- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Hate to see it
Posted on 7/21/26 at 7:37 pm
Posted on 7/21/26 at 7:37 pm
paging Waltz and Newsome
Love it's happening.
Quick Slow, tell us which judge will step in. Fatigue is real

Love it's happening.
Quick Slow, tell us which judge will step in. Fatigue is real
quote:
HHS Defers More Than $1 Billion in Medicaid Payments to California, Minnesota Pending Review of High-Risk Claims in Crackdown on Fraud
WASHINGTON—JULY 21, 2026—The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) today deferred more than $1 billion in federal Medicaid payments to California and Minnesota as the states submit additional documentation supporting certain high-risk Medicaid claims. The action advances the Trump administration’s effort to combat fraud, waste, and abuse in Medicaid and safeguard federal taxpayer dollars.
“Medicaid exists to serve vulnerable Americans — not to bankroll unsupported claims,” said HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. “Under President Trump’s leadership, we are restoring accountability across our public programs and protecting taxpayer dollars. I appreciate CMS Administrator Dr. Oz’s leadership in strengthening Medicaid program integrity and ensuring federal funds are spent as Congress intended. States that receive federal Medicaid funding must demonstrate that every dollar meets federal requirements. When they cannot, we will not release federal funds until they do.”
CMS is deferring approximately $867.5 million in federal Medicaid payments to California and $199 million to Minnesota after focused financial reviews identified claims that require additional review before federal matching funds are released. These are payment deferrals (not permanent funding cuts) and both states will have the opportunity to provide documentation showing the claims meet federal Medicaid requirements.
Additionally, under Secretary Kennedy’s direction, HHS and the HHS Office of Inspector General continue to exercise exclusion authorities as a critical tool to remove bad actors from Medicare and Medicaid programs — and, in many cases, permanently bar them from returning.
“CMS is done trying to chase down stolen and misused funds after they’ve already left the building,” said CMS Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz. “That’s why we’re deferring payments with respect to certain high-risk services within the Medicaid programs in California and Minnesota as part of our proactive new approach to program integrity. By stopping waste and fraud before the check clears, CMS is delivering record-high savings for taxpayers and ensuring that their hard-earned dollars reach the vulnerable Americans Medicaid is meant to serve.”
CALIFORNIA
CMS reviewed California’s claims for certain in-home care programs after identifying spending growth that far exceeded national trends and other claims that require additional documentation. As a result, CMS is deferring approximately $867.5 million in federal Medicaid payments until the state provides the information needed to support those claims.
MINNESOTA
CMS also reviewed Medicaid claims in 14 high-risk service areas in Minnesota. The review identified claims that require additional documentation, including expenditures linked to providers flagged through program integrity reviews and other claims with potential eligibility or billing concerns. CMS is deferring approximately $199 million in federal Medicaid payments while that review continues.
The Trump administration is committed to rooting out fraud, waste, and abuse across the federal government. HHS will continue to aggressively protect taxpayer dollars and hold states accountable for every federal Medicaid dollar they spend
Posted on 7/21/26 at 7:40 pm to March1st
Oh noz…poor California trans kids won’t get their top surgery!!!
Posted on 7/21/26 at 7:43 pm to Robin Masters
quote:
Oh noz…poor California trans kids won’t get their top surgery!!!
Muh genocidez!!11!
Posted on 7/21/26 at 7:44 pm to March1st
Hypothetically speaking How would someone go about conducting some fraud?
Asking for a friend
Asking for a friend
Posted on 7/21/26 at 7:48 pm to Purple Spoon
quote:
Hypothetically speaking How would someone go about conducting some fraud?
Run for office as a Democrat is probably the fastest.
Posted on 7/21/26 at 7:51 pm to March1st
Downvoters to the OP must be on the take.
Posted on 7/21/26 at 7:54 pm to March1st
So when CA and MN provide fraudulent supporting documentation in response to the request, who will be arrested on Federal fraud charges?
Posted on 7/21/26 at 7:59 pm to March1st
It's gonna take many years, consecutive republican administrations, and extreme discipline to root out the fraud and waste in our government
Posted on 7/21/26 at 8:03 pm to Purple Spoon
quote:
Hypothetically speaking How would someone go about conducting some fraud?
1. Use voter apathy in an off cycle to get a bartender or Somalian elected to Congress in a particular district.
2. Have that person advocate for her nonexistent constituents.
3. Set up shell companies in said district.
4. Buy off anyone in oversight positions with promises of kickbacks.
5. Use shell companies to apply for federal grants and other programs.
6. When the money rolls in, laugh all the way to the bank.
Posted on 7/21/26 at 8:08 pm to OscarTheGrouch
quote:I know a certain Florida governor that excels at rooting out fraud and waste.
It's gonna take many years, consecutive republican administrations, and extreme discipline to root out the fraud and waste in our government
Posted on 7/21/26 at 8:14 pm to OscarTheGrouch
You have no idea how quickly AI can work, assist and lead efforts.
quote:
how can AI help find fraud in Government spending by California and Minnesota?
+19
Artificial intelligence helps state and federal agencies detect government spending fraud by shifting from reactive audits to proactive, real-time data analysis. By flagging suspicious patterns before taxpayer dollars are distributed, AI stops "pay and chase" scenarios. States like California and Minnesota actively use machine learning and AI analytics to combat waste and improper payments. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
How AI Identifies Fraud
Anomaly Detection: AI models scan millions of daily transactions to instantly highlight outliers, such as healthcare providers billing for an impossible number of patients per day or claims that exceed standard geographic or demographic trends. [1, 2, 3]
Cross-Database Verification: AI cross-references state and federal data to catch schemes, such as identifying payments made to deceased individuals or individuals whose immigration status cannot be verified. [1, 2, 3]
Document and Signature Analysis: Machine learning quickly spots forged signatures or "cut-and-paste" tactics where the same language and documentation are duplicated across dozens of different claims. [1]
Vendor and Entity Resolution: AI reconciles complex vendor names and identifies overlapping ownership structures—uncovering cases where shell companies are used to bypass state contractor registries. [1, 2]
State and Federal Initiatives
Governments are heavily integrating AI to protect taxpayer dollars, though the rollout has sparked policy debates between state and federal officials regarding oversight: [1]
Federal Crackdowns: The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) have utilized advanced AI platforms to identify high-risk Medicaid billing patterns. [1, 2]
California and Minnesota Actions: Both states have faced significant federal fund deferrals from CMS (over $1 billion) over suspected fraud and audit compliance concerns. In response, Minnesota has piloted preemptive AI models to analyze social assistance anomalies and expanded its anti-fraud divisions. [
The Treasury's "Do Not Pay" portal: The U.S. Treasury integrates AI and cross-agency data sources—such as death records and tax information—to prevent improper payments across federally-funded, state-administered programs. [1, 2]
Agencies utilize the U.S. Government Accountability Office reports to implement responsible AI frameworks that improve data-matching processes
Posted on 7/21/26 at 8:27 pm to Barstools
So when CA and MN provide fraudulent supporting documentation in response to the request, who will be arrested on Federal fraud charges?
+12
If the states of California (CA) and Minnesota (MN) provide fraudulent supporting documentation in response to a federal request, federal authorities would likely target the specific individuals who authorized, created, or submitted the documents. Depending on their roles, those arrested would generally include the appointed state officials, agency directors, or contracted individuals directly responsible for the submission. [1, 2]
Federal investigators generally apply the following statutes in these scenarios:
Making False Statements to the Federal Government (18 U.S.C. Section 1001): This statute makes it a felony to knowingly and willfully falsify, conceal, or cover up a material fact, or to submit false writings or documents to any branch of the U.S. government. [1, 2, 3]
Major Fraud Against the United States (18 U.S.C. Section 1031): This law penalizes individuals who execute a scheme or artifice to defraud the U.S. or to obtain money/property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises involving federal funds. [1, 2]
Wire Fraud (18 U.S.C. Section 1343): Often used in tandem with other charges, this applies if the fraudulent documents or communications were transmitted via interstate wires (e.g., email, digital submission portals). [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Because a state is a governmental entity, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) prosecutes the bad actors as individuals rather than the state itself. The specific people arrested would be the state officials or employees whose signatures or verifiable actions tie them directly to the submission of the false records. [1, 2, 3, 4]
You can track federal fraud takedowns and enforcement actions at the Department of Justice or monitor specific cases regarding public program integrity through the FBI white-collar crime reporting portal
[/quote]
+12
If the states of California (CA) and Minnesota (MN) provide fraudulent supporting documentation in response to a federal request, federal authorities would likely target the specific individuals who authorized, created, or submitted the documents. Depending on their roles, those arrested would generally include the appointed state officials, agency directors, or contracted individuals directly responsible for the submission. [1, 2]
Federal investigators generally apply the following statutes in these scenarios:
Making False Statements to the Federal Government (18 U.S.C. Section 1001): This statute makes it a felony to knowingly and willfully falsify, conceal, or cover up a material fact, or to submit false writings or documents to any branch of the U.S. government. [1, 2, 3]
Major Fraud Against the United States (18 U.S.C. Section 1031): This law penalizes individuals who execute a scheme or artifice to defraud the U.S. or to obtain money/property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises involving federal funds. [1, 2]
Wire Fraud (18 U.S.C. Section 1343): Often used in tandem with other charges, this applies if the fraudulent documents or communications were transmitted via interstate wires (e.g., email, digital submission portals). [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Because a state is a governmental entity, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) prosecutes the bad actors as individuals rather than the state itself. The specific people arrested would be the state officials or employees whose signatures or verifiable actions tie them directly to the submission of the false records. [1, 2, 3, 4]
You can track federal fraud takedowns and enforcement actions at the Department of Justice or monitor specific cases regarding public program integrity through the FBI white-collar crime reporting portal
[/quote]
Popular
Back to top
6








