Started By
Message

re: FOUND: Hamas War Manual (glorifies use of human shields)

Posted on 8/7/14 at 1:14 pm to
Posted by jamboybarry
Member since Feb 2011
33188 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

WG_Tiger23


I will do as I please you Hamasshole sympathizer
Posted by AUin02
Member since Jan 2012
4529 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 1:16 pm to
quote:

colonialism is a good and humane thing.


Some things done in the name of colonialism were admittedly inhumane. But dude you live in the US right? Colonialism is the reason this country even exists in its current form...
Posted by WG_Tiger23
La
Member since May 2014
504 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 1:18 pm to
Not a sympathizer

Posted by jamboybarry
Member since Feb 2011
33188 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

I find it interesting that the assault rifle on the cover appears to be an M-16


Probably leftovers from the bunch Olmert gave Abbas
Posted by Porky
Member since Aug 2008
19138 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

Probably leftovers from the bunch Olmert gave Abbas

They must be awfully proud of them.
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 1:21 pm to
quote:

Colonialism is the reason this country even exists in its current form...

What's your point?
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 1:26 pm to
quote:

Did Israel have the legal right to control access to Gaza by air and sea under the Oslo Accords? Weren't the Israelis allowed to control the air and sea around Gaza until a permanent agreement was reached?

I agree with this, but don't you think that the time to strike a deal with Hamas was after they won the elction and had been observing a 16-month long cease fire, and before they got frustrated and reacted to the blockade? Obviously the status quo was unsustainable.
Posted by darkhorse
Member since Aug 2012
7701 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

had been observing a 16-month long cease fire,


Obviously facts are not what you want to hear. What you want to hear is people agreeing with you that Israel is bad and needs to go.

You were given the data of that 16 month ceasefire that they "upheld"... Now that you have been given the facts, you still use it.

The first time you stated it could have been in error, the second is just a flat out lie.

Now I will give you a break down again. Let's see if you want to continue to lie about a 16 month cease fire.

Posted by Poodlebrain
Way Right of Rex
Member since Jan 2004
19860 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 1:57 pm to
There was a lot of distrust to be overcome on both sides, and unfortunately that distrust has only grown since.

Should Israel have taken a more wait and see approach? It's hard to say no in hindsight. But the capture of Shalit six months after the elections would have precipitated some sort of Israeli response.

Should Hamas have made it clear that they had evolved past demanding the elimination of Israel? It would have prevented an awful lot of turmoil and misery.

The mistakes made are all part of the history that now influences the policies of both sides. The issue is what can be done to move things forward? Israel is not going to lift the blockades until some sort of permanent peace arrangement is made, but it must be willing to ease them, and I believe it is willing. Hamas must definitively recognize Israel's right to exist. Those are the necessary first steps. My belief is that the ball is in Hamas' court.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
57895 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 2:04 pm to
quote:




:NB4CreatedByTheIDF:
Posted by darkhorse
Member since Aug 2012
7701 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 2:12 pm to
quote:

he mistakes made are all part of the history that now influences the policies of both sides. The issue is what can be done to move things forward? Israel is not going to lift the blockades until some sort of permanent peace arrangement is made, but it must be willing to ease them, and I believe it is willing. Hamas must definitively recognize Israel's right to exist. Those are the necessary first steps. My belief is that the ball is in Hamas' court.


It amazes me that:

1- HE has to lie to to make a point. It invalidates the point.

2- He willfully over looks the 30 years of peace between Egypt and Israel. Are they best buds, no... but they reached an agreement and both have pretty much lived by them.

3- He is using the Hamas election as if it was a great thing. He clearly is staying away from the fact that EGYPT, after the election, set up blockades and only allowed a few things in.. and out. No out cry!

4- As of yesterday.. Hamas turned down Israel's extension of the true unconditionally. Why?





Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
57895 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 2:15 pm to
Because rabble-rabble-rabble, that's why.
Posted by FT
REDACTED
Member since Oct 2003
26925 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 2:17 pm to
quote:

Colonialism is the reason this country even exists in its current form...
No. Waging a war against colonialism is. If colonialism had succeeded, we'd be part of the commonwealth.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465981 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 2:21 pm to
we had the good blessing to be colonized by a western, developed nation of western ideals

we had the good blessing (and intelligence) to also remain being colonized long enough to where we could be autonomous
Posted by FT
REDACTED
Member since Oct 2003
26925 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 2:21 pm to
I agree, but colonialism is the exact opposite of the reason we're a nation.
Posted by Poodlebrain
Way Right of Rex
Member since Jan 2004
19860 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 2:27 pm to
Colonialism in North America was not quite the same as colonialism elsewhere. Colonialism elsewhere was predicated on controlling the indigenous population with minimal number colonists. Colonialism in North America was predicated on supplanting the indigenous population with colonists.
Posted by davesdawgs
Georgia - Class of '75
Member since Oct 2008
20307 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 2:31 pm to
Will likely be discredited by liberal progressives as fabricated propaganda.
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

Obviously facts are not what you want to hear. What you want to hear is people agreeing with you that Israel is bad and needs to go.

My problem is more with Likud, the current ruling party in Israel, and other rejectionists, rather that with the Israeli people as a whole.

quote:

You were given the data of that 16 month ceasefire that they "upheld"... Now that you have been given the facts, you still use it.

The first time you stated it could have been in error, the second is just a flat out lie.

Now I will give you a break down again. Let's see if you want to continue to lie about a 16 month cease fire.

I don't know where you got this chart from but there's nothing in it that contrdicts what I said. Hamas ended the cease fire on June 10, 2006. Do the math. Also, do you have a link for the chart?

quote:

Palestinian militants fired five rockets at southern Israel early Thursday, shortly after officials said Israeli threats had cowered the Hamas-led government into stopping the attacks.

The Israeli army said one person was slightly injured in the southern town of Sderot and a building was damaged. The Islamic Jihad military group took responsibility for the attacks.

Hamas had said it was ending a 16-month cease-fire against Israel in response to an explosion Friday that killed eight civilians on a Gaza beach. Several dozen rockets were then launched into Israel, prompting the Israeli government to issue threats against Hamas.

LINK
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

Palestinian militants fired five rockets at southern Israel early Thursday, shortly after officials said Israeli threats had cowered the Hamas-led government into stopping the attacks.

The Israeli army said one person was slightly injured in the southern town of Sderot and a building was damaged. The Islamic Jihad military group took responsibility for the attacks.

Hamas had said it was ending a 16-month cease-fire against Israel in response to an explosion Friday that killed eight civilians on a Gaza beach. Several dozen rockets were then launched into Israel, prompting the Israeli government to issue threats against Hamas.


So what you are saying is that Hamas was not firing those missiles, the Islamic Jihad Military group was firing from within Gaza and Hamas was unable to stop them ...............

That is laughable.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
125394 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

February 9, 2005 A barrage of 25 to 50 Qassam rockets and mortar shells hit Neve Dekalim settlement, and another barrage hit at noon. Hamas said it was in retaliation for an attack in which one Palestinian was killed near an Israeli settlement.


quote:

July 14, 2005 Dana Galkowicz, 22, was killed in a Qassam attack in Kibbutz Netiv Ha'asara, just north of the Gaza Strip. Hamas, Islamic Jihad Movement in Palestine and Fatah all claimed responsibility for the attack.


There were plenty of other rocket attacks from Gaza into Israel in 2005. I only included the ones where Hamas claimed responsibility explicitly.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram