Started By
Message

Here we go House Dems propose ammendment in bill to allow illegal immigrants right to vote

Posted on 9/21/22 at 4:43 pm
Posted by burger bearcat
Member since Oct 2020
8860 posts
Posted on 9/21/22 at 4:43 pm
We knew it was coming to this.. All they care about is their own power and finding ways to obtain more of it.

LINK

quote:

House Judiciary GOP

@JudiciaryGOP

#BREAKING: Judiciary Democrats just voted to support NON-CITIZENS voting in our elections.

1:59 PM · Sep 21, 2022





This post was edited on 9/21/22 at 4:47 pm
Posted by NashvilleTider
Your Mom
Member since Jan 2007
11375 posts
Posted on 9/21/22 at 4:45 pm to
I hate these people with a real hate
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26388 posts
Posted on 9/21/22 at 4:45 pm to
I do not Twit so I cannot scroll through the link. But the screen grab you posted states the exact opposite of what your thread title says.
Posted by themunch
Earth. maybe
Member since Jan 2007
64661 posts
Posted on 9/21/22 at 4:45 pm to
20 million new votes
Posted by dgnx6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
68670 posts
Posted on 9/21/22 at 4:46 pm to
Let’s let Russia vote and see what they say.
Posted by burger bearcat
Member since Oct 2020
8860 posts
Posted on 9/21/22 at 4:49 pm to
quote:

I do not Twit so I cannot scroll through the link. But the screen grab you posted states the exact opposite of what your thread title says.


I think it's the part about striking this section out
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80267 posts
Posted on 9/21/22 at 4:49 pm to
Doesn’t the predicate say “Nothing in this section may be construed to:…”

Am I taking crazy pills?
Posted by CDawson
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2017
16417 posts
Posted on 9/21/22 at 4:49 pm to
Why do they need illegals to vote when they completely control the voting anyway? After what I saw in 2020, does it really matter who votes and who doesn't?
Posted by 14&Counting
Eugene, OR
Member since Jul 2012
37638 posts
Posted on 9/21/22 at 4:51 pm to
quote:

Judiciary Democrats


A whose who of assholes
Posted by oldskule
Down South
Member since Mar 2016
15476 posts
Posted on 9/21/22 at 4:53 pm to
ILLEGAL immigrant / vote

That dose not compute!
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
99057 posts
Posted on 9/21/22 at 4:53 pm to
Now now, they’re no more assholes than the rest of the Dems, who are huge gaping assholes.
Posted by BestBanker
Member since Nov 2011
17479 posts
Posted on 9/21/22 at 4:54 pm to
Only for news headlines.

Must be citizen.
Posted by keakar
Member since Jan 2017
30031 posts
Posted on 9/21/22 at 4:55 pm to
quote:

Here we go House Dems propose ammendment in bill to allow illegal immigrants right to vote


i hope the stories are true that most illegals hate socialism and would vote republican if given a chance. it would be a glorious frickup on their assumptions if thats true.

but im also thinking they would never be doing this, unless they already knew, exactly how they will vote
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26388 posts
Posted on 9/21/22 at 4:56 pm to
quote:

think it's the part about striking this section out

But the quoted section starting at line 1 is being entered into the bill.
This post was edited on 9/21/22 at 4:58 pm
Posted by NCIS_76
Member since Jan 2021
5246 posts
Posted on 9/21/22 at 4:56 pm to
You can’t be serious. We told the Democrats this was coming. But, oh no you are wrong they said.
Posted by Huey Lewis
BR
Member since Oct 2013
4653 posts
Posted on 9/21/22 at 4:57 pm to
Isn't this saying to move section g to page 2? What does page 2 say?
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68279 posts
Posted on 9/21/22 at 4:58 pm to
quote:

Doesn’t the predicate say “Nothing in this section may be construed to:…”
That section is being stricken. Now, we don't see section H so maybe it contains the same language and something else about it is different.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26388 posts
Posted on 9/21/22 at 4:59 pm to
quote:

That section is being stricken. Now, we don't see section H so maybe it contains the same language and something else about it is different.

I don’t understand how you are reading it that way. It says, specifically, “insert the following”.


I haven’t seen the full bill, but ITT it seems like people are conflating what so happens to be labeled as subsection (g) on Page 2 with the first sentence about Page 1.

Nothing in that screen grab indicates that the quoted language is being removed.
This post was edited on 9/21/22 at 5:01 pm
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68279 posts
Posted on 9/21/22 at 5:01 pm to
It says strike subsection G and add Subsection H. They then show you what us being stricken, section G.

Clearly we're not getting the entire picture as I said earlier.
This post was edited on 9/21/22 at 5:03 pm
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26388 posts
Posted on 9/21/22 at 5:02 pm to
quote:

It says strike subsection G and add Subsection H. They then show you what us being stricken, section G.

But that isn’t what it shows. (g) that was removed from page 1 and replaced with (h) may or may not be the same subsection (g) that is added to page two, but in any event the language listed beginning at line 1 of that screenshot is being added to the bill.
This post was edited on 9/21/22 at 5:05 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram