- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Ga SOS files Amicus Brief Attempting to Prevent Independent Audit that Judge has allowed
Posted on 4/10/21 at 3:14 pm
Posted on 4/10/21 at 3:14 pm
Georgia’s creepy Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger had petitioned the court to request that the state of Georgia not have to provide paper ballots in an audit requested and awarded by the court.
Yesterday, creative destruction media, listed seven instances in Raffensperger’s letter that are just plain false:
The brief falsely claims that Petitioners did not articulate legal justification to unseal the ballots while it totally ignores the most important point of relevant law that any court can unseal ballots for any reason under O.C.G.A. 21-2-500. If the controversies surrounding the Nov 3rd 2020 election do not justify reasons to unseal the ballots then what would?
The brief falsely portrays the lawsuit as only Open Records Request Act claims when in reality, most are Equal Protection and Due Process claims that justify unsealing of the ballots as part of discovery for evidence to adjudicate the claims;
The brief restates the off repeated false claims that there are overwhelming security and privacy issues involving the ballots. The ballots contain no voter identifiable information and will remain in the custody of Fulton Co. during the inspection according to the most recently filed inspection plan;
The brief falsely implies that recently signed Act 9 of the Georgia General Assembly, passed as SB202, prevents ballots from being unsealed. No such language exists as any reader can see by reviewing the bill language or our analysis of it in the sixth installment of our Georgia Election Integrity series. A recent Raffensperger press release claimed he “worked with the Georgia legislature to make sure ballot images could be made available to the public for review” when in reality, his Elections Director Chris Harvey and legal counsel Ryan Germany misled county elections directors in Emails by falsely claiming the AG office had issued an opinion that ballot images could not be made public;
The brief falsely attempts to use a 2007 Smith V. Dekalb case as precedent for ballot images when that case referenced the old DRE voting system that never produced paper ballot images.
The brief falsely states that lawsuit contains “baseless” claims when the claims are actually based on four sworn affidavits from seasoned poll managers stating they handled counterfeit ballots during the November 14th and 15th hand count audit
The brief falsely states that there was no unlawful activity at the State Farm Area when mail-in ballots were processed during the night of November 3rd and 4th 2020. The video shows a curved room that impaired monitor visibility, ballots being hidden under skirted tables, the same ballots being scanned more than once and scanning re-initiated after an announcement was made that scanning would stop for the night according to two sworn affidavits. All of these activities and conditions are violations of Georgia laws contrary to voting system implementation manager Gabriel Sterling who claimed it was “normal ballot processing” (O.C.G.A. 21-2-406, 21-2-483(b) 2-2-492, 21-2-493)
LINK
Yesterday, creative destruction media, listed seven instances in Raffensperger’s letter that are just plain false:
The brief falsely claims that Petitioners did not articulate legal justification to unseal the ballots while it totally ignores the most important point of relevant law that any court can unseal ballots for any reason under O.C.G.A. 21-2-500. If the controversies surrounding the Nov 3rd 2020 election do not justify reasons to unseal the ballots then what would?
The brief falsely portrays the lawsuit as only Open Records Request Act claims when in reality, most are Equal Protection and Due Process claims that justify unsealing of the ballots as part of discovery for evidence to adjudicate the claims;
The brief restates the off repeated false claims that there are overwhelming security and privacy issues involving the ballots. The ballots contain no voter identifiable information and will remain in the custody of Fulton Co. during the inspection according to the most recently filed inspection plan;
The brief falsely implies that recently signed Act 9 of the Georgia General Assembly, passed as SB202, prevents ballots from being unsealed. No such language exists as any reader can see by reviewing the bill language or our analysis of it in the sixth installment of our Georgia Election Integrity series. A recent Raffensperger press release claimed he “worked with the Georgia legislature to make sure ballot images could be made available to the public for review” when in reality, his Elections Director Chris Harvey and legal counsel Ryan Germany misled county elections directors in Emails by falsely claiming the AG office had issued an opinion that ballot images could not be made public;
The brief falsely attempts to use a 2007 Smith V. Dekalb case as precedent for ballot images when that case referenced the old DRE voting system that never produced paper ballot images.
