- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Global warming??? I don't think so!!!
Posted on 12/5/14 at 7:09 am
Posted on 12/5/14 at 7:09 am
LINK
Well TUba....seems your agenda driven "science" takes another hit. Don't you libs EVER get tired of being wrong?? Nope, I guess not....since ya'll just keep doing it!!
Well TUba....seems your agenda driven "science" takes another hit. Don't you libs EVER get tired of being wrong?? Nope, I guess not....since ya'll just keep doing it!!
15
Posted on 12/5/14 at 8:35 am to Jim Ignatowski
quote:
Well TUba....seems your agenda driven "science" takes another hit. Don't you libs EVER get tired of being wrong?? Nope, I guess not....since ya'll just keep doing it!!
I'm critical of the science, specifically, the overconfidence in an extremely uncertain system (e.g., the specificity of the coefficients, prediction estimates, and causal explanations); however, overconfidence in the alternative (i.e., cooling) deserves scrutiny as well. I think there are far more well-formed criticisms and studies than this borderline conspiracy theory drivel.
Posted on 12/5/14 at 8:43 am to Jim Ignatowski
Seriously dude...
those of us able to source and vett information destroyed this guy and the information you provided via him about 2 weeks ago. you should probably do a little more research.
but be my guest, get your lame arse gotcha moment in and feel good about your participation in the climate change debate
those of us able to source and vett information destroyed this guy and the information you provided via him about 2 weeks ago. you should probably do a little more research.
but be my guest, get your lame arse gotcha moment in and feel good about your participation in the climate change debate
This post was edited on 12/5/14 at 8:45 am
Posted on 12/5/14 at 8:48 am to Cruiserhog
quote:
but be my guest, get your lame arse gotcha moment in and feel good about your participation in the climate change debate
Thanks...I will...
Posted on 12/5/14 at 8:49 am to Jim Ignatowski
He's peddling his book, similar to those how to prepare for the coming market crash scams. Are you really that dumb?
Posted on 12/5/14 at 8:51 am to Jim Ignatowski
quote:
Jim Ignatowski
quote:
I don't think
There's your problem right there.
Posted on 12/5/14 at 8:52 am to Layabout
quote:
He's peddling his book, similar to those how to prepare for the coming market crash scams. Are you really that dumb?
I understand that...but let's scrutinize the credibility of the "global warming alarmist" just as much as this guy or the "Ones peddling global market scams".....
These statements that the "science" has been settled are hogwash....and if you are not agenda driven...like TUba...you understand this.
Posted on 12/5/14 at 8:53 am to BayouBlitz
quote:
There's your problem right there.
...oh man!!!..your criticism is withering!!! Please stop it!!!
This post was edited on 12/5/14 at 8:54 am
Posted on 12/5/14 at 8:56 am to Jim Ignatowski
....by the way...where is TUBA????Shouldn't he be along soon with some charts, articles and sarcasm???
Posted on 12/5/14 at 8:58 am to Jim Ignatowski
quote:It's not like your OP was an informative point to begin with. It seems clear that you will latch on to any internet drivel that supports your conspiracy theories.
..oh man!!!..your criticism is withering!!! Please stop it!!!
Posted on 12/5/14 at 9:05 am to Jim Ignatowski
quote:
I understand that...but let's scrutinize the credibility of the "global warming alarmist" just as much as this guy or the "Ones peddling global market scams".....
These statements that the "science" has been settled are hogwash....and if you are not agenda driven...like TUba...you understand this.
You could have linked one of the many scientific criticisms of climate change science. Instead you linked a poor source that is patently unscientific and presented as a "gotcha." I think this makes it reasonable to question whether you are willing to think critically about this issue; not unlike questioning those that use An Inconvenient Truth as a "gotcha." Neither source or argument is worth much.
This post was edited on 12/5/14 at 9:08 am
Posted on 12/5/14 at 9:06 am to Jim Ignatowski
That link is just as bad as the MSM links that Tuba posts. It reads like an infomercial.
