- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 7/13/21 at 10:41 pm to Seldom Seen
Posted on 7/14/21 at 6:06 am to the808bass
quote:
Additionally, they were in violation of election policy as they counted ballots without any observers present.
False. There is no requirement that observers be present during counting.
The GBI fully investigated this. The table was set up and the ballots placed there because everyone thought they were going home for the night. The ballots in those boxes had been verified with observers present. The poll workers got the call to keep counting, so they went back to work.
Anyone still calling those boxes "suitcases" just doesn't want to face reality.
Posted on 7/14/21 at 6:09 am to the808bass
Fulton County responds.
LINK
AJC report says the ballots were initially double counted, but mistake was caught and the duplicate votes were not part of final tally. Sloppy, but not fraudulent.
LINK
AJC report says the ballots were initially double counted, but mistake was caught and the duplicate votes were not part of final tally. Sloppy, but not fraudulent.
Posted on 7/14/21 at 6:23 am to Dday63
quote:
Anyone still calling those boxes "suitcases" just doesn't want to face reality.
You might want to tell that to the 20 year Fulton Co Elections employee who testified before the General Assembly committee hearing, then. When she signed her affidavit, it was that she was responsible for printing and securing test ballots, which were stored "in suitcases", but those several thousand test ballots disappeared the day before election day.
This post was edited on 7/14/21 at 7:21 am
Posted on 7/14/21 at 7:05 am to Dday63
quote:
AJC report says the ballots were initially double counted, but mistake was caught and the duplicate votes were not part of final tally. Sloppy, but not fraudulent.
The story you linked stated the miscounts were addressed in the recount. So either Georgia never updated their records (thus allowing people to download known bad data) or yesterday's press conference was of the votes after the recount. Both show, at least, incredible and ongoing ineptitude.
The story also glosses over the high percentage of how many votes were counted more than once as well as did not even touch on the falsified tally sheet (writing that the entire batch went to one candidate when it clearly did not is definitively fraudulent).
I watched a snippet of a video from the press conference last night, one thing I noticed that wasn't stated during that video is that a lot of the examples they showed seemed to come from the same scanner.
I think playing this all off as "sloppy" is incredibly dangerous and doing so flies completely in the face of the belief in the "sanctity of the vote". As more issues crop up, passing this off as anything less than intentional fraud becomes ever more dangerous and opens the door for excusing future similar issues.
Posted on 7/14/21 at 7:06 am to Bard
Dday is just fricking loser liar.
Posted on 7/14/21 at 7:12 am to the808bass
Thanks, I guess. All I did was link Fulton County's response. I didn't write the article.
Posted on 7/14/21 at 7:12 am to Dday63
quote:
False. There is no requirement that observers be present during counting.
False. Georgia law requires election duties be performed “in public.”
quote:
• Nonpartisan observers and the public may observe elections as long as they are not violating election law. All persons except poll watchers, poll workers, voters and voters’ children must stay outside the enclosed space during voting (Code of Georgia § 21-2-413 (f)).
• Partisan observers are permitted within the enclosed space for the purpose of observing the conduct of the election and the counting and recording of votes (Code of Georgia §21-2-408(d)).
• Officials engaged in the conducting of elections shall perform their duties in public (Code of Georgia § 21-2-406).
Here’s your “L.”
Posted on 7/14/21 at 7:12 am to Dday63
Linking articles from a leftist propaganda rag is worthless.
If you opened your eyes you'd realize that never would the AJC publish an article against the Democratic party's intentions.
If you opened your eyes you'd realize that never would the AJC publish an article against the Democratic party's intentions.
Posted on 7/14/21 at 7:12 am to Dday63
frick off, liar.
Posted on 7/14/21 at 7:19 am to Dday63
quote:
All I did was link Fulton County's response
Do you lack self awareness to such an extent that you do not recognize the below is your OPINION.
quote:
Sloppy, but not fraudulent.
Posted on 7/14/21 at 7:20 am to Bard
quote:
The story you linked stated the miscounts were addressed in the recount. So either Georgia never updated their records (thus allowing people to download known bad data) or yesterday's press conference was of the votes after the recount.
False dichotomy. We don't have enough information yet to narrow the possibilities down to these two choices. I don't think it would be proper for the State to alter the original images even if mistakes were made, but maybe we will learn more.
quote:
The story also glosses over the high percentage of how many votes were counted more than once
The article states exactly how many votes were double counted.
quote:
I watched a snippet of a video from the press conference last night,
That certainly qualifies you as an expert on this, then.
quote:
think playing this all off as "sloppy" is incredibly dangerous and doing so flies completely in the face of the belief in the "sanctity of the vote". As more issues crop up, passing this off as anything less than intentional fraud becomes ever more dangerous and opens the door for excusing future similar issues.
If it is true that the mistake was caught and corrected, then it is not particularly dangerous at all. In fact, that would be further proof the system can be trusted. Make appropriate changes to minimize future mistakes and move on.
Posted on 7/14/21 at 7:22 am to Dday63
quote:
Fulton County's response
Posted on 7/14/21 at 7:23 am to Dday63
quote:
Sloppy, but not fraudulent.
Well, frick me sideways, the AJC's gotten to the bottom of it.
Pack it in, boys!
quote:
mistake was caught and the duplicate votes were not part of final tally.
No, because the clearly and statistically-impossible phony tallies of the yellow "audit" sheets where every vote in the stack was said to have been for Biden replaced them.
Posted on 7/14/21 at 7:24 am to Dday63
quote:
If it is true that the mistake was caught and corrected, then it is not particularly dangerous at all. In fact, that would be further proof the system can be trusted.
Posted on 7/14/21 at 7:25 am to Bard
quote:
a lot of the examples they showed seemed to come from the same scanner.
Which would indicate deliberate effort, if you ask me. Now, was that deliberate effort by one person, or a team of people? That's why we investigate, but it would seem to me, it's easier to buy off Ruby Freeman and her immediate Dindu family than it is an entire precinct(s) worth of poll workers.
Posted on 7/14/21 at 7:35 am to Dday63
quote:
They weren't suitcases, and they were ballots that had been verified and were ready for counting. That isn't cheating.
Here's what you guys keep relying on. You believe there was fraud, and so you take any irregularity you see and assume it proves fraud. It was weird that Fulton County intended to stop counting ballots at 10:30 p.m., and then someone changed the plan. It was too bad that they sent poll watchers home, but of course the security cameras were still rolling. At worst, that scenario created an opportunity for fraud, but that doesn't mean fraud occurred.
If there was fraud, I hope it is proven. I am curious about these duplicate ballots. But these ballots have been publicly available for weeks, to anyone willing to spend $250. I find it hard to believe that something so blatant is just now coming out.
This response is generated from stark naivete and msm brainwashing.
Posted on 7/14/21 at 8:01 am to mightyMick
quote:
This response is generated from stark naivete and msm brainwashing.
If it were real news, it would be on CNN. Duh.
Posted on 7/14/21 at 8:08 am to VoxDawg
Page 13 of 20
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News