- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 1/9/26 at 7:28 pm to KCT
You don’t understand the lefts reaction to this without first understanding that they’re not mad that she died, they’re mad she didn’t kill him.
This post was edited on 1/9/26 at 7:30 pm
Posted on 1/9/26 at 7:28 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:SOS is a whiny little ....
Don't be a tattletale.
This board is monolithic enough without trying to get a dissenting voice thrown off. Hank's not doing anything but disagreeing.
Surely you're not afraid of that.
Well, I'll not finish that thought.
The funny thing is that he always seems to think that he is "winning."
Posted on 1/9/26 at 7:28 pm to KCT
Idk. This is tough.
I’ve never seen a cop shoot someone’s head off just from resisting. Slightly excessive.
If you resist you die?
I’ve never seen a cop shoot someone’s head off just from resisting. Slightly excessive.
If you resist you die?
This post was edited on 1/9/26 at 7:49 pm
Posted on 1/9/26 at 7:29 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
But it does seem to me that the one officer who was struck by the vehicle shouldn't be the lone consideration.
quote:
if police officers are justified in firing at a suspect in order to end a severe threat to public safety, the officers need not stop shooting until the threat has ended
He ended the severe threat to public safety
I posted a video earlier of a man in a g wagon that a cop only grazed in the head as he ran over the cop
The man came back to run over the cop again as he was trying to put on a tourniquet
Posted on 1/9/26 at 7:30 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
The funny thing is that he always seems to think that he is "winning."
I don't always win. No one does. But I've made you look stupid when you tried arguing that drag queens were not dangerous and you thinking pedophiles should be housed in minium security prisons. Just to name a couple.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 7:30 pm to The Pickwick
quote:
Probably shoot her tires out
Are you being serious? Please tell me you are not!
Posted on 1/9/26 at 7:30 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
Read Rickard. The two cases bear exactly zero resemblance to one another.
O.k., that's fine.
I didn't ask the question because of that case, it just showed up at the same time.
But you haven't answered the question.
An officer is obligated to be able to articulate exactly what other officers or bystanders might be in danger and where they were mere milliseconds after barely surviving being struck by a vehicle driven by the person whom he shot?
That's the legal standard?
That's a heck of a standard.
This post was edited on 1/9/26 at 7:32 pm
Posted on 1/9/26 at 7:31 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
didn't realize he broke board rules. What rule did he break?
Using a alter because his Hank handle is banned
Posted on 1/9/26 at 7:31 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:Again, read Rickard.quote:Until she tried to drive away quickly, recklessly disregarding the safety of the officers in the proximity of her car.
Ms. Goode was sitting still on a city street
It was the precursor actions of the driver (the long, dangerous, high-speed chase) that justified the use of deadly force ... not the mere attempt to leave the parking lot.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 7:32 pm to SOSFAN
quote:
Using a alter because his Hank handle is banned
I see.
Why was he banned?
Posted on 1/9/26 at 7:33 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
It was the precursor actions of the driver (the long, dangerous, high-speed chase) that justified the use of deadly force ... not the mere attempt to leave the parking lot.
Yes, in that circumstance.
But I thought you said that case was not controlling.
I'm asking just based on a reasonable standard, not any one case.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 7:33 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
see.
Why was he banned?
Ask him
Posted on 1/9/26 at 7:33 pm to The Pickwick
quote:
So if someone is in the wrong, murder is justified. Got it !!!!
Yes if they are operating a vehicle that can kill or injure somebody!
Posted on 1/9/26 at 7:37 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:As I recall, the standard is that the actions of the officer must be reasonable ... based upon what the officer knew at the time of discharging his weapon.
I'm asking just based on a reasonable standard, not any one case.
In Rickard, the officer(s) knew that Rickard was about to get BACK on a roadway and likely continue his prior reckless behavior ... placing more officers and civilians at risk.
In this case, Agent Fife knew only that Good might go somewhere else and blow a whistle at some other LEO.
See the difference?
If he KNEW that there were six dozen children playing stickball in the street on the next block, the calculus would certainly be different.
This post was edited on 1/9/26 at 7:42 pm
Posted on 1/9/26 at 7:42 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
A woman driving away from the office is no longer a threat, such that this "training" is no longer applicable
Are you SFP??? Lol
Seriously, wtf??? Your a complete idiot!
Tell me this, if some stupid arse Karen attempts to run you over, you pull your gun and shoot her... you have the control in a split second of defending your life that you don't continue firing.
Very few people have been in that position and are qualified to pass judgement.
Your just a clown on a message board talking about things you really have no idea about.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 7:43 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
Rickard had led officers on a dangerous, multi-mile, high-speed chase. He was cornered in a parking lot and was shot as he was attempting to escape the parking lot and re-initiate the high-speed chase.
Ms. Goode was sitting still on a city street and maybe blowing a whistle.
I assure you that the Rickard case is not controlling here.
She was not sitting still when she drove right into the officer
ETA & she was lawfully ordered multiple times to get out of the car
Doesn't matter if it was 5 millimeters 5 miles high speed low speed reverse doing jumping jacks donuts front flips or any other horse shite you come up with...the moment you try to run over police with your vehicle it becomes a deadly weapon to which they have a right to protect themselves in self defense and end the threat to public safety
This post was edited on 1/9/26 at 7:46 pm
Posted on 1/9/26 at 7:44 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
See the difference?
I see that there are differences, yes. I see that in the one case the officers had multiple actions over a prolonged period of time and in the other they had one action in a split second.
But again, is the case you are comparing this one to dispositive or defining of the standard or not?
If so, I think that's a mighty tough standard. It's basically like saying that—if the woman had unexpectedly produced a firearm and fired one shot out the window instead of unexpectedly striking the guy with her vehicle—that the law expects officers to determine in a split second whether or not she would do it again and concluding that since she had not engaged in such behavior before she fired the shot, there was insufficient basis to conclude that she might be a sufficient public threat to justify deadly force.
Like I posted above, that's a hell of a standard to hold LE to.
This post was edited on 1/9/26 at 7:46 pm
Posted on 1/9/26 at 7:45 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
quote:You are mistaken, but you won't accept that from me.
Doesn't matter if it was 5 millimeters 5 miles high speed low speed reverse doing jumping jacks donuts front flips or any other horse shite you come up with...the moment you try to run over police with your vehicle it becomes a deadly weapon to which they have a right to protect themselves in self defense and end the threat to public safety
In a few years, maybe we can revisit the issue ... after a series of courts have agreed with me, and you are whining about the injustice of it all.
Page 7 of 16
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News