Started By
Message

re: Here's a lawsuit filed by 3rd party against DOD over Signal Chat- Boasberg gets the case

Posted on 3/26/25 at 10:39 am to
Posted by TinyTim
Member since Oct 2023
33 posts
Posted on 3/26/25 at 10:39 am to
Judge choice reminds me of the Cannon selection. At worst, tit for tat.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
162498 posts
Posted on 3/26/25 at 11:38 am to
The democrats always go too far. And they are still unaccountable.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
162498 posts
Posted on 3/26/25 at 11:47 am to
they are so batshit that there comes a point (NOW) that they go way too far and the drama no longer works, and no one cares.
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
35843 posts
Posted on 3/26/25 at 12:02 pm to
Why would a phone ostensibly used for government stuff with government contacts have non government types in the contacts?

I don't think there was some nefarious action, I believe Waltz had Goldberg in his contacts and another guy guy with the initials of JG as well. I think whomever made the list was sloppy. Occam's Razor : Simplest answer tends to be best
Posted by ManBearSharkReb
Member since Dec 2018
5409 posts
Posted on 3/26/25 at 12:10 pm to
He thought he was adding his aipac handler most likely.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
84432 posts
Posted on 3/26/25 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

He thought he was adding his aipac handler most likely.


that’s pretty spicy. I like it.
Posted by lake chuck fan
Vinton
Member since Aug 2011
21256 posts
Posted on 3/26/25 at 12:22 pm to
quote:


I don't think there was some nefarious action, I believe Waltz had Goldberg in his contacts and another guy guy with the initials of JG as well. I think whomever made the list was sloppy. Occam's Razor : Simplest answer tends to be best


Normally, sure, but we've seen Dems do this type of frickery over and over. Its seems pretty simple to believe they would continue.
Posted by geoag58
Member since Nov 2011
1583 posts
Posted on 3/26/25 at 12:29 pm to
boasbergs court actions have no merit. His only reason is to obstruct the Trump administration.

If that worm roberts won't
reign in boasberg's court,
then boasberg's court should be the first district court to be abolished by congress.

robert's is probably intentionally not doing anything from a legal standpoint because he is partial to the left.

The marxists pulled similar crap, with the fake impeachments, in President Trump's first term. Congress should not allow the scum left to pull the same stunt again!
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
162498 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 4:38 am to
anybody reading the OP not seeing the lawfare is

-a failing pathetic troll
-a complete brainwashed, marxist, democrat moron
-getting paid from Actbluey in controlled opposition.
This post was edited on 3/27/25 at 4:43 am
Posted by The Torch
DFW The Dub
Member since Aug 2014
27590 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 5:34 am to
And they had the nerve to say it was "Just A Random Pick".

This is the democrat shite we all voted to get rid of.

Random My arse


Trump ally Mike Davis on X, formerly Twitter, on Wednesday: "Dear House Judiciary Chairman @Jim_Jordan: Order Chief DC Obama Judge Jeb Boasberg to come explain his court's 'random' assignment of cases."

Activist and author Jack Posobiec on X, on Wednesday, reacting to Boasberg's new assignment: "Heavy artillery moving into position. The Op is on"

Conservative influencer Nick Sotor on X, on Wednesday: "?? WTF?! Judge Boasberg, the activist judge BLOCKING Trump from deporting violent gang members, intentionally DELAYED the release of Hillary Clinton's emails until after the 2016 election

He's also now 'coincidentally' presiding over the Signal case This is RIGGED! How do people not see that?"
Posted by Jay Quest
Once removed from Massachusetts
Member since Nov 2009
10683 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 6:39 am to
quote:

They are trying to obstruct Trump and his agenda in any way possible.

Dem lawmakers have said as much from the beginning. They vowed to keep him in court with their corrupt judges in order to slow down his agenda.

Posted by dafif
Member since Jan 2019
7898 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 6:40 am to
quote:

I don't think there was some nefarious action,


I do!

Is this a government phone or a personal phone with added contacts and the app?

Why are the reporters on the Venmo app ? That is personal - better not have frickin Venmo in govt phone

Too much for honest mistake - some intentional actions going on
This post was edited on 3/27/25 at 6:42 am
Posted by BozemanTiger
Member since Jul 2020
4520 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 6:44 am to
quote:

Why is this a lawsuit?

None of this shite makes any sense


Because rather than having their children watching 'schoolhouse rock' back in the day, the current powers were molesting them instead.

Now we've got this. . .
This post was edited on 3/27/25 at 7:47 am
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
20310 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 6:44 am to
quote:

Who programmed names in the chat? Also, there should be a chain of custody of who handled that phone.

Doesn’t matter who handled it if our IC has backdoors installed.
Posted by FriedEggBowL
MS
Member since Nov 2021
1426 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 6:49 am to
A real judge would rule that the plaintiff has no standing and throw the suit out in the first day
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
112443 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 6:59 am to
quote:

A real judge would rule that the plaintiff has no standing and throw the suit out in the first day


Yeah. I am wondering about the right of action here.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram