Started By
Message

re: Federal Judge UPHOLDS FELONY CONVICTION of Milwaukee County Judge Hannah Dugan!

Posted on 6/17/26 at 9:51 am to
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
14645 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 9:51 am to
quote:

Smug fat leftist women are a cancer.


That's evident from the one in this thread.
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
14645 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 9:52 am to
quote:

Coming from a very sanctimonious poster



Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
14645 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 9:53 am to
quote:

quote:
being from the New Orleans area i know your type very well.


My type?


Yes, your type.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
61765 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 9:54 am to
Why not opine about the actual topic?
Posted by tigersmanager
Member since Jun 2010
11535 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 10:07 am to
committed a crime judges aren't above the law
Posted by TigerAxeOK
In the woods and by the waters.
Member since Dec 2016
38458 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 10:38 am to
quote:

Former Judge Hannah Dugan, caught red handed helping an illegal alien evade ICE agents right inside her own courthouse, has had her felony conviction UPHELD. Give her all 5 years

8 U.S.C. § 1324 is pretty clear. Shockingly, the Federal Judge saw it too.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
39994 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 10:40 am to
quote:

I read this article yesterday about a recreation of the Milgram experiment (when participants were instructed to deliver electroshocks to actors at increasing voltages) that made me sad about the lack of conviction people demonstrated. Its kind of uplifting to see someone actually stick to their guns.
You know, I often wonder if the middle-aged males on this board don't lean in too hard when going after you. But this drivel you've typed almost convinced me you are doing nothing but trolling, as it is a caricature of a caricature of how stupid you could be.

And BTW - the Milgram experiment is basically a scientific myth. The vast majority of people did NOT choose to "harm" the other humans in the experiment. And most of the ones that did the max shock were the ones most convinced it wasn't real.
Posted by TD422
Destrehan, LA
Member since Jun 2019
924 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 10:47 am to
quote:

You’re insinuating that judges possess special knowledge about the [quote]obligation to obey federal agents.



Cubbies, I'm honestly trying to extend an olive branch here...this is EXACTLY why you catch so much flak on here.

"Special knowledge"? SERIOUSLY? YEAH LADY IT'S CALLED THE LAW! I mean, she's only a judge...why we should know about that?

And yeah, she needs to follow the law, whether she likes it or not. Seeing as how she took an oath and all to UPHOLD THE F*CKING LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES!

You berate people for thinking differently from you, but you know I can't say the same about you because you need to START ACTUALLY THINKING.

Have a blessed day.
Posted by PeleofAnalytics
Member since Jun 2021
5459 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 10:54 am to
quote:

Is she in prison yet?

Unfortunately, I read she is not likely to receive prison/jail time since fed sentencing guidelines for this crime recommend probation when it is a nonviolent first time offender. She will likely have her license suspended and the disbarment is still a strong possibility. Fingers crossed. Regardless, she fricked her career and life three ways to Sunday
Posted by VOR
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2009
69050 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 11:12 am to

I'll certainly sleep better knowing a county judge in Wisconsin has been convicted for such a heinous crime.
Posted by UtahCajun
Member since Jul 2021
6274 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 11:49 am to
quote:

And BTW - the Milgram experiment is basically a scientific myth. The vast majority of people did NOT choose to "harm" the other humans in the experiment. And most of the ones that did the max shock were the ones most convinced it wasn't real

You do realize the experiments were replicated by Jerry M Burger in 2006 and the results were similar.
Burger's replication results results

I would say that 79% fully complying to the max capacity of the generator is not the results you are saying were found.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
61765 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

Cubbies, I'm honestly trying to extend an olive branch here...this is EXACTLY why you catch so much flak on here.

"Special knowledge"? SERIOUSLY? YEAH LADY IT'S CALLED THE LAW! I mean, she's only a judge...why we should know about that?

And yeah, she needs to follow the law, whether she likes it or not. Seeing as how she took an oath and all to UPHOLD THE F*CKING LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES!


I don't disagree with the conviction. JimEverett said that she should receive a harsher sentence because she was a judge at the time of the crime. That's the part I'm disputing.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
61765 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

UtahCajun



Do you think that my post connecting this to Milgram's experiment was totally off-base and out of left field? After reading Big Scrub's post, I'm trying to figure out if I'm really some sort of maverick thinker or if people are just trying to be mean to me.
Posted by redandright
Member since Jun 2011
9796 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

Hope she does 5 years hard time. She's a dyke but since she's a judge, she may get beat tf up in there.


She’ll be welcomed as a liberator.
She’s one of them.
Posted by redandright
Member since Jun 2011
9796 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

JimEverett said that she should receive a harsher sentence because she was a judge at the time of the crime. That's the part I'm disputing.


She violated the trust of the public by taking the law into her own hands.
She’s supposed to be like Caesar’s wife.
Or Pompeia’s anyway.
Posted by UtahCajun
Member since Jul 2021
6274 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

Do you think that my post connecting this to Milgram's experiment was totally off-base and out of left field? After reading Big Scrub's post, I'm trying to figure out if I'm really some sort of maverick thinker or if people are just trying to be mean to me

I do not know the exact context of why you posted it. Were you happy that a judge ruled that another judge is going to have to serve time or were you happy that the judge broke law? Really it does not matter in respect to the question you asked.

In both instances above I can see that someone may have broke ranks with percieved authority
Usually judges do not go harshly on other judges for fear of appearance to other judges
Usually judges abid by law for fear of other judges and lawmakers

So no, it really doesn't matter why you made the statement, I can see the statement was at least around the base.

Civility dictates that clarification of your statement would have been needed prior to any meaness towards you.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
39994 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

You do realize the experiments were replicated by Jerry M Burger in 2006 and the results were similar.
Burger's replication results results

I would say that 79% fully complying to the max capacity of the generator is not the results you are saying were found.
And looking under the hood, you get similar caveats as you do to Milgram which essentially completely re-cast the results.

To give one example, Milgram's shock machine went to 450 volts - but he designated 150 volts as the "point of no return", by which he meant 80% of participants that breached 150 would go on to administer the full 450.

Burger gamed this by ending his experiment at 150. He then conflated that with "willingness to administer lethal shock", which it, of course, was not.

There are many other similar parameters.

The bottom line is that there is no real evidence - and certainly not provided by Milgram - that the average Joe would be willing to kill his fellow man simply because he was directed to.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
39994 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 12:47 pm to
quote:


You’re insinuating that judges possess special knowledge about the obligation to obey federal agents.
As you should be well aware of, ignorance is not a legal defense. Certainly you can connect the dots that - in a less crazy age - one might reasonably assume that an actual officer of the law would be better acquainted with the law than most.

Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
39994 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

Using a low level leftist judge to prove a point
Why should extremely straighforward prosecutions of obvious crimes be called "proving a point"?
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
39994 posts
Posted on 6/17/26 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

The issue is whether she violated the law,
She did.

quote:

not whether judges owe greater deference to ICE than ordinary citizens.
What word salad is this? She owes exactly as much "deference" the the laws of the land as every other citizen, including you.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram