Started By
Message

re: Global warming??? I don't think so!!!

Posted on 12/5/14 at 9:55 am to
Posted by Jim Ignatowski
Louisiana
Member since Jul 2013
1383 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 9:55 am to
quote:

I am about as hardcore a AGW skeptic as there is on this board, but, man, that link reads like it came straight from this guy's publicist.


Isn't that the point...do you really trust the guy...or academia... who are mostly left wing libnuts??
This post was edited on 12/5/14 at 9:57 am
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36128 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 10:01 am to
quote:



Yep...I get what you are saying. 20 years worth of data out of 4.5 billion years is just silly. Right?


You actually believe we need 4.5 billion years of data to tell whether its getting warmer or cooler, don't you?

How do you ever adjust the thermostat on your AC? Must be a total mind frick every time. That's a lot of data for you to have to wade through.

Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124053 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 10:20 am to
quote:

You actually believe we need 4.5 billion years of data to tell whether its getting warmer or cooler, don't you?
We are at an interglacial maximum. True?
Posted by Iosh
Bureau of Interstellar Immigration
Member since Dec 2012
18941 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 10:23 am to
quote:

We are at an interglacial maximum. True?
Nobody born in the next couple of millenia is going to be able to answer this question.
Posted by Jim Ignatowski
Louisiana
Member since Jul 2013
1383 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 10:52 am to
quote:

You actually believe we need 4.5 billion years of data to tell whether its getting warmer or cooler, don't you?


How many times during that 4.5 billion years has the earth gotten warmer...or cooler...??? How long during that 4.5 billion years has man been around???

The earth and the weather has been changing for 4.5 billion years...and it will continue to change until it is no more. Your liberal progressive bend on controlling everything does not now and will never apply to this earth....sorry.
Posted by LordoftheManor
Member since Jul 2006
8371 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 10:55 am to
The politicization of global warming makes literature unreadable. Objectivity has been completely lost so each article is agenda pushing one way or the other.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 11:25 am to
quote:

The politicization of global warming makes literature unreadable. Objectivity has been completely lost so each article is agenda pushing one way or the other.

That is why I describe advocates of man made global warming as priests in a religion. You can't argue with someone about their religion and expect them to be objective.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118908 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 11:28 am to
quote:

The politicization of global warming makes literature unreadable. Objectivity has been completely lost so each article is agenda pushing one way or the other.
Posted by CapitalCityDevil
Seattle
Member since Nov 2014
2916 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 11:31 am to


This graph was created by people at NASA, but they are probably just liberals pushing an agenda right?
This post was edited on 12/5/14 at 11:38 am
Posted by Iosh
Bureau of Interstellar Immigration
Member since Dec 2012
18941 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 11:47 am to
quote:

The politicization of global warming makes literature unreadable. Objectivity has been completely lost so each article is agenda pushing one way or the other.
That's why I try to read papers, not articles. Articles are only useful insofar as they might link to papers (and the very useful ones link to several papers in one place).
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112539 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 11:50 am to
quote:

The politicization of global warming makes literature unreadable. Objectivity has been completely lost so each article is agenda pushing one way or the other.


The primary agenda of the GW crowd is transfers of money from the developed world to the 3rd world and de-development (think Marxism).

What is the primary agenda of the GW deniers?
Posted by mtntiger
Asheville, NC
Member since Oct 2003
26652 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 11:53 am to
Nice graph. Why does it only go back to 1880? Why not go back to, say, 1100?

No one disputes that temps have risen since we began emerging from the Little Ice Age. What is in dispute is whether man is causing this latest temperature fluctuation in Earth's history, and, if he is, what can be done about it.

BTW, 130 years is actually a pretty short time period to base a doomsday prophecy on. When it gets to about 500 years, call me. I'll be all ears.
Posted by lsuroadie
South LA
Member since Oct 2007
8399 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 11:58 am to
people still believe in GW?



Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118908 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 11:59 am to
quote:

What is the primary agenda of the GW deniers?


Keep their money.

Seriously, that's it.
Posted by Jim Ignatowski
Louisiana
Member since Jul 2013
1383 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

What is the primary agenda of the GW deniers?


To get the government to stop taking my fricking money and giving it to someone else!!!!
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118908 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 12:02 pm to
The government is very greedy. They will confiscate as much money has possible if we allow them too. +
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
261036 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

The politicization of global warming makes literature unreadable. Objectivity has been completely lost so each article is agenda pushing one way or the other.



Absolutely.
Posted by MMauler
Member since Jun 2013
19216 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

John believes it is because there is a ton of money to be made from the global warming racket . . . $22 billion a year, in fact.


And, that's just the tip of the iceberg -- no pun intended!

If these SCAM artists get their way, we'll be talking TRILLIONS of dollars over the next 10 years.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112539 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 12:03 pm to
quote:

Keep their money. Seriously, that's it.


How about freedom?
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118908 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 12:11 pm to
quote:

How about freedom?


I honestly don't believe the warmers consider freedom one bit. They want money. Especially Wall Street and federal government warmers. Cap and trade is the ultimate money grab perpetrated by the likes of Goldman Sachs who get to play middle man between carbon credit sellers (federal government) and carbon credit buyers (power plants, i.e., electricity users).
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram