re: Honest question: what is the explanation of the ballistics with Charlie?

quote:

---

You can get a lot of different bullet weights (grains) of 30-06 round. All the way down to like 110 grain up to over 200 grain

---

Hornady makes a low recoil round in 30-06 with a 125 grain bullet. At 200 yards it's moving at about 2100 fps and has about 1200 foot pounds of energy.

That would be plenty deadly and not necessarily pass through.

Too many posts to read through them all.
You Tube video with a guy discussing plate armor of the chest. Excellent video.
Cliffs, bullet hits top of contoured plate armor, deformed bullet ricochets upward into neck creating larger than expected entry wound, no exit because it goes into head/brain and stopped by skill.
The entry into brain also explains this post-shot posture.
Side note. This type of body armor, while small enough to fit under a t shirt, is designed to be worn over a Kevlar liner to prevent shrapnel penetration like seen here

“He was dead nearly immediately, the internal trauma was catastrophic,”

This…

quote:

---

Pistol has to be a 10mm. I love mine.

I can carry it for bear protection or human protection.

---

Yeah I love my Glock 20. It’s my home defense pistol.

quote:

---

seems the most reasonable explanation

---

The most reasonable explanation is the official story. He was not wearing armor. Shot came from Charlie's left, slightly elevated. Bullet entered his neck, destroyed basically everything, went through his spine, and stopped under the skin.

He wasn't shot with artillery. He was shot with a .30-06 at close range with an unknown projectile that stopped under the skin. It isn't far fetched at all, and all of the evidence and footage tracks perfectly. The entrance wound only looked so massive because of the tremendous blood flow from it.

Qualifications: I have shot A LOT of things with centerfire rifles. Anything other than the above explanation is overcomplicating a simple matter and talking just to attempt to generate clicks.

He doesn’t want to get de-monetized by some content/streaming platform. That actually doesn’t explain at all why he didn’t just say “commit suicide” on this platform but that is the reason you hear it more often.

quote:

---

Really? Did you bother analyzing anything about the event or go straight to accepting the entire narrative?

---

there is zero evidence that anyone other than Robinson was involved at this time.

But it will not stop the drama queens from creating drama.

Why are yall making me agree with RogerTheShrubber?

Believe what you must but this event was a total charade, sham, then a mockery of normal process AND routine forensic investigation. Slop and bad vaudeville.

It's shocking to see so many take your position of no-questions-asked.

We'll just have to move on and accept the "official" story despite the assertion of one wise poster, "It's all fake."

quote:

---

Believe what you must but this event was a total charade

---

Only because you want it to be.