- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 6/2/24 at 6:45 pm to RaoulDuke504
It’s an amazing admission. How bad is the interview, that it’s a national security concern?
Posted on 6/2/24 at 6:53 pm to kilo
quote:
Typical Leftist response. The hypocrisy on the heels of your other posts after DJT verdict is inescapable.
fricking clown.
What makes that response leftist? (or political in any way)
The special prosecutor (Robert Hur) ended his investigation, gave his final report and left the Justice Department (which he only came back to in order to run the investigation.
He was a Trump appointee that left when Trump did. He came back for this investigation only.
In the Mueller investigation, Mueller published Trump's written response to questions as part of his final report (Trump refused an interview but agreed to answer questions in writing).
Hur didn't publish a written transcript of Biden's interview in his final report. The Mueller report clearly shows he could have if he had wanted to.
None of that is opinion or political. It's simply the facts of the case. The special counsel had the ability to publish the interview. He decided not to. He can't do anything more about it now because that investigation is officially over and he's no longer employed as a special counsel.
Posted on 6/2/24 at 9:23 pm to DawginSC
quote:
DawginSC
This moron is in every thread presenting with TDS and cancer and knighting for Biden.
Posted on 6/2/24 at 9:59 pm to RaoulDuke504
At this point in time they're just having a blast making fun of the GOP
Posted on 6/2/24 at 10:04 pm to antibarner
quote:
I repeat, and this cannot be refuted. The American People have a RIGHT TO KNOW if the President is competent, or not. Congress has a right to this material, to determine if Joe Biden is competent, and if there was a coverup by the Justice Department.
They literally have the transcript.
That is the material.
I get they want the audio in order to try to manipulate it into a campaign ad, but the plain truth is that they have the transcript of the interview. They have no oversight reason to need more.
And that's their only power to demand information from the executive branch. For oversight.
This post was edited on 6/2/24 at 10:05 pm
Posted on 6/2/24 at 10:06 pm to DawginSC
If they have the total transcript then it seems odd to force it into a top secret scif.
Why?
Why?
Posted on 6/2/24 at 10:12 pm to DawginSC
You’re a total and complete sheep
The American people have a right to know how a president sounds during an interview
The American people have a right to know how a president sounds during an interview
Posted on 6/2/24 at 10:14 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Of course thing like word emphasis and voice inflection are very important.
It's why chiefs like this guy are Happy it's in a scif.
It's why chiefs like this guy are Happy it's in a scif.
Posted on 6/2/24 at 10:16 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
The American people have a right to know how a president sounds during an interview
There are plenty of Biden interviews that the public can look at.
If you're talking about during a special prosecutor interview, if that's true then where is the audio of special prosecutor interviews of Reagan for the Iran Contra investigation, Clinton in the Ken Starr special prosecution or Trump in the Mueller investigation?
Or is this one different in some way?
Posted on 6/2/24 at 10:18 pm to DawginSC
Why deflect?
Are those videos ina scif?
Are those videos ina scif?
Posted on 6/2/24 at 10:25 pm to DawginSC
Hey sheep, try to grasp what the Biden Justice dept is trying to set as the standard going forward.
They are trying to argue that “deepfakes” mean the release of audio records is too risky for a White House. This is going to be used by future WHs to destroy congressional and public access to records.
The only reason the WH doesn’t want the audio released is because it’s a bad look for Biden. Period.
They are trying to argue that “deepfakes” mean the release of audio records is too risky for a White House. This is going to be used by future WHs to destroy congressional and public access to records.
The only reason the WH doesn’t want the audio released is because it’s a bad look for Biden. Period.
Posted on 6/2/24 at 10:26 pm to Jbird
Garland did this to keep people from seeing what the Special Prosecutor saw. Joe Biden is incompetent. He should be removed from office and AG Partisan Pansy is protecting him.
Congress has a right to know whether the President is competent. Those interviews are public record. Either Garland gives them up, or Congress sends the Sergeant at Arms for Garland.
Congress has a right to know whether the President is competent. Those interviews are public record. Either Garland gives them up, or Congress sends the Sergeant at Arms for Garland.
This post was edited on 6/2/24 at 10:28 pm
Posted on 6/2/24 at 11:23 pm to BobBoucher
quote:
Let him hide his dementia until it’s too late for them to swap out Biden.
Except for his DNC cheerleaders, that ship has sailed.
Posted on 6/2/24 at 11:45 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
Hey sheep, try to grasp what the Biden Justice dept is trying to set as the standard going forward.
But it's already the standard.
We literally don't have access to the audio of presidential interviews by special prosecutors in any of the past cases either. Just transcripts.
Why exactly should the standard change now?
quote:
The only reason the WH doesn’t want the audio released is because it’s a bad look for Biden. Period.
I'm sure this is true. I'm sure there are some bad looks for Reagan in his Iran-Contra interviews, I'm sure there are some bad looks for Clinton in his Ken Starr interviews. I'm sure if Trump had agreed to be interviewed rather than only allowing a written deposition, there would have been some bad moments for him as well.
Presidents have been interviewed by special prosecutors going back to Nixon. None of the audio recordings of those interviews have ever been released. Only transcripts. I'm sure a big part of that is to get honest testimony rather than having campaign speech like responses to questions. You're going to behave differently in public hearings because you know it's a performance.these things are done privately to avoid that crap.
Why should that change now?
Posted on 6/3/24 at 5:19 am to DawginSC
WHY? Because Congress sent a subpoena for them. For a legitimate reason. Special Counsel Hur declined to prosecute for some concerning reasons. There are questions over the competency of the President that must be answered. If he is not competent to face a jury, he cannot occupy the office he now holds. You know this and should stop gaslighting.
It is NOT Merrick Garland's job to protect the President's re election prospects or anything else, it is his job to obey the law. Which time and again on his watch he has not. He is likely the most partisan AG we have had in many a year.
Democrats and their acolytes such as yourself love to bleat about no one being above the law. AG Limpwrist certainly is not,. and I for one hope the House Sergeant at Arms and the Capitol Police cuff and stuff the bastard.
It is NOT Merrick Garland's job to protect the President's re election prospects or anything else, it is his job to obey the law. Which time and again on his watch he has not. He is likely the most partisan AG we have had in many a year.
Democrats and their acolytes such as yourself love to bleat about no one being above the law. AG Limpwrist certainly is not,. and I for one hope the House Sergeant at Arms and the Capitol Police cuff and stuff the bastard.
Posted on 6/3/24 at 5:19 am to DawginSC
Indeed why the scif?
This post was edited on 6/3/24 at 5:27 am
Posted on 6/3/24 at 5:28 am to RaoulDuke504
Trump can declassify it after the election. Then put it out for all to see. Then when libtards start their civil disobedience to protest his election, they can be smacked down quickly and thoroughly.
Posted on 6/3/24 at 5:34 am to RaoulDuke504
Safely tucked away in his garage.
Posted on 6/3/24 at 5:42 am to DawginSC
quote:
Why exactly should the standard change now?
Because none of the other Presidents you mentioned were given a pass from prosecution because prosecutors felt their mental state was so deteriorated that defense attorneys could use that as a valid defense.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News