- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ford’s ex BF has submitted sworn testimony indicating ford lied under oath
Posted on 10/2/18 at 9:55 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Posted on 10/2/18 at 9:55 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
What I find odd about that transcript is that, typically, they tell you to answer Yes/No unless they ask you to expound ... which they usually do for you.
The number one polygraph guy in the country resides right here in SC. He works for GPN and trains people within their org. He says the current test is almost impossible to defeat, even by the best liars. The machines are fine tuned and so advanced they pick up every little tell.
But still, she was allowed a wide berth with her answers. Very unusual transcript.
The number one polygraph guy in the country resides right here in SC. He works for GPN and trains people within their org. He says the current test is almost impossible to defeat, even by the best liars. The machines are fine tuned and so advanced they pick up every little tell.
But still, she was allowed a wide berth with her answers. Very unusual transcript.
3
Posted on 10/2/18 at 9:55 pm to djmicrobe
quote:
She needs to come clean, name names. Who put her up to it, who paid her off. Give her immunity
Can already see the Dem reaction:
She’s insane! No credibility!!!
Posted on 10/2/18 at 9:59 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Posted on 10/2/18 at 10:01 pm to TakingStock
quote:
Is the consensus that Mitchell knew Ford had coached others on taking a polygraph?
Eh, it’s possible she knew, but this seems like it would be a pretty standard question to ask a psychologist that took a polygraph. Similar to “are you currently on any mediciation” and “have you seen any of the questions I have asked you today beforehand.”
Posted on 10/2/18 at 10:05 pm to Jon Ham
quote:
Your source is a twitterer who doesn’t cite her source. We need further confirmation. Everyone hold tight.
It’s in Grassley’s letter to Fords attorneys asking them to turn over evidence they either cited or provided to the WaPo.
Posted on 10/2/18 at 11:15 pm to ABearsFanNMS
Can we ask BF if Ford voice is like 15 year old?
Posted on 10/2/18 at 11:19 pm to CamdenTiger
The person he names has been confirmed as working for FBI and SDNY.
Posted on 10/2/18 at 11:27 pm to ApexTiger
quote:
Can we ask BF if Ford voice is like 15 year old?
This
Posted on 10/3/18 at 12:19 am to McChowder
quote:
This is how you do it folks. He gave info that could be corroborated. The name of the friend, the fact they lived together and the statement that the polygraph "coaching" was for a job application with the FBI. Boom! It's been confirmed. Her friend went on to become an FBI agent. It's all about to fall apart!! I love it.
I hope it is in fact proven, and to the point where charges are being considered for lying to the committee.
However - and I’m sure there will be disagreements here - I do not think she should be indicted for it.
The left would seize on it as victim blaming and I think that would risk overplaying the hand.
I think as long as it’s thoroughly exposed, the point will be made and she will be completely discredited.
This post was edited on 10/3/18 at 12:21 am
Posted on 10/3/18 at 12:42 am to BobBoucher
Point taken but after what they have done to the Judge, someone has to pay a price for it. I think you bring her lying arse in and tell her talk or be indicted. If nothing is done, they will play this tune again next time and not make the same mistakes. We cannot let them get away with it.
She's no victim here, Judge Kavanaugh and his family are and justice must be served. You sell that and go after the Democrats and those crooked lawyers hard. Somebody has to go down.
She's no victim here, Judge Kavanaugh and his family are and justice must be served. You sell that and go after the Democrats and those crooked lawyers hard. Somebody has to go down.
This post was edited on 10/3/18 at 12:46 am
Posted on 10/3/18 at 12:45 am to antibarner
quote:
Somebody has to go down.
I won’t disagree with that. I just think it needs to be a lawyer or Dem that set it up. Gotta tie it to politics.
Going after the “victim” to a point can be really bad optics.
This post was edited on 10/3/18 at 12:49 am
Posted on 10/3/18 at 1:27 am to BobBoucher
quote:
Going after the “victim” to a point can be really bad optics
In this hypothetical where it’s been proven she fabricated the entire thing she is no longer a victim at all and she needs to be held accountable so this bullshite doesn’t happen again.
Posted on 10/3/18 at 1:32 am to DallasTiger11
What do you want to bet she won't sound like a 12 year old this time? She's in on it and she is NO victim.
No mercy...this is to the death now and the Democrats have got to go down for it. And Dr. Mousy-Bitch is a co conspirator.
No mercy...this is to the death now and the Democrats have got to go down for it. And Dr. Mousy-Bitch is a co conspirator.
This post was edited on 10/3/18 at 1:35 am
Posted on 10/3/18 at 2:39 am to scrooster
quote:
He works for GPN and trains people within their org. He says the current test is almost impossible to defeat, even by the best liars. The machines are fine tuned and so advanced they pick up every little tell.
A guy working for a company who's business depends on the belief that the polygraph is infallible, what would you expect him to say?
Posted on 10/3/18 at 3:44 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Odds you won't hear about this on ABC,NBC,CBS,CNN and MSNBC within the next 24 hours?
Posted on 10/3/18 at 3:57 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
twitter??? 
Posted on 10/3/18 at 4:07 am to skinny domino
What part of “he sent a letter to the committee” are you too stupid to understand?
Are you asserting the letter doe not exist because it was spoken of on twitter?
Are you asserting the letter doe not exist because it was spoken of on twitter?
Posted on 10/3/18 at 4:22 am to gthog61
The same people who believe "Twitter" is an actual source think "Drudge Report" is an actual source.
Posted on 10/3/18 at 4:59 am to BobBoucher
quote:
I do not think she should be indicted for it. The left would seize on it as victim blaming and I think that would risk overplaying the hand.
She’s no sexual abuse victim, she’s a Soros operative
Posted on 10/3/18 at 5:00 am to Bamafan24
Silly question...
If the statement from the ex-boyfriend was in the hands of the SJC before the circus last week, why is it dated/timestamped 10/2/18 at 8:01 PDT? Wouldn't that be yesterday morning?
If the statement from the ex-boyfriend was in the hands of the SJC before the circus last week, why is it dated/timestamped 10/2/18 at 8:01 PDT? Wouldn't that be yesterday morning?
Page 8 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News