Started By
Message

Ghislaine Maxwell's case details are too sensational and impure for public, judge says

Posted on 3/20/21 at 12:19 pm
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
108398 posts
Posted on 3/20/21 at 12:19 pm
New York Post

quote:

A federal judge on Thursday agreed with Ghislaine Maxwell’s request to keep certain details in the criminal case against her secret — finding that information would be too “sensational and impure” to reveal to the public.

US District Judge Alison J. Nathan issued a ruling on redactions that Maxwell had asked for regarding transcripts the government filed under seal last month.

“Those portions of the transcript, which were redacted in the civil matter, concern privacy interests and their disclosure would merely serve to cater to a ‘craving for that which is sensational and impure,’” Nathan wrote in the order.

The judge also granted redactions that prosecutors made when filing the transcript. Prosecutors had argued the redactions were necessary to “protect the integrity” of the investigation into Maxwell and to protect the privacy of third parties.


And the judge is a fricking woman too. I'm guessing she woke up to this yesterday.


Posted by TerryDawg03
The Deep South
Member since Dec 2012
15714 posts
Posted on 3/20/21 at 12:34 pm to
Screw this. The public deserves to know.
Posted by LookSquirrel
Member since Oct 2019
5911 posts
Posted on 3/20/21 at 12:49 pm to
Who in the actual frick are these “entities “ that are “craving “ the sensational and IMPURE?
IMPURE? In today’s world?
What the hell does that even mean?
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 3/20/21 at 1:00 pm to
same public who got served wet arse pussy and scissoring on network TV this week?
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
29166 posts
Posted on 3/20/21 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

IMPURE? In today’s world?
What the hell does that even mean?



WAP at the Grammys but this is too much
Posted by bird35
Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
12177 posts
Posted on 3/20/21 at 1:48 pm to
I have learned when the FBI and CIA tells a judge to rule in a certain way it does not matter the facts of the case or what the law says or what the Constitution says.


Posted by CamdenTiger
Member since Aug 2009
62437 posts
Posted on 3/20/21 at 1:49 pm to
The public has seen much worse on basic Tv, I guarantee. This is a cover-up, at some level
Posted by BeNotDeceivedGal6_7
Member since May 2019
7039 posts
Posted on 3/20/21 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

their disclosure would merely serve to cater to a ‘craving for that which is sensational and impure,’”


There are standards of what can be put out for public consumption, okay!!









Posted by elcid
Band Camp
Member since Mar 2007
3036 posts
Posted on 3/20/21 at 2:07 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/20/21 at 2:08 pm
Posted by BiteMe2020
Texas
Member since Nov 2020
7284 posts
Posted on 3/20/21 at 2:10 pm to
Does she think putting aluminum foil around her coochie will keep it from going bad?

Posted by BeNotDeceivedGal6_7
Member since May 2019
7039 posts
Posted on 3/20/21 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

Does she think putting aluminum foil around her coochie will keep it from going bad?


Ever hear of a tinfoil hat? Maybe she knows something the rest of us don't?
Posted by HonoraryCoonass
Member since Jan 2005
18073 posts
Posted on 3/20/21 at 2:19 pm to
If the American public can handle the details if the Dahmer case, they can handle this.
Posted by greygoose
Member since Aug 2013
11458 posts
Posted on 3/20/21 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

Who in the actual frick are these “entities “ that are “craving “ the sensational and IMPURE?
IMPURE? In today’s world?
What the hell does that even mean?


Ummmmm.....two "ladies" just performed a song, in Prime Time TV, nation wide, LIVE, last Sunday night entitled "WAP" (wet arse pussy).

Posted by mauser
Orange Beach
Member since Nov 2008
21578 posts
Posted on 3/20/21 at 2:28 pm to
The only thing that makes sense other than a cover up for politicians and celebrities is that the material involves minors and the judge and prosecutors don’t want to feed the sick appetites of perverts.
Posted by CedarChest
South of Mejico
Member since Jun 2020
2782 posts
Posted on 3/20/21 at 2:52 pm to
I'm far from a prude; that being said, the macabre doesn't titillate this corner of the room. It merely revulses. Just one more reason to put these pieces of vile human trash in a submarine that never surfaces.
This post was edited on 3/20/21 at 2:53 pm
Posted by PewPewBlue
Merica
Member since Jan 2021
491 posts
Posted on 3/20/21 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

IMPURE?
IMPURE? In today’s world?
What the hell does that even mean?


It means the details could hurt or incriminate important people.

Move along, peasant...
Posted by PaperTiger
Ruston, LA
Member since Feb 2015
22941 posts
Posted on 3/20/21 at 2:59 pm to
Jeffrey Dahmer used to eat gay dudes brains...but the public still knew about it.
Posted by BiteMe2020
Texas
Member since Nov 2020
7284 posts
Posted on 3/20/21 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

Who in the actual frick are these “entities “ that are “craving “ the sensational and IMPURE?
IMPURE? In today’s world?
What the hell does that even mean?


It means the same thing it did in 1776, there's just more of it in the public view now.
Posted by ZZTIGERS
Member since Dec 2007
17080 posts
Posted on 3/20/21 at 3:06 pm to
quote:

A federal judge on Thursday agreed with Ghislaine Maxwell’s request to keep certain details in the criminal case against her secret — finding that information would be too “sensational and impure” to reveal to the public.

Dude, l lived through the Curley Hallman & Trent Johnson years @ LSU. I think I’ll be alright.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram