- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Federal Judges go to media to trash SCOTUS and fight in the court of public opinion.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 9:43 am to Decatur
Posted on 9/4/25 at 9:43 am to Decatur
quote:
Which canon does this violate?
More than one.
Canon 1- They just tried to undermine the SCOTUS.
Canon 2: A Judge Should Avoid Impropriety and the Appearance of Impropriety in all Activities.
should act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.
This is not what this interview did. They did not promote that. They did the opposite.
Canon 3A(6).
The admonition against public comment about the merits of a pending or impending matter continues until the appellate process is complete. If the public comment involves a case from the judge’s own court, the judge should take particular care so that the comment does not denigrate public confidence in the judiciary’s integrity and impartiality, which would violate Canon 2A.
LINK
1
Posted on 9/4/25 at 9:44 am to BCreed1
Been saying it ,1or more of these judges is gonna be removed eventually
Posted on 9/4/25 at 9:44 am to BCreed1
quote:
makes it seem like they did shoddy work and are biased against Trump.
Because that is exactly what it is.
quote:
The Supreme Court, a second judge said, is effectively assisting the Trump administration in “undermining the lower courts,” leaving district and appeals court judges “thrown under the bus.”
You throw yourselves under the bus because of
quote:
shoddy work and are biased against Trump.
quote:
“It’s almost like the Supreme Court is saying it is a ‘judicial coup,’” the judge said.
That's because it is
Posted on 9/4/25 at 9:49 am to KingOrange
quote:Has he promoted himself to fake judge now?
SFP agrees with lower courts.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 9:53 am to Decatur
quote:
Which canon does this violate?
Probably #3 and #5
Canon 1: A Judge Should Uphold the Integrity and Independence of the Judiciary. This canon requires judges to maintain and enforce high standards of conduct, personally observing those standards to preserve the judiciary's integrity and independence.
Canon 2: A Judge Should Avoid Impropriety and the Appearance of Impropriety in All Activities. Judges must avoid both actual impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in their professional and personal lives to promote public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.
Canon 3: A Judge Should Perform the Duties of the Office Fairly, Impartially, and Diligently. Judges are obligated to carry out their judicial responsibilities without favoritism, ensuring fairness and impartiality while upholding the law with diligence and competence.
Canon 4: A Judge May Engage in Extrajudicial Activities That Are Consistent with the Obligations of Judicial Office. While judges can participate in educational, religious, charitable, fraternal, or civic activities, such participation must not detract from the dignity of the office, interfere with duties, or create conflicts of interest.
Canon 5: A Judge Should Refrain From Political Activity. Judges are prohibited from engaging in political activities that could compromise their impartiality, except for the right to vote and activities related to the appointment of other judges.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 9:55 am to BCreed1
quote:
Canon 1- They just tried to undermine the SCOTUS.
Okay
quote:
Canon 3A(6). The admonition against public comment about the merits of a pending or impending matter continues until the appellate process is complete.
I read the article and don’t see any instances of a judge commenting about the merits of pending litigation. I see a pretty tame criticism of how the court has been acting on its shadow docket.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 9:56 am to Meauxjeaux
quote:
So they went to NBC news to tell the world they’re not smart enough to figure out what the Supreme Court is telling them?
Not a good look for a federal judge.
Probably makes them as qualified as 2/9 of SCOTUS TBH.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 9:56 am to TigerB8
Yep!
Posted on 9/4/25 at 9:59 am to scrooster
quote:
It appears that Roberts is close to his wits end from what I've read. This latest stunt may prove to be the proverbial straw.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 9:59 am to BCreed1
quote:
They are not suppose to have your back. If they had your back, there would be no need for our system. They have the LAW's back.
Post of the day... NICE!
Posted on 9/4/25 at 10:00 am to BCreed1
[quote]All 12 judges spoke on condition that they not be identifiable, some because it is considered unwise to publicly criticize the justices who ultimately decide whether to uphold their rulings and others because of the risk of threats.
[/quote
And there is your answer as to who and what they are. COWARDS
[/quote
And there is your answer as to who and what they are. COWARDS
Posted on 9/4/25 at 10:01 am to Decatur
quote:
shadow docket.
Is this language from DU or your antifa email updates?
Posted on 9/4/25 at 10:06 am to roadGator
It’s talked about in the article linked in the first post of this thread. Why don’t you read it?
Posted on 9/4/25 at 10:12 am to Decatur
I might.
ETA: nope. It’s NBC. No need to read propaganda
ETA: nope. It’s NBC. No need to read propaganda
This post was edited on 9/4/25 at 10:13 am
Posted on 9/4/25 at 10:14 am to roadGator
Posted on 9/4/25 at 10:17 am to Decatur
quote:
Which canon does this violate?
Yikes. Do a modicum of research. Useful Idiot.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 10:27 am to Decatur
quote:
I read the article and don’t see any instances of a judge commenting about the merits of pending litigation. I see a pretty tame criticism of how the court has been acting on its shadow docket.
When a Federal Judge states this:
“It is inexcusable,” a judge said of the Supreme Court justices.
“It’s almost like the Supreme Court is saying it is a ‘judicial coup,’” the judge said.
That is in reference to SCOTUS decissions... thus merit. It also goes a step more and you cut that out:
If the public comment involves a case from the judge’s own court, the judge should take particular care so that the comment does not denigrate public confidence in the judiciary’s integrity and impartiality, which would violate Canon 2A.
Can't leave that out. They undermined PUBLIC CONFIDENCE in the SCOTUS. Period. They sat down to throw stones at the highest court.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 10:28 am to scrooster
No ….it’s up to congress and I predict at some point some of thes judges are gonna be removed
Posted on 9/4/25 at 10:29 am to BCreed1
The reason rulings are hard to explain is called job security for the legal profession.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 10:43 am to ole man
quote:
No ….it’s up to congress and I predict at some point some of thes judges are gonna be removed
It would take 16 libtard members of the house flipping in order to impeach a judge and that's not likely to happen.
However, Roberts is a firm believer in the absolute authority of the SCOTUS in these judicial matters and he knows he's already pissed-off Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and, to a lesser extent ACB recently ... by failing to slap down some of these activist judges with opinions when overturning their cases.
Gorsuch did it on his own in a scathing smack down on one of the cases recently overturned.
Roberts does demand some sense of authority over his court and he's lost face by allowing these cases to simply be overturned without forceful rebuttals.
Word is that he's about to go scorched earth ... particularly on certain cases where the lower courts are attempting to ignore or overrule previously determined judgements already handed down by SCOTUS under Roberts.
Where Roberts screwed the pooch was allowing things to go this far by allowing libtard politicians along with the two bitches KJB and Sotomayor to question his courts decisions ... without reprimanding them. Then, when Ron Johnson and Ted Cruz and Trump started openly blasting the court .... Roberts feigned indignation.
Now he's backed into a corner with only one way out.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News