- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Governor Abbott releases statement on sgt perry
Posted on 4/9/23 at 9:28 pm to texridder
Posted on 4/9/23 at 9:28 pm to texridder
quote:
texridder
Have you ever, like once in your life, not been the most stupid person in any room you walked into?
Are you capable of walking and breathing at the same time?
This post was edited on 4/9/23 at 9:28 pm
1
Posted on 4/9/23 at 9:46 pm to texridder
quote:
texridder
What a cuckold.
Posted on 4/9/23 at 9:57 pm to Open Your Eyes
quote:
Have you ever, like once in your life, not been the most stupid person in any room you walked into? Are you capable of walking and breathing at the same time?
This is supposed to be a political discussion bulletin board you dumb arse, red neck.
Try harder not to make a total asse of yourself.
Posted on 4/9/23 at 9:59 pm to texridder
quote:
This is supposed to be a political discussion bulletin board you dumb arse, red neck.
So where's your discussion of the non Gateway Pundit link I provided?
Posted on 4/9/23 at 10:02 pm to texridder
quote:
This is supposed to be a political discussion bulletin board you dumb arse, red neck.
What does that have to do with you being an absolute fricking moron?
quote:
Try harder not to make a total asse of yourself.
Why? You do it every time you post.
Posted on 4/9/23 at 10:20 pm to texridder
quote:
This is supposed to be a political discussion bulletin board you dumb arse, red neck. Try harder not to make a total asse of yourself.
I noticed you skipping over the post that proves he was in fact funded by Soros.
I don’t think you’re the dumbest person in a room. Just the most dishonest one in this thread outside of tigerbait.
Posted on 4/10/23 at 3:48 am to Open Your Eyes
quote:Why don't you post an example, asswipe?
Try harder not to make a total asse of yourself. Why? You do it every time you post.
Posted on 4/10/23 at 5:13 am to texridder
quote:How many pages of exonerating material withheld?
you would come to the same conclusion as the jury.
(Withholding Brady material is still against the law, even in the texridder "justice" system, right?)
A bunch of thugs attacked Perry's car, on a public thoroughfare where he had right to be and THEY DID NOT. Those ar the facts. Then one of them ran toward his car brandishing the kind of scary assault rifle your brethren are so terrified of. He pointed it.
At that stage, it does not much matter what Perry texted or said. The thug pointing the rifle either intends to force him to exit his car (which could be lethal), or to shoot the driver on the spot (which could be lethal).
Pretty damn simple.
Posted on 4/10/23 at 5:25 am to texridder
quote:
Soros
If Soros is a good person with good intentions then why do you leftists get so upset when the right points out that he’s financing the political campaigns of these prosecutors?
The fact that you people want to conceal that Soros is behind these campaigns tells me there’s something nefarious.
Posted on 4/10/23 at 5:45 am to texridder
quote:
quote: BS. He drove on a street where the mob should not have been. Or maybe he drove on that street because he wanted to engage the protesters like he had previously discussed with his friend on social media. And also discussed how he would get away with engaging protesters by claiming self defense.
Perry had as much right, if not more, to be on that street as anybody else on the planet.
If he drove down that street in protest, he also has the right to do that. If he has an "assault rifle" (we know you like that term) pointed @ him, (which is an established fact), he also has the right to defend himself against what any reasonable human being would perceive as a threat of bodily harm, injury, or death. He exercised that right.
"Engaging protestors" is not a crime. In order to claim self-defense there would have to be an act that would require defending himself, which there was. He had an "assault rifle" pointed directly at him, which is a direct threat, & a crime.
I bet your doomazz still thinks Kyle Rittenhouse purchased an "assault rifle", then crossed state lines, & murdered 3 black peaceful protestors in cold blood because he's a white supremacist, right?
Frickin' moron...
Posted on 4/10/23 at 5:59 am to texridder
quote:
Or maybe he drove on that street because he wanted to engage the protesters like he had previously discussed with his friend on social media
Nice to know you can read his thoughts. Doesn’t matter though, it’s a public street and he has a right to drive it. The protesters were breaking the law. I picture 12 retarded Texridders on this jury convicting this man.
Exactly how this happened.
Posted on 4/10/23 at 6:02 am to texridder
quote:
Found the ignorant dumbasse who buys into the line of baseless horseshitee Trump and his disciples spout out- for example, that Soros funded the campagnes of every non-Trump abiding DA in the country.
For example? Let's see one.
You won't provide one, because you can't provide one.
Posted on 4/10/23 at 6:44 am to Epic Cajun
quote:
Have innocent people never been found guilty by a jury?
This. Lot of innnocent people have been found guilty by a jury.
It's especially easy for a jury to be led astray if witnesses lie their asses off. A lot of the witnesses of that shooting were BLM rioters. The go-to for BLM rioters is to lie lie lie whenever someone defends themselves against one of the BLM rioters. Turn the person who defended himself into a racist monster..and turn the blm rioter into a saint.
Posted on 4/10/23 at 7:41 am to Plx1776
quote:
Protesters have said they feared they were being attacked by someone in a car.
quote:
Witnesses have said during the trial that Foster never raised his rifle at Perry. One protester fired shots, he said, at Perry's car after Foster was shot as Perry was leaving the scene
This is from an article about the trial. Tells you the level of the lying from the witnesses. There’s a picture of him when his gun raised and pointed at the driver.
And of course these protesters testified they were afraid of being attacked by the person in the car, so their first instinct is to run up and surround the car. Yup that’s my first instinct, come across a bear that might attack me, I’m going to run up on it and surround it. Complete bs.
And why has the DA not charged the shooter that fired at a fleeing car? That’s attempted murder.
This post was edited on 4/10/23 at 7:43 am
Posted on 4/10/23 at 7:50 am to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:No, they do not. That term means he can remove them for any reason … or none. They are appointed for 6-year terms.
Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles is appointed by the Governor.quote:
Exactly. They serve at his pleasure.
Posted on 4/10/23 at 7:51 am to texridder
Posted on 4/10/23 at 8:02 am to Taxing Authority
quote:It does seem (sort of) to have happened once.
Harris County … DA lets murders go on PR bonds all the time
Posted on 4/10/23 at 8:07 am to the808bass
quote:not in Texas.
The governor has the power to pardon people. If you don’t like it, change the law.
The Texas governor used to have that power, until the 1930s. The citizens of the state didn’t like the governor having that much power, so they took it away from him.
Now, all he can do is make requests to the board of pardons and parole, and then act upon its recommendations.
Posted on 4/10/23 at 8:09 am to texridder
quote:No.
If you read the police interview, see Perry's cell phone records which disprove Perry's claim he was distracted by texting when he drove in the crowd, and see his social media discussions about how he could drive into a crowd and get away with it- you would come to the same conclusion as the jury.
It was a BLM protest. Any shooting would (by definition) be “justified.“
Posted on 4/10/23 at 8:11 am to Toomer Deplorable
quote:And it gives to the jury the power to determine whether any such exercise was “reasonable.“
It is entirely reasonable for a motorist to fear an imminent unlawful threat of seriously bodily harm in such a scenario. Texas law clearly states all citizens have the right to use deadly force in such situations.
Page 12 of 16
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News