ETA: wait, it is an infomercial.
ETA: wait, it is an infomercial.
This post was edited on 12/5/14 at 9:08 am
Posted on 12/5/14 at 9:08 am to Jim Ignatowski
Wow. 22 B. That's a lot. Wanna guess at how much the fossil fuel industry profits annually?
From the "white paper":
If the temperature has been dropping ever since, how come it isn't?
Its hard to take a paper seriously that puts so much stock in 1998 and doesn't even mention El Nino
Which paper? Link? Datatset? No? So we can't even really verify that the chart in the "white paper" is correct? We don't even know what its measuring except its temperature of something.
K.
From the "white paper":
quote:
The problem with that argument is that we experienced the bulk of that warming between 1979 and 1998 . . . we’ve actually had temperatures DROPPING ever since!
If the temperature has been dropping ever since, how come it isn't?
Its hard to take a paper seriously that puts so much stock in 1998 and doesn't even mention El Nino
quote:
Just take a look at this chart from Remote Sensing Systems, which provides data to NASA, NOAA, and other scientific organizations.
Which paper? Link? Datatset? No? So we can't even really verify that the chart in the "white paper" is correct? We don't even know what its measuring except its temperature of something.
K.
This post was edited on 12/5/14 at 9:13 am
Posted on 12/5/14 at 9:16 am to Jim Ignatowski
Dude I love the bottom where he begs for money.
No way dude.
Its not a partisan hack piece - its real science - trust me!
quote:
That's a total Value of $180...
in Return for your $5 Contribution Today
AND HERE'S MY PROMISE
I Will NOT Keep a Single Red Cent You Contribute
No way dude. quote:
Liberals like President Obama and Al Gore hope you remain silent on what you have read today.
Its not a partisan hack piece - its real science - trust me!
This post was edited on 12/5/14 at 9:18 am
Posted on 12/5/14 at 9:31 am to Jim Ignatowski
quote:
And another study done by Stephen Goddard at Real Science
Sorry but any 'paper' that lends any credibility to Steve Goddard is a total hack job. Posted on 12/5/14 at 9:31 am to SpidermanTUba
quote:
Its not a partisan hack piece - its real science - trust me!
...trolling goes both ways cuz....
Posted on 12/5/14 at 9:32 am to Jim Ignatowski
Funny I don't recall reading any climate papers from actual scientific journals that mention who is liberal and who is conservative. It goes both ways though, right?
Posted on 12/5/14 at 9:36 am to SpidermanTUba
I gotta say its sad to see a former NASA scientist drop so low he's citing Steve Goddard as evidence of anything.
Let me ask you this Jim - if I take a temperature measurement in the same place and time - say 3 pm - every day for 20 years - and then I decide to change the time of measurement from 3 pm to 3 am - does that mean the Earth has cooled? If I look at the "raw" data from such a weather station, it would seem as if the average temperatures dropped by like 10 or 20 or 30 degrees almost instantly! This is the kind of obvious shite that folks like Steve Goddard do not comprehend. They truly believe the "raw data" has the true climate signal.
Let me ask you this Jim - if I take a temperature measurement in the same place and time - say 3 pm - every day for 20 years - and then I decide to change the time of measurement from 3 pm to 3 am - does that mean the Earth has cooled? If I look at the "raw" data from such a weather station, it would seem as if the average temperatures dropped by like 10 or 20 or 30 degrees almost instantly! This is the kind of obvious shite that folks like Steve Goddard do not comprehend. They truly believe the "raw data" has the true climate signal.
This post was edited on 12/5/14 at 9:38 am
Posted on 12/5/14 at 9:52 am to SpidermanTUba
quote:
They truly believe the "raw data" has the true climate signal.
Yep...I get what you are saying. 20 years worth of data out of 4.5 billion years is just silly. Right?
Posted on 12/5/14 at 9:53 am to Jim Ignatowski
I am about as hardcore a AGW skeptic as there is on this board, but, man, that link reads like it came straight from this guy's publicist.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News