- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Former FBI Director James Comey indicted
Posted on 9/27/25 at 2:03 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Posted on 9/27/25 at 2:03 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
IF "Person 3" is not McCabe, then I agree that they might have a good case.
Social media chatter says it is Daniel Richman
quote:
At what point does the prosecution have to inform the defense of the identities of Person 1 and Person 3?
Court will set a deadline requiring DOJ to turn over their shite.
3
Posted on 9/27/25 at 2:11 pm to JimEverett
I see the Richman posts, but I wouldn't say it's been established beyond a doubt.
Posted on 9/27/25 at 2:16 pm to JimEverett
The irony to this is that MSNBC and others leaked the coming indictment in panic, plus a try at tainting evidence.
The fresh news on this in MSM is the names of the redacted people. We know damned well the good guys at the DOJ would never do this. So they are again trying spoilage on the case again IN LEAKING AGAIN.
The Megyn Kelly podcast with a lawyer on the dem side are pondering if Comey's defense will be malicious prosecution.
If this is true-- then I naively & foolishly ask---Why didn't Flynn, Bannon, Navarro, Manafort, and all the others truly use malicious prosecution?
Is the logical and only answer because the DC judges were so tainted left and bias?
Therefore, a leftist judge would adhere to Comey, saying it is malicious to dare question his weird psychotic self?
Bueller, lawyers, class, class, anyone care to opine?
Will Comey's weirdo leaker friend go to jail for Comey? When we have James Baker and Andrew McCabe, the IG, possibly more... already throwing Comey under the bus in sworn testimony?
The fresh news on this in MSM is the names of the redacted people. We know damned well the good guys at the DOJ would never do this. So they are again trying spoilage on the case again IN LEAKING AGAIN.
The Megyn Kelly podcast with a lawyer on the dem side are pondering if Comey's defense will be malicious prosecution.
If this is true-- then I naively & foolishly ask---Why didn't Flynn, Bannon, Navarro, Manafort, and all the others truly use malicious prosecution?
Is the logical and only answer because the DC judges were so tainted left and bias?
Therefore, a leftist judge would adhere to Comey, saying it is malicious to dare question his weird psychotic self?
Bueller, lawyers, class, class, anyone care to opine?
Will Comey's weirdo leaker friend go to jail for Comey? When we have James Baker and Andrew McCabe, the IG, possibly more... already throwing Comey under the bus in sworn testimony?
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.This post was edited on 9/27/25 at 2:18 pm
Posted on 9/27/25 at 3:22 pm to cajunangelle
Amending my previous belief on person 3. I think it is James Baker, not the professor.
Should get more info this week, hopefully.
Funny, we can't clearly establish some of these names because Comey was such a tool.
Should get more info this week, hopefully.
Funny, we can't clearly establish some of these names because Comey was such a tool.
Posted on 9/28/25 at 7:40 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Posted on 9/28/25 at 10:11 am to Bronco11
The new media talking point is Biden never called on his DOJ to act. (Trying to get Trump for calling out Bondi from letting statute of limitations run out)
I blame Binder Bondi for this,.
Not that it matters...But Biden did express he was mad at the pace of Garland getting Trump; and removed Trump's clearance just to get him in the FBI raid.
I blame Binder Bondi for this,.
Not that it matters...But Biden did express he was mad at the pace of Garland getting Trump; and removed Trump's clearance just to get him in the FBI raid.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.quote:
A superseding indictment is a legal document that replaces a prior indictment to include new charges or amend errors. It is the result of a prosecutor presenting additional evidence to a grand jury, which may add parties and/or counts to the original indictment. Essentially, it allows for the inclusion of different or new charges and defendants, ensuring that the indictment reflects the most current information available.
Posted on 9/28/25 at 11:13 am to JimEverett
Jimmy Dore...
Posted on 9/28/25 at 1:51 pm to JimEverett
Posted on 9/28/25 at 3:32 pm to cajunangelle
The walls are closing in.
Posted on 9/28/25 at 3:33 pm to Strannix
When does Comey get silver bracelets?
Posted on 9/28/25 at 7:37 pm to cajunangelle
The sheer audacity of complaining about President Trump urging Pam Bondi to do her job could not be more appalling.
--
--
This post was edited on 9/28/25 at 7:39 pm
Posted on 9/28/25 at 8:16 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
LINK
This is a facebook reels video that is very interesting that explains a lot of what is going on...
This is a facebook reels video that is very interesting that explains a lot of what is going on...
Posted on 9/28/25 at 10:08 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
Defense will be malicious prosecution.
Malicious prosecution is not a defense to a criminal indictment and trial. It is a cause of action in a civil matter for damages. If Comey is found not guilty (or the charges are dropped), he can sue the government for malicious prosecution by showing that he was found innocent, the government proceeded based on malice, and that he suffered damages.
Posted on 9/29/25 at 7:05 am to Leopold
Now let's see if the malicious murder of Lavoy Finicum by the FBI gets brought up. Wiki it, and you'll see no reference to Comey, yet he was the FBI director at the time. There may be a better reason to nail him on that crime. Just a guess. Comey had his hands in a lot of atrocities. It's just a matter of time for him. Tree Sun. That was his own tweet message in a picture he posted. He knows he is under a microscope.
Posted on 9/29/25 at 9:47 am to cajunangelle
It's obvious they went after Comey first because he's the most likely to talk and actually be truthful in that. Weasels gonna weasel
Posted on 9/29/25 at 10:46 am to Bama Bird
Wray was referred to DOJ in the news Aug 2, 2025. He lied under oath about the CCP and the 2020 election, as well as trad Catholics FBI infiltrated, and J6.
Trump posted about Wray. He may be on deck. Can anyone find where Wray went after resigning after it being said he was fired?
Trump posted about Wray. He may be on deck. Can anyone find where Wray went after resigning after it being said he was fired?
Posted on 9/29/25 at 11:38 am to cajunangelle
Good question. I used a couple AI approaches and couldn't find anything.
At least with Wray there wouldn't be the same statue of limitations problems that there are with Comey.
At least with Wray there wouldn't be the same statue of limitations problems that there are with Comey.
Posted on 9/29/25 at 12:02 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Didn't Comey write a new book about "right wing terrorists"?
Posted on 9/29/25 at 12:09 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Posted on 9/29/25 at 12:19 pm to cajunangelle
Good find.
Page 16 of 17
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News