The brief falsely states that lawsuit contains “baseless” claims when the claims are actually based on four sworn affidavits from seasoned poll managers stating they handled counterfeit ballots during the November 14th and 15th hand count audit
The brief falsely states that there was no unlawful activity at the State Farm Area when mail-in ballots were processed during the night of November 3rd and 4th 2020. The video shows a curved room that impaired monitor visibility, ballots being hidden under skirted tables, the same ballots being scanned more than once and scanning re-initiated after an announcement was made that scanning would stop for the night according to two sworn affidavits. All of these activities and conditions are violations of Georgia laws contrary to voting system implementation manager Gabriel Sterling who claimed it was “normal ballot processing” (O.C.G.A. 21-2-406, 21-2-483(b) 2-2-492, 21-2-493)
LINK
Posted on 4/10/21 at 3:18 pm to Jjdoc
Biden is the most popular President ever. He won easily. Why would anyone care about any audit of the election that shows overwhelming support for Biden.
This post was edited on 4/11/21 at 6:52 pm
Posted on 4/10/21 at 3:19 pm to Jjdoc
Is there any legitimate reason to oppose an audit?
Posted on 4/10/21 at 3:19 pm to Jjdoc
Ratfricker is worse than a Democrat.
He’s one of the worst RINOs I’ve ever witnessed.
He’s one of the worst RINOs I’ve ever witnessed.
Posted on 4/10/21 at 3:24 pm to Jjdoc
Georgia spent billions over a flag design issue. I think t can fork up a few million out of the hope scholarship slush fund to cover this.
Posted on 4/10/21 at 3:28 pm to Jjdoc
What are they trying to hide?
Posted on 4/10/21 at 3:28 pm to LuckyTiger
quote:
Ratfricker is worse than a Democrat.
He’s one of the worst RINOs I’ve ever witnessed.
He’s a traitor and should meet a traitor’s fate.
Posted on 4/10/21 at 3:30 pm to Jjdoc
“Now Brad this is your new roommate Bubba. Try to get along with Bubba, cause I just know Bubba’s gonna like you”.
Posted on 4/10/21 at 3:31 pm to coolpapaboze
quote:
Is there any legitimate reason to oppose an audit?
Yes, if you are afraid they are going to find something
Posted on 4/10/21 at 3:36 pm to coolpapaboze
quote:
Is there any legitimate reason to oppose an audit?
The opposition to audits is the only evidence of fraud that persuades me. More fraud than normal, that is.
Posted on 4/10/21 at 3:39 pm to HeadSlash
quote:
What are they trying to hide?
An audit of the process???
Posted on 4/10/21 at 4:00 pm to Jjdoc
Who has the final say in this?
Posted on 4/10/21 at 4:06 pm to Jjdoc
Headline: Raffensperger Issues Statement Regarding Motion to File Amicus Brief in Response to Request to Unseal Paper Ballots
LINK
quote:
The Office of the Secretary of State has filed with the Superior Court of Fulton County, Georgia, a motion to file an Amicus Brief in response to the petitioner’s (Garland Favorito) motion to unseal paper ballots and compel production of ballots.
quote:
Unfortunately, some in the media are mischaracterizing our motion, insinuating that we are preventing an audit, which is false. The paper ballots have been sealed, and recent updates to the Georgia Open Records Act allow for the public disclosure for ballot images only (not ballots). In fact, we worked with the Georgia legislature to make sure ballot images could be made available for review. Nonetheless, it is our responsibility to protect the security and confidentiality of the ballots according to the requirements of the Georgia Elections Code.
quote:
We welcome the public disclosure of these ballot images, and simply request that the judge set up a process to prevent any party from creating and spreading false information.”
LINK
Posted on 4/10/21 at 4:08 pm to Jjdoc
frick that fraud. He can be the first domino to fall.
Posted on 4/10/21 at 4:16 pm to texridder
quote:
the Georgia Open Records Act allow for the public disclosure for ballot images only (not ballots)
Before or after adjudication?
Posted on 4/10/21 at 4:26 pm to LuckyTiger
quote:
Ratfricker is worse than a Democrat.
He’s one of the worst RINOs I’ve ever witnessed.
Hes a Chinese agent
Posted on 4/10/21 at 4:46 pm to loogaroo
quote:
Before or after adjudication?
Good question.
I'm not sure of the Georgia procedure on retaining adjudicated original ballots. Obviously, could change the validity of Raffensperger's statement.
Posted on 4/10/21 at 5:10 pm to Jjdoc
The number of similar instances in different states indicates that Trump won. Yuuuugely.
Posted on 4/10/21 at 5:12 pm to Jjdoc
It's weird that these motherfrickers go out of their way to prevent any form of transparency.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News