Started By
Message

re: For Anybody Here Who Thinks the ICE Agent Acted Wrongly, Tell Me What He Should've Done

Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:35 pm to
Posted by Arktigers
Member since Sep 2022
965 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:35 pm to
Anyone who has seen the videos, road was slick and officers slipping approaching the vehicle. One officer by drivers door trying to halt driver after she failed to comply to command. Another officer at front of vehicle. It’s not that easy to move quickly on ice/snow. She should have complied with officers commands.

Secondly, it’s apparently not a big deal if you park your vehicle perpendicular to traffic in the middle of a street. According to CNN, it’s perfectly fine as long as traffic can go around on either side of
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
49935 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:42 pm to
quote:

Idk. Maybe/ maybe not.


Seriously? There were several protesters there. Did anybody else get shot?
Posted by TigerVespamon
Member since Dec 2010
7514 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:42 pm to
Posted by Clark14
Earth
Member since Dec 2014
27162 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:42 pm to
quote:

I don't think this woman intended to hit the officer either. But it's asinine to me that anyone thinks he didn't have reasonable cause to believe she might be doing so.


Do you think blowing her head off was the best way to stop the vehicle when he was clearly out of harms way? His actions only accelerated the vehicle and left it unattended.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
44255 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:44 pm to
She looked at him.

She hit the gas.

He defended himself against an insane communazi.

Why are you defending a violent leftist?

Posted by Clark14
Earth
Member since Dec 2014
27162 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:44 pm to
She was turning the steering wheel to the right away from the shooter, he was in no danger. The video clearly shows it.
This post was edited on 1/9/26 at 9:45 pm
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
35926 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:45 pm to
quote:

I don't think this woman intended to hit the officer either. But it's asinine to me that anyone thinks he didn't have reasonable cause to believe she might be doing so.


Of course she did. Are was looking straight at him while she was still moving backwards. She jamed it into drive and gunned it while never taking her eyes off him.
Now she may not have thought she would hurt or kill him but she definitely tried to hit him.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
44255 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:45 pm to
You are dumb.
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
36755 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:46 pm to
quote:

She was turning the steering wheel to the right away from the shooter, he was in no danger. The video clearly shows it.

Was anyone else in danger? Serious question.
Posted by BigEasy92
Member since Oct 2025
482 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:47 pm to
I believe ICE is lawless at the moment. They will get away with anything right now. Whether it is legal or not.

To say this guy has immunity forever is wild. Cops aren’t even held to this type of treatment.
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
35926 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:48 pm to
quote:

Do you think blowing her head off was the best way to stop the vehicle when he was clearly out of harms way? His actions only accelerated the vehicle and left it unattended.


You do realize cars have reverse correct. A person who is crazy enough to run you over would presumably be crazy enough to put it in reverse and finish the job.

Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
44255 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:48 pm to
The video clearly shows that:

quote:

She looked at him.

She hit the gas.


Your ilk is vile, and violent.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
44255 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:49 pm to
quote:

I believe ICE is lawless at the moment.


Yup, you are dumb.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13464 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:54 pm to
quote:

Do you think blowing her head off was the best way to stop the vehicle when he was clearly out of harms way? His actions only accelerated the vehicle and left it unattended.


As I have already posted to Aggie Hank, the reasonable legal standard in a potential life or death situation in which actions take place in milliseconds is not "What is the BEST answer?" It's whether a simple standard of "Is your life reasonably in danger?" has been met. It's a a simple binary, not an essay question.

You know why? Because when you have milliseconds to make a decision, you don't have time for an essay.

So in the context of deciding whether this officer did anything wrong, your question is irrelevant.

It might be relevant in reviewing it for training purposes. But not in the context of deciding whether the officer violated his office.

I posted this upthread, but it's really easy for you to sit in your robe and slippers in your recliner at home watching the video, rewinding and watching, rewinding and watching, pausing at a particular spot to see exactly what was happening there, resuming, etc., and think, "Well it's obvious that she wasn't trying to cause harm or put anyone in danger," but again, that's not the standard. The officer on the scene didn't have the multiple views you had. He wasn't watching in a robe and slippers from his recliner. He didn't get to pause the video and rewind it and watch again. He didn't have unlimited time to think about it and come to the conclusion that it might be better to just get a tag number because it was obvious from the view 20 feet behind the car that the driver was not going to put herself on a trajectory that might endanger anyone else.

I actually am amazed that y'all have so little ability to understand that.

No offense, but it seems kind of low IQ.
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
39349 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:55 pm to
quote:

The first shot through the windshield was technically justified.

The additional shots, after out of harm's way, are going to be problematic for him.
Have you seen the response? The Deep State is cheering him on.
Posted by BigEasy92
Member since Oct 2025
482 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:56 pm to
You = ad hominem fallacy

Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13464 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:56 pm to
quote:

I believe ICE is lawless at the moment.


Shhh.

The adults are talking.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
44255 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:57 pm to
quote:

No offense, but it seems kind of low IQ.


He is a goose-stepper. A bonafide communazi that hates America.

His post history (years in the making) backs up my assertion.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
44255 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:58 pm to
You are dumb.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13464 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:58 pm to
quote:

Of course she did. Are was looking straight at him while she was still moving backwards. She jamed it into drive and gunned it while never taking her eyes off him.
Now she may not have thought she would hurt or kill him but she definitely tried to hit him.


I'm not gong to argue with you because it doesn't mater whether she did or didn't.
Jump to page
Page First 9 10 11 12 13 ... 16
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 11 of 16Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram