- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Fulton County admits they did not follow the rules.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 1:00 pm to SallysHuman
Posted on 12/22/25 at 1:00 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
How is something like this even remedied? Yeah, we cheated, so what?
You are jumping to a conclusion that is not in evidence. My guess is that the citizen investigator could have examined other election years and found similar things. If there was cheating it could have been Trump’s team cheating. But PROBABLY it was way worse in 2020 and it was Biden’s team cheating.
1
Posted on 12/22/25 at 1:01 pm to loogaroo
quote:
When Cross presented his findings to the SEB, even more irregularities came to light. “I tried to match it up, the opening and the closing [tapes] together, and I couldn’t find it,” said SEB Vice Chair Janice Johnston. “It’s not there. So, I go back to the report, and I read the report. And the investigator says, we asked for all of the opening and closing tapes, and the county reported back, ‘This is all they have,’ which is woefully incomplete.
So... more than just "missing signatures"?
Posted on 12/22/25 at 1:03 pm to Penrod
quote:
You are jumping to a conclusion that is not in evidence. My guess is that the citizen investigator could have examined other election years and found similar things. If there was cheating it could have been Trump’s team cheating. But PROBABLY it was way worse in 2020 and it was Biden’s team cheating.
If team red cheats, string them up- it ain't team sports.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 1:11 pm to loogaroo
quote:
What about this:
What you quoted has absolutely nothing to do with the hand recount of the paper record.
The daily tabulations for early in person voting were not properly authenticated. But the totals all matched up and were verified in multiple hand recounts.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 1:34 pm to LawTalkingGuy
quote:
The daily tabulations for early in person voting were not properly authenticated. But the totals all matched up and were verified in multiple hand recounts.
How? There's no way to authenticate the numbers. You can hand count the same stack all you want.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 1:35 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
So... more than just "missing signatures"?
It appears so.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 1:44 pm to loogaroo
Well I guess 2020 to 2024 didnt happen......
Lock people up sue them to they are destitute
Full throttle. Some welfare queen that was counting ballots over and over didnt come up with this by themselves.
Lock people up sue them to they are destitute
Full throttle. Some welfare queen that was counting ballots over and over didnt come up with this by themselves.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 1:47 pm to loogaroo
quote:
How? There's no way to authenticate the numbers.
They were authenticated in real time, including hand counts.
Just because some guy is claiming he didn't receive documents via FOIA 5 years later, without his claims even being properly vetted by third parties, doesn't change what happened 5 years ago.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 1:48 pm to loogaroo
They did not follow the rules, and they BROKE the rules, too!
Posted on 12/22/25 at 1:52 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Wasn't that decided in a different election in 2021?
Would it have gone to a runoff if there wasn’t rampant “clerical errors” in Fulton county?
Posted on 12/22/25 at 1:58 pm to Gee Grenouille
quote:
Would it have gone to a runoff if there wasn’t rampant “clerical errors” in Fulton county?
Considering the errors wouldn't change the votes, nothing would have changed if these errors didn't occur.
The only theoretical difference is the formalistic-legal scenario, where they were declared invalid for technicalities, not because the votes were otherwise improper or fraudulent.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 1:59 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Considering the errors wouldn't change the votes, nothing would have changed if these errors didn't occur. The only theoretical difference is the formalistic-legal scenario, where they were declared invalid for technicalities, not because the votes were otherwise improper or fraudulent.
Oh well why didn’t you say so. Why have any voting laws at all?
Posted on 12/22/25 at 2:04 pm to CapnKangaroo
quote:
Oh well why didn’t you say so.
I did, in my first post ITT
quote:
Due to the clerical error, Trump could have won GA. It would not have swung the election, though.
However, this error doesn't indicate the type of fraud oft-referenced in "The Steal"
I just summarized the story/discussion in 2 sentences.
quote:
Why have any voting laws at all?
I'm not sure if this requirement is statutory or could lead to invalidation of the votes. I'm waiting on clarification on that point.
It may just be an avenue to sanction the local clerks and/or election officials.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 2:16 pm to SlowFlowPro
Due to the clerical error, Trump could have won GA. It would not have swung the election, though.
I just summarized the story/discussion in 2 sentences.[/quote]
By this logic the entire NYS case against Trump for mortgage fraud is a waste of time, somehow Letitia didn't think so.
I just summarized the story/discussion in 2 sentences.[/quote]
By this logic the entire NYS case against Trump for mortgage fraud is a waste of time, somehow Letitia didn't think so.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 2:22 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The problem is, the words you quoted are not referencing fraud
Wrong.
The election in Georgia was full of fraud.
You're also applying intent to this issue without evidence. It could be fraud as well.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 2:26 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:
Wrong.
The election in Georgia was full of fraud.
Cool, I said "the words you quoted are not referencing fraud"
Those words
quote:
Due to the clerical error, Trump could have won GA. It would not have swung the election, though.
No fraud referenced, and nothing to compare to the purported fraud elsewhere (or in GA for that matter)
quote:
You're also applying intent
I'm not, but I am giving an analysis on how if this was intentional it would be pure idiocy for the DEMs, b/c they gain nothing and risk a ton.
*ETA: it's clear you don't understand what occurred in this story and are just trying to come in and snipe, and every time you respond you just dig yourself a bigger hole. I would suggest decreasing the ignorance and reading actual reporting on this situation, and not framed echo chamber nonsense.
This post was edited on 12/22/25 at 2:28 pm
Posted on 12/22/25 at 2:29 pm to tadman
quote:
Due to the clerical error, Trump could have won GA. It would not have swung the election, though
Not by itself, but it would have given weight to the allegations made in the other swing states. This could have led to REAL investigations before the electoral college votes were certified.
They knew what they did in 2020. They knew. They just didn’t care. They committed to being part of a coup to overthrow a sitting President.
They probably went along because of political persuasion or pressure. They saw what the Left did to the Trump team and were glad they sided with the Uniparty.
There was no way he’d ever come back and bring the truth to light, right???
Posted on 12/22/25 at 2:32 pm to Turbeauxdog
SFP follows the politician motto- if you repeat a lie long enough, it becomes the truth. He keeps repeating the Uniparty lines from 2020.
It’s quite comical…
It’s quite comical…
Posted on 12/22/25 at 2:33 pm to SlowFlowPro
It's always an innocent error when Dems do it.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 2:34 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I'm not, but I am giving an analysis on how if this was intentional it would be pure idiocy for the DEMs, b/c they gain nothing and risk a ton.
I'm not applying intent but I'm applying intent.
Dude do better
Page 10 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News