re: Greenpeace co-founder tells of the climate change hoax and importance of CO2

He admitted for several decades ago that Green Peace never could get the data they "Wanted" and much of their data for the "Climate" hoax is fraudulent! The other little dirty secret is much of today's Climate Cult fraudulent models is feed first to fifth generation data from Green Peace, basically garbage in/out!

It’s not complicated.
Measure temperature.
Take average temperature over period of time.
See average temperature go up every year.

There is no way to debate or deny this.
Can debate causes and long term impacts on planet.

I guess that settles it, then.

quote:

---

So basically he’s saying that CO2 is like oxygen. We get too much, we get too high, not enough & we’re gonna die.

---

Many individuals got a Sweet deal because of climate change.

quote:

---

Don't forget about that giant hole in the ozone layer.

---

And grade school teachers would tell us if we didn’t stop using spray deodorant, the giant hole would get bigger and kill us all. It was all over the weekly readers.

quote:

---

Many individuals got a Sweet deal because of climate change.

---

Quite the inconvenient truth, to be sure.

quote:

---

One of my go-to climate change hoax arguments has always been, "what are the benefits of global warming?"

---

You guys are missing the point completely. Hardly anyone on the climate change advocacy side of this argument disagrees that CO2 is important plant food. Making that argument is a gratuitous attempt to sidestep their argument.

Their point is that releasing CO2 as fast as we are - from stored to in the atmosphere - is warming our planet at a rate that will be catastrophic. No one thinks the temperature is too hot, or will be too hot. No one is against warming. What they are against is the RATE of warming. And if they are to be believed about what that rate will be, then they are correct about the need to stop emitting CO2 so much.

Fortunately they seem to be wrong about the rate of warming. At least they have been wrong so far. And they’ve lost credibility.

I want to point out that there are few, if any, who will read this who have been as staunch a warrior against the climate change advocacy as I have been. But it is important to focus our criticism on the actual mistakes and dishonesties of those advocates, not run around making up false positions that are cartoonish, and then slay them to applause of the similarly minded. That gets us plaudits from the already convinced, but it sways no one else.

The climate warriors that conducted a multi
year study that proved the oceans were not
warming concluded all of this bullshite for
me.

What did they do?

They turned in temperature readings from the
hold of their ship. Ballast water Temps.

Go fork yourselves.

You can look it up. I know you will not but I can
provide links.

Blood letting was once settled science

quote:

---

Wrong.

They classified it as a pollutant, nimrod.

---

They classified it as a pollutant so that they could control it without an act of congress, dumbass.

I don’t understand why someone with such a paltry understanding of an issue chooses, not just to forcibly opine on it, but to insult those more knowledgable.