5
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Feds Investigating Epstein Estate Executors
Posted on 9/23/26 at 1:41 pm
Posted on 9/23/26 at 1:41 pm
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. This one goes out to all of those who insisted Bondi was lying when she said there were still Epstein investigations ongoing.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 1:46 pm to BoarEd
Is this the official narrative we aren't to believe?
I agree with your take btw. It's just funny that you start a thread upset about official doj narratives but you believed Pam Bondi. And then when asked to square that logic, you act like a woman about it.
I agree with your take btw. It's just funny that you start a thread upset about official doj narratives but you believed Pam Bondi. And then when asked to square that logic, you act like a woman about it.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 1:47 pm to BoarEd
Would like a list of names who got settlement payments as well!
Posted on 9/23/26 at 1:48 pm to BoarEd
quote:
New York-based federal prosecutors have begun investigating Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, who served as Epstein's lawyer and accountant, respectively. Both currently serve as executors of the Epstein estate.
The scope of the investigation remains unclear and the WSJ indicated that it could not determine what charges may be on the table for either man.
Very little substance and nothing from which any conclusions can be formulated.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 1:51 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Very little substance and nothing from which any conclusions can be formulated.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 1:53 pm to SallysHuman
There are thousands of crimes that would have nothing to do with what were considered "Epstein" CTs prior to 2025.
Like, if they stole from the estate or engaged in tax fraud, those would have nothing to do with the CTs.
Strong kernel of truth fallacy going on
Like, if they stole from the estate or engaged in tax fraud, those would have nothing to do with the CTs.
Strong kernel of truth fallacy going on
Posted on 9/23/26 at 1:55 pm to dgnx6
quote:
It's just funny that you start a thread upset about official doj narratives
Who says I'm upset about the DoJ narratives?
quote:
And then when asked to square that logic, you act like a woman about it.
Who asked me to square that logic? I've only made one post here until this one so I'm not sure why you are saying I'm acting like a woman in response to people asking me to square my logic either. I am merely bringing this along for those who didn't believe Bondi when she said there were ongoing investigations. I presented no further commentary.
quote:
I agree with your take btw
You should have just left it at this, because the rest of your post is frickin stupid.
quote:
dgnx6
AH. That explains it.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 1:57 pm to SallysHuman
Well, is it all a hoax or is Trump going to take down the Epstein pedo cabal?
Posted on 9/23/26 at 2:00 pm to BoarEd
It's now a known fact that Pam Bindi was put in there to fire all of the legacy/TDS employees in the DOJ and hire new employees that believe in the constitution. She fired thousands of people and hired thousands more
She basically was put in there to clean house to hand it over to Todd Blanche tk be the bulldog
She basically was put in there to clean house to hand it over to Todd Blanche tk be the bulldog
This post was edited on 9/23/26 at 2:01 pm
Posted on 9/23/26 at 2:00 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Strong kernel of truth fallacy going on
You like to throw this bullshite phrase around a lot. Who is engaging in a kernel of truth fallacy here?
Posted on 9/23/26 at 2:08 pm to DeBoar
Posted on 9/23/26 at 2:10 pm to Bunk Moreland
Posted on 9/23/26 at 2:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Very little substance and nothing from which any conclusions can be formulated.
I didn’t think you had that sentence in your repertoire.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 2:27 pm to FLTech
BTW These 2 guys got 25 million plus who knows... for just being executors.
If JEs NY Estate lost value its because they didnt sell in the sellers market.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 2:33 pm to charlesmartinmike
Will he return to the thread and explain who it is he thinks is engaging in kernel of truth fallacy or is he lying?
Posted on 9/23/26 at 2:35 pm to BoarEd
Where did Pam Bondi discuss investigations into executors of Epstein's estate, for you to make your comments in OP?
What evidence do you have to claim that this has anything to do with Epstein himself?
What evidence do you have to claim that this has anything to do with Epstein himself?
Posted on 9/23/26 at 2:37 pm to SlowFlowPro
Any update on why Blanche moved Maxwell to club fed after his closed door meeting w her???
I’m sure it’s nothing.
I’m sure it’s nothing.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 2:56 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Where did Pam Bondi discuss investigations into executors of Epstein's estate, for you to make your comments in OP?
As I said, she said there are investigations, plural.
quote:
What evidence do you have to claim that this has anything to do with Epstein himself?
Because they are seeking emails and financial records from Epstein's lawyer and accountant. It takes a special kind of retard (like yourself) to think this has nothing to do with Epstein when it is made public that they are investigating the executors of his estate.
Are you going to explain your comments about the kernel of truth fallacy you supposedly find in my thread or are you going remain a liar for about the 10,000th time?
Posted on 9/23/26 at 2:59 pm to BoarEd
quote:
As I said, she said there are investigations, plural.
Into Epstein, yes. This isn't an investigation into Epstein.
quote:
Because they are seeking emails and financial records from Epstein's lawyer and accountant.
Couldn't this be regarding their role as executor?
quote:
It takes a special kind of retard (like yourself) to think this has nothing to do with Epstein when it is made public that they are investigating the executors of his estate.
You're literally doing the kernel of truth fallacy here, in response to you asking me how this is the kernel of truth fallacy.
quote:
Are you going to explain your comments about the kernel of truth fallacy you supposedly find in my thread
We just did that and you proved me correct.
You're using the kernel of truth ("investigation into non-Epstein actors that have a tangential relationship into Epstein) to extrapolate into areas upon which you have no evidence (that this involves Bondi-referenced investigations of Epstein personally).
You just did the thing.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 3:06 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You're using the kernel of truth ("investigation into non-Epstein actors that have a tangential relationship into Epstein) to extrapolate into areas upon which you have no evidence (that this involves Bondi-referenced investigations of Epstein personally).
You just did the thing.
No I didn't. What I said is that she said there were still "Epstein investigations" ongoing. And there are. This investigation is clearly one of them. Epstein investigations obviously shouldn't be taken as "investigating Epstein personally" in this context as that mother fricker is dead.
This is accurately framed as an Epstein investigation as it pertains to matters involving Epstein's estate. There is no kernel of truth fallacy here, you're just a frickin' liar.
Hilarious how the king of implications who never plainly says shite himself has to try and take the most literal possible interpretation of other people's words to try to win arguments on the internet. It would be hilarious if it weren't so blatantly frickin pathetic.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News