- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Fencing being put up around the Supreme Court as we speak
Posted on 6/17/24 at 8:33 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 6/17/24 at 8:33 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Correct. I think there will be immunity and it's limited like it's limited elsewhere (to official acts within the authority/duties only). So the trial court will have to have a hearing/trial on this specific issue.
You’re right, don’t understand the 18 downvotes here.
It also means more appeals after the Judge makes a decision so the trial gets pushed back further.
2
Posted on 6/17/24 at 8:35 pm to DeltaHog
quote:Muh illegitimate court because they don't go against the Constitution and rubber stamp all the commie garbage that we want. Cry more
They do this bc they know they’re illegitimate
Posted on 6/17/24 at 8:40 pm to DeltaHog
quote:
They do this bc they know they’re illegitimate
What’s “illegitimate” about them?
Posted on 6/17/24 at 8:42 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
You’re right, don’t understand the 18 downvotes here.
People just don’t like SFP.
This post was edited on 6/17/24 at 8:44 pm
Posted on 6/17/24 at 8:44 pm to RFK
You forget about all the Hamas lovers lately?
Posted on 6/17/24 at 8:45 pm to 1BamaRTR
That’s pathetic. You downvote the post not the person.
Sensitive bunch on this board.
Sensitive bunch on this board.
Posted on 6/17/24 at 9:12 pm to GumboPot
quote:
That was a NYC civil case. I don't see how this applies to SCOTUS and Trump
I'm sure that a constitutional argument could be made that New York changed their statute of limitations law only briefly to target Trump specifically.
Posted on 6/17/24 at 9:50 pm to Tantal
you never know what is real or fake. too bad we can't trust the media.
but these fences look more like it.
but these fences look more like it.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 6/17/24 at 9:52 pm to GumboPot
quote:
think he is saying it will be sent back to Chutkan t
I don’t think they would erect fences for that. I think they are expecting a leftist revolt over the weekend for whatever they are releasing.
Which means it will probably be a Friday release so DC can clear before the paid agitators get organized.
Edit: sounds fake.
This post was edited on 6/17/24 at 10:18 pm
Posted on 6/17/24 at 10:05 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SlowFlowPro
Posted on 6/17/24 at 10:09 pm to BobBoucher
some X comments saying the fencing is from 2022. who would fake such a thing?
Posted on 6/17/24 at 10:14 pm to BobBoucher
on rantingly they have on the right side a post with this threads topic. it is by AF someone and it was removed. someone trying to look official but they are some larper chan tard.
this appears to be fake with old footage.
this appears to be fake with old footage.
Posted on 6/17/24 at 10:24 pm to Attilakiraly45
quote:
that was the way this board used to be
Number of Posts: 167
Registered on: 6/11/2024
Posted on 6/17/24 at 10:26 pm to RFK
quote:
The last people to storm government buildings weren’t democrats.
J6 was in 2020, right?
The DIMS stopped rowing and had to start wading in 2022, amirite?
Posted on 6/17/24 at 10:46 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
J6 was in 2020, right?
No, it was in 2021.
Posted on 6/17/24 at 10:51 pm to OMLandshark
I’d personally prefer they shoot anyone trying to burn those buildings down instead of using fencing.
Thats exactly why people storm buildings….unless you’re unarmed and your name is Ashli Babbitt
Thats exactly why people storm buildings….unless you’re unarmed and your name is Ashli Babbitt
This post was edited on 6/17/24 at 10:52 pm
Posted on 6/17/24 at 10:51 pm to MoarKilometers
quote:
No, it was in 2021.
So still a full year before the overturning of Roe, when the DIMs stormed govt bldgs?
Posted on 6/17/24 at 11:45 pm to OMLandshark
Another setup in the works like Jan 6
Posted on 6/17/24 at 11:53 pm to GumboPot
quote:
possibly throwing out the E Jean Carroll bullshite case
That was a NYC civil case. I don't see how this applies to SCOTUS and Trump.
The State Courts filter up to the USSC when it goes from a State Supreme Court.
Posted on 6/18/24 at 12:10 am to Crimson1st
the SCOTUSblog calendar says Thursday & Friday are both opinion release days
all the opinions from last year's cases have to be released by the end of the month... it's getting late enough to where they have to start releasing the more "controversial" opinions
and yes... this year's controversial opinions include the Trump cases and the case that could see the end of Chevron deference
all the opinions from last year's cases have to be released by the end of the month... it's getting late enough to where they have to start releasing the more "controversial" opinions
and yes... this year's controversial opinions include the Trump cases and the case that could see the end of Chevron deference
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News