- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 7/14/21 at 1:23 pm to CelticDog
Your mother does.
Posted on 7/14/21 at 1:26 pm to CelticDog
Yes election night was unsupervised, glad to see you are coming around to the right side
Posted on 7/14/21 at 1:28 pm to CelticDog
quote:
no one believes this unsupervised nonsense.
What is going unsupervised?? And who should be in control of the process instead??
btw - who supervised the early morning ballot-counting while the counting was 'halted for the night?' so they could fix the water main break??????
Posted on 7/14/21 at 1:38 pm to ChineseBandit58
Please to many truths in one post for one dog to handle
Posted on 7/14/21 at 1:53 pm to ChineseBandit58
quote:
btw - who supervised the early morning ballot-counting while the counting was 'halted for the night?' so they could fix the water main break??????
They were merely "relocating" ballots to protect them from water damage. Sheesh man.
Posted on 7/14/21 at 1:58 pm to CelticDog
quote:
no one believes this unsupervised nonsense.
I'm happy to provide explicit details where you can file your invective.
Stay on topic. Please explain ANYTHING that is being reported. (And can be seen for yourself, btw).
Posted on 7/14/21 at 2:04 pm to ChineseBandit58
quote:
btw - who supervised the early morning ballot-counting while the counting was 'halted for the night?' so they could fix the water main break??????
FOIA requests reveal pipe break was resolved within 2 hours.
A public records request led to the exposure of a text message by Atlanta Hawks vice president of facilities Geoffrey Stiles claiming the story was exaggerated:
So why did Fulton Co. Elections use the pipe story as cover to explain why the ballots needed to be moved, much less send home poll watchers at 10:30 pm (30 mins after AZ polls closed, and 27 mins after Fox News inexplicably called AZ for Biden), only to resume UNSUPERVISED at 1:30am with no accountability.
quote:
no one believes this unsupervised nonsense.
Indeed.
Posted on 7/14/21 at 2:13 pm to VoxDawg
Posted on 7/14/21 at 2:28 pm to VoxDawg
What boggles me is that no matter who you voted for...all legal voters SHOULD want to know if these elections are legit. These fricking losers around here only care about one thing...”trump losing”...and they are willing to burn with the country. This is so much fricking more than one man winning or losing. It’s sad. Really sad.
Posted on 7/14/21 at 2:30 pm to Blitzed
quote:
What boggles me is that no matter who you voted for...all legal voters SHOULD want to know if these elections are legit. These fricking losers around here only care about one thing...”trump losing”...and they are willing to burn with the country. This is so much fricking more than one man winning or losing. It’s sad. Really sad.
It's Thermonuclear TDS.
On steroids.
With AIDS.
Posted on 7/14/21 at 3:17 pm to VoxDawg
This camera footage shot was just posted by the AZAudits.org guy, with commentary from an anon on GA.win. I compiled it into a single image: (GrainOSalt.com)
Close-up of top right quadrant:
Close-up of top right quadrant:
This post was edited on 7/14/21 at 3:20 pm
Posted on 7/14/21 at 3:44 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
David Cross calling him out.
BTW, notice Cross saying they didn't begin examining the ballot images until July 9.
All this is what they've dug up in 5 days.
Not only that they had to write software from scratch that would examine all the scanned in ballots. In fact they just wrote new software that is scanning each ballot and taking each part of every ballot and loading it into a database. This database will be able to look for repeating signatures of ballots. They are still loading the database and its a ton of data. I believe they said it will take another 36 hours before the DB is loaded. I expect when that is done we will be able to discover a lot more about all these ballots then we even know now. They weren't banking on all this info getting out where anyone would be able to analyze the ballots and it very well could be their downfall in GA.
Posted on 7/14/21 at 3:46 pm to UAinSOUTHAL
Here's a better version of Trump's GA statement:
Posted on 7/14/21 at 3:54 pm to VoxDawg
I fully believe now if we get a full forensic audit of the results in GA that not only will it show that Trump won but that both senate races were won by republicans also.
I know there isn't a procedure in the constitution for replacing Biden per se but I do believe there is one for replacing Senators or having them recalled by the state. Even if Trump could not be reinstated getting 2 senate seats back would be huge and put the brakes on Bidens administration.
I know there isn't a procedure in the constitution for replacing Biden per se but I do believe there is one for replacing Senators or having them recalled by the state. Even if Trump could not be reinstated getting 2 senate seats back would be huge and put the brakes on Bidens administration.
Posted on 7/14/21 at 3:56 pm to Dday63
When folks first start posting to Poli, I usually give them the benefit of doubt as being able to conduct adult discourse if they post something I disagree with. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. When it doesn't, there's simply no reason to continue trying to discuss on a level the other party has shown themselves as unable/unwilling to participate in.
Soooooo...
That's your response? BWAAAAAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAAHAAAHAAHAAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAA-
*gasp!*
HAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAA!!!
I mention that there's video showing hard evidence of repeated voter fraud and you respond with a pathetic informal logical fallacy like credentialism? Seriously? That's your rebuttal??
Are you drunk, stoned or just fricking stupid? That's not a slight, it's a legitimate question because only someone suffering from one of those maladies would think it's worth the time and the minute effort it took to post it.
First off, where did you get your degree in Forensic Ballot Auditing? Don't bother to answer, it's a rhetorical question (definition provided, you're welcome) because not only is there not only no such degree, there's not even a course for that. By your own logic you aren't even qualified to ask the question.
It's not everyday I see someone shite on their own argument so blatantly. Thank you for making my day.
Secondly, because there is no degree program, vo-tech or introductory course for Forensic Ballot Auditing it's the height of immaturity and ignorance to even attempt to argue credentialism. No one needs a non-existent degree to watch a video showing raw data, I mean... unless you're suggesting people should have degrees in Broadcasting just to watch a video. Is that what you're suggesting?
Moving on...
Those are the only two choices because why in the bleeding shite would they put up the data for the incorrect vote count but not for the correct one? If they have a choice to put up only one, it's fricking self-evident they would put their finalized one up. Thus, there is no "false dichotomy".
It states how many were double-counted in the State's hand recount, not the VoterGA count. Those are showing two different things. You would see this if you weren't so busy looking for reasons to excuse this all away.
The same scanner showing up as double-scanning multiple, non-immediately successive times isn't a "mistake", it's a pattern of behavior. It's either inept or purposely fraudulent.
The "appropriate changes" are for prosecutions with serious penalties to insure future counters don't attempt the same thing. Anything less than that invites this to happen again, or at least for those wanting to do this to work harder at hiding their work.
Soooooo...
quote:quote:
I watched a snippet of a video from the press conference last night,
That certainly qualifies you as an expert on this, then.
That's your response? BWAAAAAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAAHAAAHAAHAAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAA-
*gasp!*
HAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAA!!!
I mention that there's video showing hard evidence of repeated voter fraud and you respond with a pathetic informal logical fallacy like credentialism? Seriously? That's your rebuttal??
Are you drunk, stoned or just fricking stupid? That's not a slight, it's a legitimate question because only someone suffering from one of those maladies would think it's worth the time and the minute effort it took to post it.
First off, where did you get your degree in Forensic Ballot Auditing? Don't bother to answer, it's a rhetorical question (definition provided, you're welcome) because not only is there not only no such degree, there's not even a course for that. By your own logic you aren't even qualified to ask the question.
It's not everyday I see someone shite on their own argument so blatantly. Thank you for making my day.
Secondly, because there is no degree program, vo-tech or introductory course for Forensic Ballot Auditing it's the height of immaturity and ignorance to even attempt to argue credentialism. No one needs a non-existent degree to watch a video showing raw data, I mean... unless you're suggesting people should have degrees in Broadcasting just to watch a video. Is that what you're suggesting?
Moving on...
quote:quote:
The story you linked stated the miscounts were addressed in the recount. So either Georgia never updated their records (thus allowing people to download known bad data) or yesterday's press conference was of the votes after the recount.
False dichotomy. We don't have enough information yet to narrow the possibilities down to these two choices. I don't think it would be proper for the State to alter the original images even if mistakes were made, but maybe we will learn more.
Those are the only two choices because why in the bleeding shite would they put up the data for the incorrect vote count but not for the correct one? If they have a choice to put up only one, it's fricking self-evident they would put their finalized one up. Thus, there is no "false dichotomy".
quote:quote:
The story also glosses over the high percentage of how many votes were counted more than once
The article states exactly how many votes were double counted.
It states how many were double-counted in the State's hand recount, not the VoterGA count. Those are showing two different things. You would see this if you weren't so busy looking for reasons to excuse this all away.
quote:quote:
think playing this all off as "sloppy" is incredibly dangerous and doing so flies completely in the face of the belief in the "sanctity of the vote". As more issues crop up, passing this off as anything less than intentional fraud becomes ever more dangerous and opens the door for excusing future similar issues.
If it is true that the mistake was caught and corrected, then it is not particularly dangerous at all.
The same scanner showing up as double-scanning multiple, non-immediately successive times isn't a "mistake", it's a pattern of behavior. It's either inept or purposely fraudulent.
quote:
Make appropriate changes to minimize future mistakes and move on.
The "appropriate changes" are for prosecutions with serious penalties to insure future counters don't attempt the same thing. Anything less than that invites this to happen again, or at least for those wanting to do this to work harder at hiding their work.
Posted on 7/14/21 at 4:02 pm to UAinSOUTHAL
quote:
I know there isn't a procedure in the constitution for replacing Biden per se but I do believe there is one for replacing Senators or having them recalled by the state. Even if Trump could not be reinstated getting 2 senate seats back would be huge and put the brakes on Bidens administration.
Impeachment is afforded to duly elected Presidents.
We're looking at willful disregard for our legal process, resulting in a fraudulently-installed Chief Executive. We don't owe that fraud shite.
Posted on 7/14/21 at 4:13 pm to CelticDog
quote:
no one believes this unsupervised nonsense.
Says the least trustworthy poster on this site.
frick off commiedog
Posted on 7/14/21 at 6:09 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
We don't owe that fraud shite.
Correction: We owe him his Miranda rights.
Posted on 7/14/21 at 8:24 pm to VoxDawg
Just saw a tweet by @GABallots in the last hour where they have matched batches that were shuffled and not reversed. This is a new trend and they keep find more and more stuff. Have a feeling this is going to get a lot bigger.
Page 16 of 20
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News