- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Hillary Clinton refuses to be served Tulsi Gabbard’s defamation lawsuit
Posted on 1/30/20 at 6:54 am to captainFid
Posted on 1/30/20 at 6:54 am to captainFid
0
Posted on 1/30/20 at 6:56 am to roadGator
She truly is above the law. The fact that she keeps showing up in the media despite her obvious corruption speaks to the level of immunity she must feel..
Posted on 1/30/20 at 6:58 am to captainFid
She can run, but cannot win!
She can hide, but cannot be unseen!
She is the deplorable of which she warned.
She is the bimbo who Bill scorned.
I wish she was gone away.
Incognito she should stay.
She can hide, but cannot be unseen!
She is the deplorable of which she warned.
She is the bimbo who Bill scorned.
I wish she was gone away.
Incognito she should stay.
Posted on 1/30/20 at 7:09 am to captainFid
Process server needs to say they need Hillary to sign for a pants suit instead of a law suit. Boom she’s served.
Posted on 1/30/20 at 7:09 am to udtiger
quote:
When the judge is made aware if her ducking service, it won't turn out well for her.
Bruh she’s Hillary what’s the judge gonna do
Posted on 1/30/20 at 7:11 am to captainFid
Someone’s a “deplorable” and it isn’t the average American.
Posted on 1/30/20 at 7:53 am to kmdawg17
quote:Uhhhh no.
The server could effectively nail it to the door of her residence and say she is served, then the clock starts ticking
Posted on 1/30/20 at 7:55 am to Tiger4Ever
quote:
You mean it won’t turn out well for the judge....
What was his name?
Posted on 1/30/20 at 8:07 am to roadGator
quote:
Because you are a pussy?
STFU progtard. You realize free will exists for you to skip threads that talk about your Queen Clinton. By the way, it’s still not her turn, punk.
Ok snowflake. Did I hit a nerve?
Posted on 1/30/20 at 8:08 am to captainFid
quote:
process server
Why not U.S. Marshal?
Posted on 1/30/20 at 8:09 am to captainFid
Personally, I think Tulsi’s lawsuit is great, but we are getting lots of opinions about service of citation from people who know nothing about service of citation.
I agree that HRC’s actions are “not a good look” from a PR perspective, but she has done nothing wrong with regard to this issue.
First, her lawyer is not required to accept service n her behalf. That is basically the first day of your FRCP class in the first semester of law school.
Second, SecretService is not going to get into any trouble. They are not requiredto accept service, either. 99% of service is handled by private process servers, as opposed by an officer of the court. FRCP 4(c). Assuming that Tulsi used a private process server, Secret Service is not going to allow access to some rando without a badge. They MIGHT not even allow access to a random US Marshal.
The judge is not going to be annoyed. Upon request by Tulsi, he will sign a standard order for substituted service, probably for service upon any person over the age of 18 found at her residential address.
I agree that HRC’s actions are “not a good look” from a PR perspective, but she has done nothing wrong with regard to this issue.
First, her lawyer is not required to accept service n her behalf. That is basically the first day of your FRCP class in the first semester of law school.
Second, SecretService is not going to get into any trouble. They are not requiredto accept service, either. 99% of service is handled by private process servers, as opposed by an officer of the court. FRCP 4(c). Assuming that Tulsi used a private process server, Secret Service is not going to allow access to some rando without a badge. They MIGHT not even allow access to a random US Marshal.
The judge is not going to be annoyed. Upon request by Tulsi, he will sign a standard order for substituted service, probably for service upon any person over the age of 18 found at her residential address.
This post was edited on 1/30/20 at 8:31 am
Posted on 1/30/20 at 8:09 am to Wtodd
quote:no
Can't the SS be cited for this?
Posted on 1/30/20 at 8:09 am to captainFid
quote:
but was turned away by Secret Service agents
This only proves my argument there is a two tiered justice system in this country. One for you and me, and another for the so-called elites. I'll say this, Tulsi Gabbard better upgrade the security system on her home and stay away from dark places at night.
His name was Seth Rich.
Posted on 1/30/20 at 8:10 am to AggieHank86
liberal Hank defending Hillary Posted on 1/30/20 at 8:10 am to shrevetigertom
quote:
Uhhhh no.
Maybe things have changed or it's different in a federal lawsuit, but I've been to court and through the process at the civil level and the individual refused to acknowledged the lawsuit until i had them served, which was a sheriff attaching the paperwork to their door...
Posted on 1/30/20 at 8:12 am to theronswanson
A nerve. Not exactly. I find you prog males pathetic so I mean that’s kind of annoying so....
But don’t put your pussy hat on over it.
But don’t put your pussy hat on over it.
Posted on 1/30/20 at 8:12 am to kmdawg17
quote:No. That is one method of substituted service, but it must be specifically-approved by a court order beforehand.
It doesn't matter if one "refuses" when being served. The server could effectively nail it to the door of her residence and say she is served, then the clock starts ticking
Posted on 1/30/20 at 8:13 am to AggieHank86
quote:
she has done nothing wrong
Posted on 1/30/20 at 8:14 am to Putty
quote:FRCP 4.
Why not U.S. Marshal?
Marshals do not waste their time serving Citation, unless specifically-ordered by the judge.
Posted on 1/30/20 at 8:14 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Can't the SS be cited for this?
quote:
no
Why not (serious question)? They're interfering with the legal process and the server isn't posing a threat.
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News