Started By
Message

re: Here’s an interesting statistic…

Posted on 5/26/22 at 2:21 pm to
Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
64329 posts
Posted on 5/26/22 at 2:21 pm to
Even if you gave that money to public schools it would go into the pockets of the teachers unions and "equity" programs.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
39736 posts
Posted on 5/26/22 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

We are talking about putting resource officers
Really? How many are we talking about nationwide to fulfill your plan? You do understand police, teachers, bus drivers, etc. are ALL in short supply right now, right? We are just magically going to onboard 100K new government employees - for positions that are actually important and require someone of actual competence?

And thanks for the sweet link to the advocacy group for SROs.

I still haven't heard you quote any cost/benefit numbers.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
47485 posts
Posted on 5/26/22 at 2:23 pm to
quote:

Because it hasn’t been shown to deter shooters.


No way to measure that, but there are many, well documented cases of resource officers stopping or foiling shooters.

quote:

Some reports indicate there was armed security at the Uvalde school.

I read this as well. Clearly that officer went to the Scott Israel school of law enforcement.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
39736 posts
Posted on 5/26/22 at 2:26 pm to
quote:

guess what? we could have taken that 40B and funded a resource officer in every public school in America for a decade.
Sure. More government employees! What other government employees could we have spent the $40B on? Why stop at just SROs? My local park has the "potential for crime" - why not a PRO at every park?

I am EXPLICITLY arguing that there is no actual problem of mass shootings in schools. They are extremely rare. It's almost certainly vastly more dangerous to drive to school than to be at school. Perhaps a government Car Resource Officer for every commuting vehicle?

Surely you were on the side of understanding we massively over-reacted to the risks of Covid - risks that were WAY higher than the risks of school shooting. Why are you over-reacting to shootings - and so eager to "solve" the problem with more government employees? Seems out of character for you.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
47485 posts
Posted on 5/26/22 at 2:32 pm to
you still sound like a fricking idiot.

There are roughly 100K public schools in the US and about 50K SRO's already employed. The average salary for an officer is under 50K and many of these officers work off-duty details, are retired military or LEO. Maybe we can use some of the cops you assholes got fired after the defund movement to fill the rest, but its doable. Very doable. shite, we created a 60K army of TSA agents in just a few years.

Bottom line: This is peanuts. The federal governemnt is currently spending 3MM of your money every day to NOT build the border wall.

Its not hard. You just dont want to stop schools shootings.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
47485 posts
Posted on 5/26/22 at 2:34 pm to
quote:

I am EXPLICITLY arguing that there is no actual problem of mass shootings in schools.


Go tell that to EVERY SINGLE ELECTED DEMOCRAT in this country, or else stfu about it.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
89432 posts
Posted on 5/26/22 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

Armed guards for every school is a terrible idea.


But every other government building is cool? We legit protect so many things with guns, but when it comes to schools and children you draw the line?

This post was edited on 5/26/22 at 2:49 pm
Posted by ThuperThumpin
Member since Dec 2013
9309 posts
Posted on 5/26/22 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

No way to measure that, but there are many, well documented cases of resource officers stopping or foiling shooters.



LINK

quote:

FWIW from JAMA

This study examined a total of 133 cases of school shootings and attempted school shootings from 1980 to 2019. Perpetrators’ ages ranged from 10 to 53; however, only 16 shooters (11%) were aged 22 years or older. Ninety-four perpetrators (70%) were current students, and 21 perpetrators (15%) were former students. Of all perpetrators, 83 (76%) were White and 148 (98%) were male. Of 121 cases with full information, 57 (47.11%) were targeted shootings. There were 134 shootings, 12 with more than one shooter. A mean (SD) of 1.34 (3.25) people per case were killed and 3.15 (5.06) per case were injured, with a mean (SD) of 1.63 (1.22) weapons per shooting (primarily handguns; 68.66% [92 of 134]). An armed guard was on scene in 23.58% of shootings (29 of 123) (Table 1).

Based on theory, multivariate models include the presence of an armed guard and control for region, school type (public, nonpublic), and grade level (high school, elementary, other); location (urban, suburban, rural); use of lockdown drills; if the attack was targeted; total number of weapons brought to the scene; number of shooters; and weapon type. Results are presented as incident rate ratios in Table 2 and show armed guards were not associated with significant reduction in rates of injuries; in fact, controlling for the aforementioned factors of location and school characteristics, the rate of deaths was 2.83 times greater in schools with an armed guard present


This is just one study but others have concluded with similar results. I'm still not necessarily opposed to the idea of having armed security but the role and training of these individuals should be to eliminate armed threats. Thats it. Not rent a cops, or resource officers or retired guys looking for a little extra cash.
This post was edited on 5/26/22 at 2:57 pm
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
55100 posts
Posted on 5/26/22 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

Why?

Because you’re just going to get your armed guards killed. An armed guard is going to be alert his first couple of days on the job. After that he’s going to be bored as shite, and he’s going to relax. He’ll have his feet up on the desk, looking at porn on his phone, when suddenly, someone will burst into the office and shoot him first…and then kill everyone else.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
47485 posts
Posted on 5/26/22 at 3:27 pm to
This has been politicized. The left is anti-SRO, so its not surprising to see "research" to back that agenda up.

