about 7mi down a dirt road
Member since Aug 2013
19829 posts
Posted on 10/16/25 at 8:45 am to
quote:


Johnson isn’t swearing her in because she would be the last signature needed for the discharge petition to release the Epstein files. Again, we must ask ourselves why Johnson is protecting pedophiles who trafficked young women. It truly doesn’t make any sense.

don't let fools like this confuse you.

She won a special election (in Sept. 2025, not the Nov 2024 election cycle) and the vote was certified (by AZ) after the House was in break.

She COULD be sworn in at a pro-forma session without friends and family, etc. at the ceremony. But since the day she won (before certification) they have made drama about this linking it to the Epstein files (Biden hid Trump's involvement right?) so Johnson basically has taken the position of if you want drama, I'll give you drama and had delayed he swearing in until, as is tradition, the House is in session.
This post was edited on 10/16/25 at 8:47 am
Posted by Giantkiller
the internet.
Member since Sep 2007
25485 posts
Posted on 10/16/25 at 8:47 am to
quote:

House Dems stormed Speaker Johnson’s office demanding Adelita Grijalva be sworn in



If they'd done this on a whim, I'd give them more credit. But there's TV cameras present. All just fake, grandstanding bullshite.

This is all the cards the Dems have. How sad.
Posted by Hog on the Hill
AR
Member since Jun 2009
13493 posts
Posted on 10/16/25 at 8:53 am to
quote:

If they'd done this on a whim, I'd give them more credit. But there's TV cameras present. All just fake, grandstanding bullshite.

This is all the cards the Dems have. How sad.
This is how (nearly) all politicians operate. It's all theater
This post was edited on 10/16/25 at 8:55 am
Posted by Hog on the Hill
AR
Member since Jun 2009
13493 posts
Posted on 10/16/25 at 8:57 am to
quote:

She COULD be sworn in at a pro-forma session without friends and family, etc. at the ceremony. But since the day she won (before certification) they have made drama about this linking it to the Epstein files (Biden hid Trump's involvement right?) so Johnson basically has taken the position of if you want drama, I'll give you drama and had delayed he swearing in until, as is tradition, the House is in session.
Yes it's pretty much just a power play. He previously swore in two republicans in pro forma sessions. He's refusing to do it now because of partisanship. Example number 19,317 of how politics in our country is broken and farcical. Please note that I'm not pretending that the blame is only on one side. The whole thing sucks.
This post was edited on 10/16/25 at 8:58 am
Posted by CamdenTiger
Member since Aug 2009
65810 posts
Posted on 10/16/25 at 9:07 am to
Wasn’t there a Democratic Whistleblower that said Nancy planned Jan 6 for over a year?
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
89087 posts
Posted on 10/16/25 at 9:08 am to
quote:

Go away clown


Oh he did.

Tmcgin is a hit-and-run guy. Too much of a pussy to come back and defend his ridiculous statements.

It’s like R Lee Ermey said: he’s the kind of guy who’d frick another guy in the arse without giving him the courtesy of a gotdamned reacharound.
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
42468 posts
Posted on 10/16/25 at 9:57 am to
quote:

What’s the story behind this? Why is it taking so long to swear her in?


Don’t know. Looks like a couple posters have it figured out.

I can see Johnson just fricking with them.
Posted by TenWheelsForJesus
Member since Jan 2018
11397 posts
Posted on 10/16/25 at 10:01 am to
quote:

Johnson isn’t swearing her in because she would be the last signature needed for the discharge petition to release the Epstein files


How many things now is this administration and congress doing or not doing because of Epstein?

Everything is just a distraction from Epstein to some people. Trump attacked Iran to stop people talking about it, and now Johnson is not swearing in a democrat.

Next thing I know, I'm going to be told that Trump changed daylight savings to distract from Epstein.
Posted by newmexicotiger
Member since Sep 2017
4420 posts
Posted on 10/16/25 at 10:04 am to
Where is Michael Byrd when you need him? She looked more violent than Ashli Babbitt.

Posted by bignuss18
Member since Sep 2025
806 posts
Posted on 10/16/25 at 11:00 am to
That’s my favorite to bring up at Christmas. The most reasonable guy literally went to therapy and came out on the other end, apparently less liberal. There’s no response to it and the subject quickly changes back to how stupid, old and fat Trump is
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram