- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: FOX reporting Rubio might be a NO on tax bill
Posted on 12/14/17 at 1:18 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Posted on 12/14/17 at 1:18 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Sources tell me Rubio is gonna get his child credit. Marco wants a tax break for himself.
0
Posted on 12/14/17 at 1:19 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Is this bill in danger of going over 1.5 trillion over ten years? A lot of the announced agreements will drive up the cost of the bill
Posted on 12/14/17 at 1:19 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
This is fake news. Last night I made some calls to some policy makers in D.C. and they told me more than likely the CTC will be increased beyond the $2000 in the Senate bill and additionally be partially refundable against the payroll tax. Marco has always stated these were his stipulations and by all accounts they will be accommodated with him voting yes.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 1:20 pm to VOLhalla
Remember when Rubio ran for the Senate as a "Tea Pary Conservative"? 
Posted on 12/14/17 at 1:20 pm to OleWarSkuleAlum
Marco living up to his liddle nickname
Posted on 12/14/17 at 1:20 pm to OleWarSkuleAlum
Get that man a new fishing boat with all of the fish finding radar and other stuff along with 2 Mercury 200 outboards.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 1:20 pm to OleWarSkuleAlum
So he will be a yes?
Posted on 12/14/17 at 1:20 pm to VOLhalla
This incentivizes people to work which in the end drives up the GDP. This is a good news story for everyone involved!
Posted on 12/14/17 at 1:21 pm to VOLhalla
quote:That's really the rub. No way Rubio is ultimately going to vote against this, so I imagine he's going to get what he wants on CTC. Since there isn't much wiggle room on further additions to the deficit, everything that costs more has to be paid for by something else. So what is going to have to change to get the CTC further expanded?
Is this bill in danger of going over 1.5 trillion over ten years? A lot of the announced agreements will drive up the cost of the bill
Posted on 12/14/17 at 1:21 pm to VOLhalla
quote:
Is this bill in danger of going over 1.5 trillion over ten years? A lot of the announced agreements will drive up the cost of the bill
It will likely be "paid for" by makign the cuts expire a year earlier, reducing repatriation rates, among other things.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 1:22 pm to Bunyan
Marco will be a yes I can assure you unless something completely falls apart regarding the CTC. Right now there is an agreement to expand the CTC beyond the $2000 in the Senate bill and to make it partially refundable against the payroll tax.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 1:22 pm to Bunyan
Zero percent chance he votes no.
This post was edited on 12/14/17 at 1:23 pm
Posted on 12/14/17 at 1:22 pm to Tiguar
quote:Can't rebuild society with other people's babies!!!1
Posted on 12/14/17 at 1:23 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
In reality the CTC is the best way to cut taxes for hard working American families. Anyone who says otherwise is exactly why the GOP has the stigma they only care for the donor class.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 1:23 pm to Navytiger74
"Little" Marco is owned lock-stock-and-barrel by the richest car dealer in south Florida...and he really likes bubble baths!
Posted on 12/14/17 at 1:23 pm to OleWarSkuleAlum
quote:
Expansion of the CTC
This shite needs to be done away with (I am a parent). Those that breed should not be dependent on a tax credit for doing so. Why can't we have policies that reward good behavior opposed to subsidizing irresponsible behavior? If you cannot afford to care for a child, don't fricking have one. Just lower my tax rate, but don't dole out someone else's money that doesn't qualify because they didn't have a child.
This isn't the worst of the pro child-bearing policies of the U.S., welfare parents should not receive 1 cent more if they choose to reproduce while on government assistance. If they agree to take birth control and refrain from child bearing while on assistance, hell, let's throw another $100 or so at them a month.
This post was edited on 12/14/17 at 1:25 pm
Posted on 12/14/17 at 1:25 pm to AUsteriskPride
quote:
Why can't we have policies that reward good behavior opposed to subsidizing irresponsible behavior?
but we're being outbred by the third world my dude
Posted on 12/14/17 at 1:26 pm to 90proofprofessional
well said!
Posted on 12/14/17 at 1:26 pm to AUsteriskPride
quote:
This shite needs to be done away with (I am a parent). Those that breed should not be dependent on a tax credit for doing so. Why can't we have policies that reward good behavior opposed to subsidizing irresponsible behavior?
This isn't the worst of the pro child-bearing policies of the U.S., welfare parents should not receive 1 cent more if they choose to reproduce while on government assistance. If they agree to take birth control and refrain from child bearing while on assistance, hell, let's throw another $100 or so at them a month.
And that line of thinking is exactly how you get a Moslem majority in the United States much like in Europe. We need to increase incentives for American families to procreate in order to protect our society!
Posted on 12/14/17 at 1:26 pm to Tiguar
quote:
Do you know what he's wanting adjusted?
its about that 20 vs 21% corporate tax rate thing, he had something good in the tax bill they took out because it would raise the rate from 20% to 20.5% so they took it out claiming no matter what they had to keep the rate at 20% to have the intended affect of business growth.
now they upped the corporate tax rate to 21% anyway, so he is rightly mad they arent putting his amendment back in when the only reason they took it out was to keep the rate at 20% so he does have a good point here.
the Rubio-Lee amendment would make the child tax credit refundable against payroll taxes
Page 2 of 5
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News