From the DOJ using FBI data...

quote:

The commission’s conclusions are supported by research conducted by the U.S. Secret Service that
examined 41 attacks carried out in K–12 schools in the United States from 2008 to 2017. In 66 percent
of the cases, a security officer or SRO was assigned to the school on a full- or part-time basis. During
49 percent of the attacks the officer was on duty at the school. In almost 30 percent of the cases, the
officer or SRO made it to the scene of the attack within one minute. In contrast, there was only one
incident in which outside law enforcement was able to make it to the scene in less than one minute,
and in that case the officer was already on school grounds for other reasons. (National Threat
Assessment Center 2019)

quote:

As of May 2020, there are 236 cases in the ASV database including both averted (168) and completed
(68) attacks. Of the total cases, 185 occurred at K–12 schools. Thirty-four of those cases involve SROs.
In a number of these cases, the SRO was an intended target. They go on to profile 12 of those cases where an intervening SRO helped to avert a larger death toll


LINK

Perhaps not a deterrent - there's not much that can deter a psychopath - but certainly SRO's save lives. There are several cases outlined in this report, as well as the ones I cited earlier with a lazy, one page Google search.

Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
39736 posts
Posted on 5/26/22 at 4:21 pm to
quote:

Maybe we can use some of the cops you assholes got fired after the defund movement
I have been very vocal about the fact that the problem in high crime areas in the US is UNDER policing - just look at Europe, which has a markedly higher per capita police presence than the US. So don't lump me in with that defund nonsense. However, it is true that it's VERY hard to find qualified police of any kind right now. There are shortages all over the place.

quote:

shite, we created a 60K army of TSA agents in just a few years.
And how did THAT turn out? You are advocating for some things based on other things that are a disaster.

quote:

Its not hard.
Nah. It's hard.

quote:

You just dont want to stop schools shootings.
I would love to live in a rainbow and unicorn world where no risks exist at all. You continue to refuse to address actual risk numbers. The roads to school represent a veritable holocaust of children compared to what shootings cause - and yet I think it's highly unlikely you are advocating a massive new government hiring program to make sure those deaths are minimized. In other words - everything is a trade-off. You know that...it's just that on school shootings, you want the trade off to be zero vs infinite resources.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
39736 posts
Posted on 5/26/22 at 4:26 pm to
quote:

Go tell that to EVERY SINGLE ELECTED DEMOCRAT in this country, or else stfu about it.
I'm not sure what status you think I have, but I certainly point it out ad nauseum any time it comes up. I also don't see how it lets you off the hook of simple logic just because dems are turds. You seem like you are trying to become one with your kneejerk reaction to all this.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
39736 posts
Posted on 5/26/22 at 4:27 pm to
quote:


But every other government building is cool? We legit protect so many things with guns, but when it comes to schools and children you draw the line?
I just know that schools are the safest places in public life - and they are VERY safe. I'm certainly open to the idea of eliminating costly and ineffective government employees at lots of government buildings. And I am certainly willing to disband the TSA.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
39736 posts
Posted on 5/26/22 at 4:28 pm to
quote:

This is just one study but others have concluded with similar results. I'm still not necessarily opposed to the idea of having armed security but the role and training of these individuals should be to eliminate armed threats. Thats it. Not rent a cops, or resource officers or retired guys looking for a little extra cash.
Nah. Vacherie says we can just snap our fingers and hire 50K of these wizards!
Posted by Crimson1st
Birmingham, AL
Member since Nov 2010
21094 posts
Posted on 5/26/22 at 4:31 pm to
quote:

$409,970.48 per school.

Sounds like a decent salary for 2-3 armed guards for each school in the US.



Sure does sound like enough BUT the politicians lose the thrill of giving Zelensky a virtue signal BJ!
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
140573 posts
Posted on 5/26/22 at 4:32 pm to
I upvoted because I 100% approve of the message the OP is sending.
Posted by ThuperThumpin
Member since Dec 2013
9309 posts
Posted on 5/26/22 at 4:46 pm to
quote:

Nah. Vacherie says we can just snap our fingers and hire 50K of these wizards


Are there any measures you would support that would attempt to deter incidents or reduce casualties?
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
47485 posts
Posted on 5/26/22 at 4:59 pm to
quote:

Nah. Vacherie says we can just snap our fingers and hire 50K of these wizards!


You fricking idiot. You think its difficult for local school boards and jurisdictions to find one individual per school to serve as a SRO? Half the job is already done, and more are coming every year. Its already happening without support from the federal government,

But I bet you think people like John Kerry can change the temperature of the planet, ban air travel and 99% of cars, gut and rebuild every structure in America, take in all of the worlds poor and downtrodden, make men give birth, pay every American UBI and free healthcare, and get all of our energy from cow farts and solar panels before the earth melts in 10 years?

You are a clown.

You dont want the mass shooting to stop until you get your beloved gun grab. No one is fooled.
This post was edited on 5/26/22 at 5:07 pm
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
47485 posts
Posted on 5/26/22 at 5:00 pm to
quote:

Are there any measures you would support that would attempt to deter incidents or reduce casualties?


Only a gun grab. Thats why he doesnt want the killing to stop.
Posted by ThuperThumpin
Member since Dec 2013
9309 posts
Posted on 5/26/22 at 5:00 pm to
quote:

but certainly SRO's save lives


That why I thinkI would be on board with it.

quote:

there's not much that can deter a psychopath -


Yes and thats why we would have to manage expectations. These shocking events will still occur .
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram