Started By
Message

re: Here's a question for the pro-lock down crowd

Posted on 3/20/20 at 8:13 pm to
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 8:13 pm to
quote:

Most people just don’t have the stomach to do nothing in the event of a catastrophe
I would point out that it really isn't a matter of "total lockdown vs do nothing" although if you oppose lock down, the assholes equate that to "doing nothing".

quote:

t’s why we treat cancer patients with a 3% survival rate
Yeah

But I don't go bankrupt 5 strangers down the road to get treatment for cancer.

Posted by Dawgfanman
Member since Jun 2015
25896 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 8:14 pm to
quote:

Would you bankrupt your entire family for life for any of those given time frames in order to guarantee they wouldn't catch the coronavirus?


Only to save their life, Corona Virus is less a threat to their lives than a car wreck. I’m mid 40s, teen kids. I don’t know what to do other than follow the law, because not doing so will guarantee an equally bad result. This seems a heavy price to pay (20% or greater unemployment, everyone’s life savings chopped in half, home values gonna plummet, etc) for something that may not even help. But I’m gonna lock down, pray, polish my rifle and eat all this damn food. I think my job is fairly safe, wifes probably isn’t but thankfully we built our life on my salary and save almost all hers.
Posted by BobBoucher
Member since Jan 2008
18503 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 8:14 pm to
quote:

I’m in the camp that believes it’s been here for months and I personally believe I’ve already contracted it and recovered


Not likely unless your ERs have been unusually busy and they just didn’t notice.

This virus sends a solid percentage to the hospital.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466834 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 8:16 pm to
quote:

We’re far past that point though, aren’t we?


we were past that part before February and just didn't know it b/c China lied
Posted by Jyrdis
TD Premium Member Level III
Member since Aug 2015
13429 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 8:16 pm to
You’re ok with bankrupting yourself for 100 years?
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
59226 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 8:16 pm to
quote:


Not likely unless your ERs have been unusually busy and they just didn’t notice.

This virus sends a solid percentage to the hospital.



What’s a “solid percentage”? I’m a healthy female in my early 30s.
Posted by Argonaut
Member since Nov 2015
2059 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 8:17 pm to
Money doesn't spend when you're dead.
Posted by Steadmans Cheddar
Member since Dec 2019
1347 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 8:18 pm to
quote:

If I could guarantee you that you had zero risk of catching the coronavirus in return for bankrupting yourself and not recovering for X years, what max value for X would you be OK with and take the deal?


This is not as preposterous a question as many are interpreting thus to be, though it does show that pure economics can be a bit harshly emotionless.

Legitimate follow up to set parameters: is everyone in America going to be pretty financially hurt no matter what my answer is? It’s going to be easier to take bankruptcy if you know that you and everyone else are going to be taking a bit of a hit anyway,
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
39749 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 8:18 pm to
quote:

I’m a healthy female in my early 30s.


Pics?
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 8:19 pm to
quote:

Money doesn't spend when you're dead.
Here. Let me guarantee I'm fricked for life in return for avoiding a sub 1% risk!!!!

Genius
Posted by TimeOutdoors
LA
Member since Sep 2014
13113 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 8:19 pm to
For the record I down voted. This is exactly why you have a rainy day account. It's also why you go ahead and pay down debt when you can even though your interest rates low.
Posted by Hurricane Mike
Member since Jun 2008
20059 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 8:19 pm to
quote:

the concept of sunk cost


Is why we should do a 14 day lockdown now and get it over with. We've destroyed capital for around 9 days now and counting. We started shutting things down over a few deaths, so are we going to bring things back with a few deaths still happening? What do you win in that scenario?

Shut it down for 2 weeks, kill the virus, move on with life. Every day that passes is another day we're funding socialism for the lost economy.
Posted by cajuncarguy
On the road...Again!
Member since Jun 2013
3135 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 8:20 pm to
Pretty simple. Those you up voted are leaders. Those who down voters. Those who did nothing are the muddy middle.
Posted by longwayfromLA
NYC
Member since Nov 2007
3331 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 8:21 pm to
quote:

Are you under the impression we are at risk of 600K dead?

If so, then, you have to answer how much lower that number would be doing lock down? Because THAT is the relevant number. It ain't like you're gonna save everyone.


I think all the math I've seen is extrapolating from a relatively small number and there is risk in that. The figures that compelled the US & Uk into action came from the Imperial College COVID-19 Response Team. Their number was in the low millions in terms of deaths. This was the image that freaked the UK and US government out.



I guess my point is. Eventually, if enough people die there will be tremendous pressure to do something, in particular in an election year. That something will end up being a lockdown. All roads point that way, and if that's true then, earlier is clearly better than later.
Posted by Argonaut
Member since Nov 2015
2059 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 8:21 pm to
quote:

Here. Let me guarantee I'm fricked for life in return for avoiding a sub 1% risk!!!!


It isn't a sub 1% risk.
Posted by longwayfromLA
NYC
Member since Nov 2007
3331 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 8:23 pm to
quote:


the problem is in a few weeks when we start relaxing things and the spread starts again


The real problem is month from now when you have tens of thousands of now immune corona survivors who will have no reason to fear going outside. How we manage that population will be interesting.
Posted by Buckeye Jeaux
Member since May 2018
17756 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 8:23 pm to
And once the country is completely bankrupt, how long until the ChiCom army comes strolling across the Mexican and Canadian borders to "help us out"?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466834 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 8:23 pm to
quote:

Is why we should do a 14 day lockdown now and get it over with.

that won't do shite though
Posted by Paluka
One State Over
Member since Dec 2010
10763 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 8:24 pm to
quote:

BobBoucher


Honest question...is the plan to stop social distancing one area of the country at a time to assure we have enough critical care and icu beds available? I know this may seem like a dumb question but we know the cases will spike when we come out of hiding. It seems like the only plan that might make sense.

Thoughts?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466834 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 8:25 pm to
quote:

It isn't a sub 1% risk.

the total death rate in the US is well below 1% when you account for all the positives who weren't tested

with skewed testing and deaths, it's like 1.3% in the US
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram