- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 10/29/22 at 12:31 pm to SUB
quote:
So why is everyone so quick to believe the details about the underwear? It’s being repeated over and over on these threads and there seems to be no source for this information. I get it for the other stuff on the dispatch audio. But this?
We have many naked pictures of this dude in public. It’s be like doubting a girl who happened to be at R Kelly’s mansion being pissed all over:
Posted on 10/29/22 at 12:34 pm to Havoc
quote:
Definitely gay sex stuff and dude got mad for some reason and was threatening to tell Nancy and got violent. Pretty simple really.
No one goes in and out of Nancy’s mansion without her knowing about it. Those two haven’t fricked since the Reagan administration, and quite frankly I don’t blame him for going gay after being married to a ghoul like Nancy Pelosi. To paraphrase our former President:
Posted on 10/29/22 at 12:35 pm to OMLandshark
The counterargument is it can't be true because a SF news station retracted it. Don't wonder why they would just randomly report that initially. The retraction is the proof that it's not true.
Posted on 10/29/22 at 12:38 pm to DJFord
quote:
So for this to be a false flag as you and OMlandshark are implying, Democrats would have to find an idiot who will post crazy right wing QAnon crap for years, scare people he worked with claiming to be doing God’s work, then have him break in to Pelosi’s house with Nancy not there and crack open Paul’s head in front of the cops (yes they witnessed it) but
I’m not claiming this is a false flag. I’m claiming this is likely a gay sex quarrel that got out of control and they’re fricking lying about it. This is the simplest and likely correct answer. There’s no way that guy got in there without one of the Pelosis’ help.
Posted on 10/29/22 at 1:32 pm to TigerCoon
Posted on 10/29/22 at 2:16 pm to SUB
quote:
So why is everyone so quick to believe the details about the underwear?
because it was reported as such. Are you saying we shouldn't believe media reports?
quote:
CORRECTION: An earlier version of this story misstated what clothing the suspect was wearing when officers found him.
but....but....you're not supposed to believer media reports right? So am I not to believe this?
Also....the correction(not redaction) doesn't state him wearing anything different. It doesn't state(as a correction typically should) that he was wearing usual clothing. What was he wearing then? Was it some sort of other sexual clothing that might have been mistaken for underwear?
This post was edited on 10/29/22 at 2:17 pm
Posted on 10/29/22 at 2:38 pm to Jones
Not when she’s not there hoss.
Posted on 10/29/22 at 2:40 pm to pankReb
quote:
Did you work at her house?
I worked on the republican side, y’all have zero fricking clue how Capitol police details work
Posted on 10/29/22 at 2:43 pm to Jjdoc
Dems only ask questions of the other side. Every thing else is okie dokies.
Posted on 10/29/22 at 2:46 pm to pankReb
quote:
some sort of other sexual clothing that might have been mistaken for underwear
you mean Paul is really Paula and was wearing a dildo garment??
Wow!! that would score big in the LGBQWERTY world
Posted on 10/29/22 at 2:57 pm to Jjdoc
Let's say their is a legit reason for that, if we are fighting enough for you to desire to call 911, would I let you go to the bathroom? Where you just happen to have a cell phone charging.
Posted on 10/29/22 at 2:59 pm to phaz
it`s all fake dont be fooled,Paul is in gitmo
Posted on 10/29/22 at 3:30 pm to OweO
Posted on 10/29/22 at 3:36 pm to WaWaWeeWa
quote:
Uhhhh I think trusting the media is the definition of mental illness. Have you been in a coma the last 6 years?
Jesus Christ I can’t believe we still have people in this country that trust the main stream media narrative. Your IQ must be room temperature.
Where did I say that I trusted the media you brilliant IQ of a person? Your reading comprehension skills are horrible.
Posted on 10/29/22 at 3:45 pm to pankReb
quote:
but....but....you're not supposed to believer media reports right? So am I not to believe this?
I don’t know baw. You tell me which one you believe and why. The initial report or the retraction?
Not sure why so many are hellbent on this detail being true when there is little to no evidence to support it.
Posted on 11/14/22 at 7:25 pm to Jjdoc
New details on this story.
Fox news
I still don’t understand how pelosi opened the door for officers. Would love to hear that explanation. The quote above says he opened the door in the first paragraph, and in the second, officers opened the door. Just wtf is going on here?
Fox news
quote:
The encounter lasted just 15 seconds from when Pelosi opened the door for officers to when the hammer attack took place, according to the filing, and was recorded on the body-worn cameras of two responding officers.
"The two officers opened the door to see the foyer of the Pelosi Residence, Mr. Pelosi, wearing a long-sleeved shirt, DEPAPE in shorts, running shoes and a sweatshirt, and DEPAPE and Mr. Pelosi jointly gripping a hammer," the indictment reads.
I still don’t understand how pelosi opened the door for officers. Would love to hear that explanation. The quote above says he opened the door in the first paragraph, and in the second, officers opened the door. Just wtf is going on here?
This post was edited on 11/14/22 at 7:28 pm
Posted on 11/14/22 at 7:27 pm to Jjdoc
Paul wanted a blower first, and it got pissy!
Nancy has buried this fiasco....what a fricked up (rich) family.
Nancy has buried this fiasco....what a fricked up (rich) family.
Posted on 11/14/22 at 8:00 pm to DCtiger1
quote:
quote:
Did you work at her house?
I worked on the republican side, y’all have zero fricking clue how Capitol police details work
The capitol police do have a field office in San Francisco. They also have live feeds to their DC offices, but they said they were not "actively monitored" at the time so we are to believe there is no video of it???
The fella was in his underwear, what Ive only seen mentioned once is that Pelosi was in pajama top and boxers. I dont know of any man who sleeps dressed like that, girls often, but guys? Seems he was not "asleep".
The security that covers that road (there is only about a dozen homes) said they do not have a contract for her house, which I would take to mean she has her own security.
Consider this fellas, whether she is home or not, she is 2nd in line, there would definitely be security to be certain no one was planting wires etc. while they were not home. Its ignorant to think there was no security nor cameras working....unless it was for a reason.
There was one hammer and boxer boy took it from Pelosi.
Posted on 11/14/22 at 8:10 pm to Jjdoc
Nothing to see here. Move along.
Page 6 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News