- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Here's a lawsuit filed by 3rd party against DOD over Signal Chat- Boasberg gets the case
Posted on 3/26/25 at 10:39 am to SingleMalt1973
Posted on 3/26/25 at 10:39 am to SingleMalt1973
Judge choice reminds me of the Cannon selection. At worst, tit for tat.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 11:38 am to LSUnation78
The democrats always go too far. And they are still unaccountable.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 11:47 am to TigerB8
they are so batshit that there comes a point (NOW) that they go way too far and the drama no longer works, and no one cares.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 12:02 pm to idlewatcher
Why would a phone ostensibly used for government stuff with government contacts have non government types in the contacts?
I don't think there was some nefarious action, I believe Waltz had Goldberg in his contacts and another guy guy with the initials of JG as well. I think whomever made the list was sloppy. Occam's Razor : Simplest answer tends to be best
I don't think there was some nefarious action, I believe Waltz had Goldberg in his contacts and another guy guy with the initials of JG as well. I think whomever made the list was sloppy. Occam's Razor : Simplest answer tends to be best
Posted on 3/26/25 at 12:10 pm to KiwiHead
He thought he was adding his aipac handler most likely.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 12:15 pm to ManBearSharkReb
quote:
He thought he was adding his aipac handler most likely.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 12:22 pm to KiwiHead
quote:
I don't think there was some nefarious action, I believe Waltz had Goldberg in his contacts and another guy guy with the initials of JG as well. I think whomever made the list was sloppy. Occam's Razor : Simplest answer tends to be best
Normally, sure, but we've seen Dems do this type of frickery over and over. Its seems pretty simple to believe they would continue.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 12:29 pm to Jbird
boasbergs court actions have no merit. His only reason is to obstruct the Trump administration.
If that worm roberts won't
reign in boasberg's court,
then boasberg's court should be the first district court to be abolished by congress.
robert's is probably intentionally not doing anything from a legal standpoint because he is partial to the left.
The marxists pulled similar crap, with the fake impeachments, in President Trump's first term. Congress should not allow the scum left to pull the same stunt again!
If that worm roberts won't
reign in boasberg's court,
then boasberg's court should be the first district court to be abolished by congress.
robert's is probably intentionally not doing anything from a legal standpoint because he is partial to the left.
The marxists pulled similar crap, with the fake impeachments, in President Trump's first term. Congress should not allow the scum left to pull the same stunt again!
Posted on 3/27/25 at 4:38 am to TigerB8
anybody reading the OP not seeing the lawfare is
-a failing pathetic troll
-a complete brainwashed, marxist, democrat moron
-getting paid from Actbluey in controlled opposition.
-a failing pathetic troll
-a complete brainwashed, marxist, democrat moron
-getting paid from Actbluey in controlled opposition.
This post was edited on 3/27/25 at 4:43 am
Posted on 3/27/25 at 5:34 am to TigerB8
And they had the nerve to say it was "Just A Random Pick".
This is the democrat shite we all voted to get rid of.
Random My arse
Trump ally Mike Davis on X, formerly Twitter, on Wednesday: "Dear House Judiciary Chairman @Jim_Jordan: Order Chief DC Obama Judge Jeb Boasberg to come explain his court's 'random' assignment of cases."
Activist and author Jack Posobiec on X, on Wednesday, reacting to Boasberg's new assignment: "Heavy artillery moving into position. The Op is on"
Conservative influencer Nick Sotor on X, on Wednesday: "?? WTF?! Judge Boasberg, the activist judge BLOCKING Trump from deporting violent gang members, intentionally DELAYED the release of Hillary Clinton's emails until after the 2016 election
He's also now 'coincidentally' presiding over the Signal case This is RIGGED! How do people not see that?"
This is the democrat shite we all voted to get rid of.
Random My arse
Trump ally Mike Davis on X, formerly Twitter, on Wednesday: "Dear House Judiciary Chairman @Jim_Jordan: Order Chief DC Obama Judge Jeb Boasberg to come explain his court's 'random' assignment of cases."
Activist and author Jack Posobiec on X, on Wednesday, reacting to Boasberg's new assignment: "Heavy artillery moving into position. The Op is on"
Conservative influencer Nick Sotor on X, on Wednesday: "?? WTF?! Judge Boasberg, the activist judge BLOCKING Trump from deporting violent gang members, intentionally DELAYED the release of Hillary Clinton's emails until after the 2016 election
He's also now 'coincidentally' presiding over the Signal case This is RIGGED! How do people not see that?"
Posted on 3/27/25 at 6:39 am to TDTOM
quote:
They are trying to obstruct Trump and his agenda in any way possible.
Dem lawmakers have said as much from the beginning. They vowed to keep him in court with their corrupt judges in order to slow down his agenda.
Posted on 3/27/25 at 6:40 am to KiwiHead
quote:
I don't think there was some nefarious action,
I do!
Is this a government phone or a personal phone with added contacts and the app?
Why are the reporters on the Venmo app ? That is personal - better not have frickin Venmo in govt phone
Too much for honest mistake - some intentional actions going on
This post was edited on 3/27/25 at 6:42 am
Posted on 3/27/25 at 6:44 am to LSUnation78
quote:
Why is this a lawsuit?
None of this shite makes any sense
Because rather than having their children watching 'schoolhouse rock' back in the day, the current powers were molesting them instead.
Now we've got this. . .
This post was edited on 3/27/25 at 7:47 am
Posted on 3/27/25 at 6:44 am to idlewatcher
quote:
Who programmed names in the chat? Also, there should be a chain of custody of who handled that phone.
Doesn’t matter who handled it if our IC has backdoors installed.
Posted on 3/27/25 at 6:49 am to TigerB8
A real judge would rule that the plaintiff has no standing and throw the suit out in the first day
Posted on 3/27/25 at 6:59 am to FriedEggBowL
quote:
A real judge would rule that the plaintiff has no standing and throw the suit out in the first day
Yeah. I am wondering about the right of action here.
Back to top

0








